Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION No.5212/2013 Shambhu Lal & Anr. V/s. Ishwar Lal Date of Order :::28. 05.2013 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.K. LOHRA Mr. Suresh Shrimali for the petitioners. Mr. Ashwani Babel for the respondent. The petitioners-defendants have laid the present petition for assailing the impugned order dated 17th April, 2013 (Annex.14) passed by the learned Civil Judge (Jr. Div.) (West) Bhilwara, whereby the learned Judge has dismissed the application of the petitioners under section 151 CPC. By the said application under Section 151 CPC, the petitioners have made endeavour to persuade the learned court below to permit the petitioners to mark exhibit on the certified copy of the decision in criminal case which was taken on record by the learned trial Court by its order dated 20th April, 2012. The petitioners have, inter alia, averred in the application that due to bona fide error and oversight, certified 2 copy of the judgment o...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
[1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR ORDER S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.4184/2011 State of Rajasthan & Ors. Versus Smt. Padam Kanwar & Ors. Date of Order :22. 07.2013 PRESENT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOVIND MATHUR Mr. Yashpal Khileree for the petitioners Mr. Dhanpat Choudhary for the respondent No.1 BY THE COURT : To question correctness of the award dated 11.02.2011 passed by the Permanent Lok Adalat, Jodhpur in Public Utility Case No.5/2007, this petition for writ is preferred. In brief, facts of the case are that the respondent- applicant undergone a surgery for sterilization on 12.05.2006 at Community Health Center, Balesar. In spite of sterilization, the applicant conceived and delivered a girl child on 14.02.2007. Being suffered with mental shock and economic loss caused as a consequence of giving birth to a girl child despite sterilization, she claimed a compensation in a tune of Rs.2,50,000/- from the present petitioners. On being failed [2] to get any relief ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
1 SB Company Petitions Nos.1/2012, 2/2012, 3/2012 and 4/2012 30 t1. S.B. Company Petition No.1/2012 Redial Trading & Investment Pvt. Ltd. Vs. None 2. S.B. Company Petition No.2/2012 Prasham Corporate Securities Vs. None 3. S.B. Company Petition No.3/2012 Green Field Securities Pvt. Ltd. Vs. None 4. S.B. Company Petition No.4/2012 Dolphin Corrior Pvt. Ltd. Vs. None DATE OF ORDER:23. d July 2013 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI Mr. Dinesh Mehta, for the petitioner/s. Mr. K.C. Meena Official Liquidator is present in person with the counsel Ms. Madhulika Vyas Ms. Garima Chauhan for Mr. V.K. Mathur, for the UOI. BY THE COURT: These petitions, being co-related, have been considered together and are taken up for disposal by this common order. Company Petition No.1/2012 This is a petition filed by Redial Trading & Investment Pvt. Ltd., a company incorporated under the provisions of the Companies Act, 1954 [the Act of 1956] having its registered office at 12, Badal Textile Market, Pur Roa...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR ORDER S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.2843/1995 Udai Singh vs. Board of Revenue & Ors. Date of Order :23. d July, 2013 PRESENT HON'BLE MR JUSTICE VIJAY BISHNOI Mr Sudheer Sharma, for the petitioner Mr Sundeep Bhandawat, for the respondents BY THE COURT: REPORTABLE This writ petition has been preferred by the petitioner against the order dated 30.06.1992 passed by the Assessing Authority District Collector, Barmer in the ceiling proceedings culminated under the provisions of Rajasthan Imposition of Ceiling on Agricultural Holdings Act, 1973 (for short 'the Act of 1973' hereinafter) and the order dated 24.10.1994 passed by the Revenue Board in an appeal preferred against the order passed by the District Collector, Barmer. Brief facts of the case are that proceedings under the provisions of Chapter III-B of the Rajasthan Tenancy Act, 1955 (for short 'the Act o1955. hereinafter) were initiated against the petitioner and the Assistant Co...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR :ORDER: S.B. CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.514/2005 Mohan Lal & Ors. Vs. Mohan lal Date of Judgment 25th July, 2013 PRESENT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN BHANSALI Mr. Rajeev Purohit, for the petitioners. Mr. S.L. Soni, for the respondent. ---- BY THE COURT: REPORTABLE This revision petition under Section 115 CPC has been filed by the defendants aggrieved against order dated 22.09.2005 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Jodhpur, whereby, the petitioners' application under Order VII, Rule 11 (d) CPC was rejected. Brief facts of the case are that respondent-plaintiff filed a suit for redemption of mortgage relating to property situated at Khanda Falsa, Ada Bazar, Jodhpur. It was, inter alia, averred in the plaint that the property in question was mortgaged on 24.01.1950 for a sum of Rs.6,000/- by father of the plaintiff with Ojha Kanni Ram Ji, Champa Lal Ji, Mohan Lal Ji and Sri Kishan Ji with the stipulations contained ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
[1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR ORDER S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.6666/2013 Kalu Ram Vs. Panchayat Samiti, Degana & Ors. DATE OF ORDER : July 30, 2013 ::P R E S E N T:: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.K. LOHRA Mr. M.C. Bhoot, Senior Advocate, assisted by Mr. Arpit Bhoot, for the petitioner. Mr. K.K. Bissa, Addl. Government Counsel, for the respondents. Mr. P.P. Choudhary, Senior Advocate, assisted by Mr. Amit Dave, for the intervener. **** BY THE COURT: Petitioner, Kalu Ram, has laid this writ petition for imploring annulment of Resolution No.2 dated 21st of May 2013 (Ex.8) passed by the second respondent. Besides the aforementioned relief, the petitioner has also prayed for seeking a direction against the respondents to extend the term of contract for the year 2013-2014. Succinctly stated, the factual matrix of the case is that an agriculture land measuring 261.72 bighas and 4 biswas situated at village Harsol in the Khatedari of [2] Panchayat Samiti, Degana was auc...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR :ORDER: Kesari Chand Sethia Vs. State of Rajasthan & Others (S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.8359/2010) DATE OF ORDER : August 2nd, 2013 PRESENT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS ____________________________________ Mr. C.S. Kotwani for the petitioner. Mr. K.K. Bissa, Govt. Counsel. Mr. I.S. Pareek, Addl. Govt. Counsel. BY THE COURT : Instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioner who was working on the post of Junior Accountant in the office of the Project Director, Agriculture & Land Survey Department, Bikaner to challenge the order of prosecution sanction passed against him dated 01.07.2006 (Annex.-6), so also, the suspension order dated 02.07.2010 (Annex.-8). Brief facts of the case are that on 07.06.2005, an 2 FIR was lodged against three persons namely, Vijay Singh Nahta, Pratap Singh Rao and Nakhta Ram at CPS ACB Jaipur bearing No.120/2005 under Section 13(1)(d)(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and S...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
[1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR **** :JUDGMENT: Vikas Verma Vs. Rajasthan University of Veterinary and Animal Sci- ences, Bikaner & Ors. D.B. CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (WRIT) NO.401/2012 Appeal under Rule 134 of the Rajasthan High Court Rules against the order dated 18.04.2012 passed in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.749/2012 DATE OF JUDGMENT:13. h August, 2013 PRESENT HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. AMITAVA ROY HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.K. LOHRA Mr. Rajvendra Saraswat for Dr. Sachin Acharya, for the appellant. Mr. D.S. Rajvi, for respondent No.1 & 2 Mr. Ravi Bhansali, for Veterinary Council of India. Reportable BY THE COURT (PER HON'BLE LOHRA, J):1. Appalled by the judgment and order dated 18th of April 2012, passed by the writ Court, the appellant has laid this intra-Court appeal. [2] 2. The appellant has approached the writ Court seeking di- rection against the respondents to consider his case for mi- gration/transfer from Arawali Veterinary College, Sikar to College ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
[1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR **** :JUDGMENT: Yashpal Singh Chaudhary Vs. State of Rajasthan & Anr. D.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.12093/2010 Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of In- dia DATE OF JUDGMENT:19. h August, 2013 PRESENT HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. AMITAVA ROY HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.K. LOHRA Mr. Dipesh Beniwal, legal representative of the petitioner, in person. Mr. V.K. Mathur, Assistant Solicitor General of India for re- spondent No.2, Rajasthan High Court. Mr. Anand Purohit, Additional Advocate General, assisted by Mr. Pradhuman Singh, for the respondent State. Reportable BY THE COURT (PER HON'BLE LOHRA, J):1. This legal battle was launched at the behest of a compulsorily retired judicial officer for assailing the impugned order dated 31st of March 2010 (An- [2] nex.9), and after his unfortunate demise in Ut- trakhand Gory Tragedy, is pursued by his legal representatives.2. Scorning the checkered history of the case, the brief ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
[1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR ORDER 1 S.B. CIVIL SALES TAX REVISION NO.196/2003 Indian Gum Industries Ltd. Vs. Assistant Commissioner 2.S.B. CIVIL SALES TAX REVISION NO.183/2003 Indian Gum Industries Ltd. Vs. Assistant Commissioner 3.S.B. CIVIL SALES TAX REVISION NO.194/2003 Indian Gum Industries Ltd. Vs. Assistant Commissioner 4.S.B. CIVIL SALES TAX REVISION NO.195/2003 Indian Gum Industries Ltd. Vs. Assistant Commissioner 5.S.B. CIVIL SALES TAX REVISION NO.230/2003 Indian Gum Industries Ltd. Vs. Assistant Commissioner 6.S.B. CIVIL SALES TAX REVISION NO.231/2003 Indian Gum Industries Ltd. Vs. Assistant Commissioner DATE OF ORDER:29. hAugust, 2013 ::P R E S E N T:: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.K. LOHRA Mr. M.S. Singhvi, Senior Advocate, assisted by Mr. Vinay Kothari, for the petitioner. Mr. V.K. Mathur, Assistant Solicitor General of India with Mr. Dinesh Kumar for the respondents. *** Reportable BY THE COURT: All these six revision petitions are preferred by th...
Tag this Judgment!