Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: explosives act 1884 section 4 definitions Sorted by: old Year: 2006 Page 78 of about 5,300 results (0.765 seconds)

Standard Chartered Bank and ors. Vs. Directorate of Enforcement and or ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2006SC1301; 2006(1)ALD(Cri)614; II(2006)BC391(SC); 2006(3)BomCR621; (2006)2CALLT42(SC); [2006]130CompCas341(SC); 127(2006)DLT747(SC); 2006(197)ELT18(SC); JT2006(3)SC421; (2006)4SCC278

..... for decision. on the whole, we are satisfied that there is no justification in accepting the argument that unless an adjudication proceeding under section 51 of the act is completed, a prosecution under section 56 of fera cannot be initiated. both proceedings can simultaneously be launched and can simultaneously be pursued.22. counsel submitted that the ..... precede the making of a complaint in writing to the concerned court for prosecuting the offender. the absence of a similar proviso to section 56 or to section 51 of the present act, is also a clear indication that the legislature intended to treat the two proceedings as independent of each other. obviously, the legislature ..... those aspects in these appeals. suffice it to say, that the arguments on this score are of no avail while considering the constitutional challenge to section 68 of the act as being violative of articles 14 and 21 of the constitution. we reject the contention, leaving it to the concerned appellant to raise that plea .....

Punjab State Civil Supplies Corp. Ltd Vs. Sikander Singh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2006SC1438; 102(2006)CLT3(SC); JT2006(3)SC457; (2006)IILLJ14SC; (2006)143PLR206; 2006(2)SCALE670; (2006)3SCC736

..... ) by l.rs. : [1973]3scr364 , the question which arose for consideration was as to whether a director having regard to the provisions of section 235 of the companies act, committed acts of misfeasance. the said decision ex facie has no application in the present case. therein, this court was concerned with a case where the director was ..... and mala fide orders and proceedings and also by fabricating official records. such a suit for damages is certainly not within the province of section 14.20. thus, tortious acts, being not the ones which could be subject matter of departmental proceedings or negligence under a contract of employment, cannot give rise to a ..... trust vis-&agrve;-vis the shareholders of the company. in that case all the directors were found to have committed acts of fraud. the court took recourse to the provisions of section 45h of the companies act wherein special provisions for assessing damages against delinquent directors have been laid down. 24. reliance has also been placed .....

The Haryana State Agricultural Marketing Board Vs. Subhash Chand and a ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2006SC1263; JT2006(3)SC393; (2006)IILLJ241SC; 2006(2)SCALE614; (2006)2SCC794; 2006(3)SLJ87(SC)

..... person means his personal legal condition only so far as his personal rights and burdens are concerned. dugganna v. ganeshayya : air1965kant97 , 101. [indian evidence act (1 of 1872), section 41]in the language of jurisprudence status is a condition of membership of a group of which powers and duties are exclusively determined by law and not ..... held that having regard to the nature of termination of services it would not come within the purview of the said definition, the question of applicability of section 25g of the act does not arise.12. in state of u.p. v. neeraj awasthi and ors. : (2006)illj721sc wherein this court upon taking into consideration the ..... with entire wages and thus this court should not exercise its discretionary jurisdiction under article 136 of the constitution of india. 'retrenchment' has been defined in section 2(oo) of the act to mean:.2(oo) 'retrenchment' means the termination by the employer of the service of a workman for any reason whatsoever, otherwise than as a .....

Ratanlal Soni Vs. Nityanand Sanghi (Died Per Lrs.) and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2006(3)ALD342

..... we have held (scc p.57, para 6) the rule of estoppel between landlord and tenant enacted in section 116 of the evidence act has three main features : (i) the tenant is estopped from disputing the title of his landlord over the tenancy premises at the beginning of the tenancy; (ii) such ..... been inducted by the landlord so long as he remains in possession cannot deny the title of his landlord in view of the rule of estoppel contained in section 116 of the evidence act. recently in vashu deo v. balakishan, we had occasion to sum up the law as to estoppel of a tenant and as to eviction by title paramount and ..... has materially reduced the utility and value of the suit premises. the respondent in order to harass and cause loss to them, filed a vexatious petition under section 8(5) of the rent control act in r.c. no. 1098 of 1987 on the file of the principal rent controller, hyderabad, for deposit of rent and the same is pending. the respondent .....

Musaraf HossaIn Khan Vs. Bhagheeratha Engg. Ltd. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2006SC1288; 2006(1)ALD(Cri)653; 2006(2)AWC1749(SC); II(2006)BC515(SC); 2006(3)BomCR98; [2006]130CompCas390(SC); (2006)4CompLJ419(SC); 2006CriLJ1683; 2006(2)CTC57; JT2006

..... failed to make the payment within 15 days of the receipt of the notice.37. for the purpose of proving the aforementioned ingredients of the offence under section 138 of the act, the complainant-appellant was required to prove the facts constituting the cause of action therefore none of which arose within the jurisdiction of the kerala high court ..... petition. in the writ petition it merely wanted some time to make the payment. it is now well known that the object of the provision of section 138 of the act is that for proper and smooth functioning of business transaction in particular, use of cheques as negotiable instruments would primarily depend upon the integrity and honesty of ..... :.hd. considered. cog. is taken. examined the complainant mosaraf hossain on s/a. a prima facie case has been made out against the accused persons under section 138 n.i. act. issue summons upon the acids persons at once. to 3/2/05 for s/r & appear....6. the respondents allegedly received the summons sent to them .....

Varghese Vs. Padappu Ksheerolpadaka Sahakarana Sangham Ltd.

Court : Kerala

Reported in : [2006(109)FLR687]; 2006(2)KLT116; (2006)IILLJ1052Ker

..... in an employment specified in part i or part ii of the schedule and i n an employment added to either party by notification under section 27:the act also defines 'scheduled employment' under section 2(iv)(g) which reads thus:2. interpretationxxx xxx xxxxxx xxx xxx(g) 'scheduled employment' means an employment specified in the schedule or ..... workers of the 1st respondent society.6. we have considered the rival contentions of the parties in detail. fixation of minimum wages is as per section 3 of the minimum wages act, 1948 the relevant portion of which reads as under:3. fixing of minimum rates of wages(1) the appropriate government shall, in the manner ..... without purpose. therefore, collection and sale of milk would form part and parcel of the process of dairy farming itself.8. further it should be noted that the act itself gives a specific: definition for 'scheduled employment' mean an employment specified in the schedule, or any process or branch of work forming part of such employment ( .....

Maharashtra State Seeds Corpn. Ltd Vs. Haridas and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2006SC1480; 2006(4)BomCR834; [2006(109)FLR291]; JT2006(3)SC23; (2006)IILLJ107SC; 2006(2)SCALE584; (2006)3SCC690; 2006(2)SLJ433(SC)

..... law can be rectified by an officer. if the mistake of law has to be established by construing the words of a section to find its proper meaning, then such an error cannot normally be a rectifiable error under section 36. if two views are possible, then obviously the error will not be an error apparent from the record.18 as the ..... enquiry officer had no jurisdiction to recommend any punishment to be imposed on the respondent by the disciplinary authority, he although acted thereupon at the first instance, could have corrected ..... s.b. sinha, j. 1 the appellant herein is a company incorporated and registered under the companies act, 1956. it deals in production and supply of seeds to the farmers. the respondent herein was appointed as an assistant field officer. while he was working at nanded, misconducts committed .....

P. Mani Vs. State of Tamil Nadu

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2006SC1319; 2006CriLJ1629; 2006(3)CTC193; I(2006)DMC471SC; JT2006(2)SC607; 2006(I)OLR(SC)610; 2006(2)SCALE482; (2006)3SCC161

..... and then she bolted the room from inside. as they saw smoke coming out from the room, they rushed towards the same and broke open the door. section 106 of the evidence act to which reference was made by the high court in the aforementioned situation, cannot be said to have any application whatsoever.11. the high court furthermore commented upon ..... the said statements of the investigating officer and other witnesses inter alia on the ground that the burden of proof thereof lies upon the appellant in terms of section 106 of the evidence act as also, in view of the fact that the appellant did not suffer any bum injury.10. we do not agree with the high court. in ..... occurrence from 4.10.98 to 21.10.1998. the learned court opined that it was for the appellant herein to offer some explanation in terms of section 106 of the evidence act as the occurrence took place inside a room and the appellant was present therein. only because the deceased had undergone histectomy operation, the court was of the .....

Bihar School Examination Board, Patna Vs. Mamta

Court : Bihar State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Patna

..... is a consumer under the c.p. act and the district forum has clear jurisdiction to entertain and dispose of the complaint. the impugned order and the facts of the case clearly indicate that there was ..... answer papers, unreasonable delay in publishing results, etc. are administrative aspects relating to education and thus not excluded from the definition of service under the c.p. act, especially when fees are charged for holding the examination as consideration. therefore, in the light of these rulings in the present case under consideration also, the complainant ..... 1952 and that the board does not render any service for hire as defined under the c.p. act and education does not come under the c.p. act. further the complainant is not a consumer under the c.p. act and the complaint was not maintainable under the consumer forum. 5. we have perused the records. .....

Sri Krishna Tiles and Potteries (Madras) Pvt. Ltd., Rep., by Its Direc ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : [2007]135CompCas292(Mad); 2006(2)CTC642

..... as against a partner or a director of the company with regard to its own property. the complainant will have to remedy his grievances invoking sections 627 to 630 of the companies act. the allegations made by the complainant will not attract the penal provisions of the indian penal code. therefore the accused seek for quashment of ..... 008, on the complaint presented by the second respondent herein under section 200 of the code of criminal procedure.3. the averment in the complaint preferred by the second respondent is as follows:-the first accused is m/s. sri ..... 2005 on the file of the inspector of police, team-iv, central crime branch, egmore, chennai-600 008.2. the petitioners have been booked for the offences under sections 379, 468, 471, 420 and 506(ii) of the indian penal code, based on the reference made by the learned additional chief metropolitan magistrate, egmore, chennai-600 .....