Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: explosives act 1884 section 4 definitions Sorted by: old Year: 2006 Page 81 of about 5,300 results (1.210 seconds)

inder Chand Through His Legal Representatives Vs. Smt. Jethi and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR2006Raj251; RLW2006(3)Raj2248; 2006(4)WLC144

..... plaintiff in his plaint for this purpose. the plaintiff nowhere stated that how she exercised her right of maintenance. she also did not plead her right under section 14of the hindu succession act, 1956. still, the right of the plaintiff if can be established by lawful inference on the basis of undisputed documentary evidence, the plaintiff cannot be denied ..... the property was given to the plaintiff in lieu of maintenance, therefore, she could not have become the owner of the property even with the help of section 14 of the act of 1956 as the said provisions cannot be invoked where the plaintiff is not fulfilling the requirements 'for becoming the owner of the property on the ground ..... of maintenance nor it was the case pleaded at all, therefore, the plaintiff has not become the owner of the property even by the help of section 14 of the act of 1956. it is also submitted that in fact the suit was filed collusively which is apparent from the statement of the plaintiff where she clearly stated .....

Saj Flight Services (P) Ltd. Vs. Supdt. of Central Excise

Court : Kerala

Reported in : (2006)201CTR(Ker)490; 2006(2)KLT73; 2006[4]STR432

..... : [2004]267itr9(sc) and was negatived. only contention raised by the petitioner was that it would not fall within the expression 'caterers' under sub-section 24 of section 65 of the finance act, 1994.4. we are not prepared to accept the contention of the counsel that service tax can be demanded only from those persons who are caterers ..... to the passengers on board. in our view that transaction would attract service tax. in our view service anywhere would attract the liability to tax under section 66 of the act. considering the nature of the work undertaken by the petitioner we find no infirmity in the order of the superintendent of central excise holding that petitioner is ..... the writ petitioners are providers of catering service to m/s. air india and are liable to get registered under section 69 of finance act (no. 2), 2004 and also to follow the provisions of the said act and rules with effect from 10-9-2004.2. writ petitioner submitted that it would not fall within the definition of .....

Manager, the Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Mantola and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : 2006(3)MPLJ329

..... short 'the tribunal') in claim case no. 26/99.2. the facts in a nut shell are that the respondent nos. 1 and 2 initiated an action under section 166 of the act on the foundation that on 13-2-1999 their son, jagdish, aged about 15 years was travelling in a bus bearing registration no. mp.15-d/5695 from ..... on the roof top contributes to the accident is correct and we are in respectful agreement with the same keeping in view the statutory provision engrafted under section 123 of the motor vehicles act. once we have accepted that such a passenger would be liable for contributory negligence we are disposed to state that such contributory negligence should be determined at ..... oriental insurance co. ltd. v. jashmani kongari and anr. , a similar question arose and the learned single judge of high court of jharkhand placing reliance on section 123(2) of motor vehicles act came to hold as under:1...on perusal of exh. 3, it was found that a premium of rs. 2,310 was paid for 21 passengers against third .....

Allergan Inc Vs. Sun Pharmaceuticals Industries Ltd.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : (2006)2CALLT272(HC),2006(2)CHN179,2006(32)PTC495(Cal)

..... which were issued by the authorities of australia and south africa should be taken into evidence as all the formalities have been observed, as provided under section 78(6) of the act.15. it appears from those two certificates that the plaintiffs product 'ocuflox' came into the market on 17th november, 1992 as per certificate issued ..... document. so far as the present suit is concerned, it appears that the plaintiff has in effect literally complied with all those requirements as provided under section 78(6) of the act. as such, there cannot be any bar in admitting those certificates in evidence. ld. advocate for the defendant vehemently opposed this submission of the ld ..... the world. our legislature was also not unmindful to this problem. as such, provision has been made to that effect in the indian evidence act. it appears from section 78 of the indian evidence act that it has been laid down to the effect:-the following public documents may be proved as follows:* * * *(6) public documents of .....

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Kerala State Industrial Development Cor ...

Court : Kerala

Reported in : (2007)209CTR(Ker)371; [2007]289ITR238(Ker); 2006(2)KLT98

..... the mere fact that the debtor companies were not wound up at the relevant point of time does not mean that the assessee cannot claim deduction under section 36(l )(vii) of the act. we are of the view that the tribunal is right in law in holding that the assessee is entitled to deduction of the two amounts in ..... materials to hold that the debts due to the assessee company are irrecoverable. the tribunal held that the assessee is entitled to get benefit of deduction under section 36(1)(vii) of the act. aggrieved by the said order this appeal has been preferred by the commissioner of income-tax.4. senior counsel appearing for the revenue sri. p.k. ..... for the lender to wait till the debtor company actually goes into liquidation before writing off the loan and interest thereon and claiming the deduction under section 36(1)(vii) of the i.t. act. winding up proceedings is a cumbersome process where claims of large number of secured and unsecured creditors have to be settled, which may take .....

Prashant Sapre Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : RLW2006(3)Raj2124; 2006(2)WLC668

Ashok Parihar, J.1. Since on similar set of facts, same relief has been claimed, all the above writ petitions have been heard together and are being decided by this common order.2. Admittedly, the petitioners had been appointed on the post of Coach in different games and sports on contract basis for a fixed term. Apart from claiming regularization, the petitioners have also prayed for regular pay scale for the post of Coach alleging that they have been given appointment after due selection. In view of interim order passed by this Court the petitioners are continuing on the posts in question even after expiry of period of contract.3. The respondents, in their reply, have disputed the facts as submitted by the petitioners. It has been contended that there have never been regular selections from open market and petitioners also joined the services fully knowing the terms and conditions of contract. As such, the prayers made by the petitioners cannot be accepted by this Court under writ ju...

B. Maribettappa Vs. the Zilla Panchayat and anr.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2006KAR1748; 2006(2)KarLJ654

ORDERD.V. Shylendra Kumar, J.1. Petitioner was a daily wage worker in the services of the 1st respondent-Zilla Panchayat from 21-6-1979. Petitioner's services were regularized as a daily wage worker with effect from 1-1-1990 and the petitioner started working as a permanent employee from this date onwards by creating supernumerary post in terms of a Government Order No. DPAR 2 SLC 90, dated 6-8-1990.2. While the petitioner was working in such a position as a junior work inspector his services were placed at the disposal of the Zilla Panchayat, Chickmagalur, against an existing vacancy of Second Division Clerk a post which was available at Zilla Panchayat, Chickmagalur, and making the petitioner's appointment permanent with effect from 1-1-1998. These are all undisputed facts.3. Petitioner retired on attaining superannuation with effect from 31-3-2005.4. While the petitioner claimed for pensionary benefits on the premise that his services were regularised with effect from 1-1-1990 upto ...

Flour and Food Ltd. Vs. Jt. Cit

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : (2006)203CTR(MP)369

..... advance of rs. 15 lakh ?2. whether in the facts and circumstances of the case, the income tax appellate tribunal has erred in holding that under section 80hhc of the income tax act no deduction was allowable on the amount of rs. 10,80,571 on the ground that there was no direct nexus between these receipts and the export ..... the commissioner (appeals) on this count and restore the matter to the file of the assessing officer to recompute the deduction under section 80hhc in view of clause (baa) of explanation below sub-section (4b) of section 80hhc of the act.'9. in our view, the tribunal having noted that for want of any material, not on record and having been filed ..... same cannot form part of the profit of a business eligible for the purpose of deduction under section 80hhc of the act. we are, therefore, of the view that the aforesaid receipts are hit by explanation (bad) below sub-section (4b) of section 80hhc of the act and do not form part of the profit of business. as such, we do not find .....

Northern India Steel Rolling Vs. Commissioner of Cus.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

..... -2005 wherein the commissioner of customs has confiscated the imported goods with an option to redeem the same on payment of redemption fine and also imposed penalty under section 112 of the customs act, 1962.2. the relevant facts that arise for consideration are the appellants herein imported heavy melting scarp from mozambique vide bill of lading no. mzmdelncn 0341, dated 22 ..... that the goods shipped vide our invoice no. 2004042, dated 22-10-04 does not contain any type of arms, ammunition, mines, shells, catridges, radio active contaminated or any other explosive material in any form either used or otherwise.6. the said goods i.e. heavy metal scrap was loaded into 10 containers and the said containers were loaded into the .....

Vijay Raj Sethia Vs. Asstt. Cit

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Hyderabad

..... perceptible difference between hexane products and petroleum ether, the same was being sold to petroleum bunks for adulteration ie. mixing it with petrol. taking advantage of the explosive licence and certification from industries department as regards storage capacity which the assessee had, the assessee used to purchase the solvent oil from oil companies, lift the ..... was seized. the transactions recorded in the bank account did not form part of' regular books of account maintained by the assessee. in a statement under section 132(4), the assessee agreed that the said bank account was operated exclusively for the purposes of the above mentioned activity and that he used to obtain ..... of 55 tankers of petroleum ether had been undertaken by shri koteswara rao. he pointed out that the assessing officer in that case, where shri koteswara rao acted as a businessman, had accepted the gross profit rate of 8.2596. he also pointed out that the commission received at rs. 1,80,000 was disclosed .....