Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on : Jul-15-2015
By Cr Misc Petition No.3560/2014, challenge is made to the order dated 29.5.2014, passed by the learned Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Jaipur Metropolitan, dismissing the application moved by the petitioners for declaring the proceedings taken against them as null and void ab initio so as the order dated 28.6.2014 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge No.13, Jaipur Metropolitan on criminal revision petition against the order dated 29.5.2014. A further prayer is to declare remand of accused petitioners as null and void so as the custody and they may be discharged and set at liberty. The petitioners have also challenged the order dated 21.6.2014 passed by the District and Sessions Judge, Jaipur (in Cr Misc Petition No.3420/2014), order dated 18.8.2014 passed by the District and Sessions Judge, Jaipur (in Cr Misc Petition No.3798/2014). The challenge to the aforesaid orders have been made on the same grounds as have been urged in the main Cr Misc Petition No.3560/2014 and separa...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on : Jan-07-2015
The instant writ petition is directed against the judgment cum award dated 21.9.1994 passed by the Labour Court, Bikaner in Case No. 40/1990 whereby the reference made by the State Government under Section 10(1)(G) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 was disposed of directing that the dismissal of the respondent workman Mahendra Yadav from service of petitioner school shall be effective from 21.9.1994. Succinctly stated the facts are that the respondent no. 2 workman was engaged as watchman in the petitioner school in the year 1977. It appears that there were complaints regarding the performance of the duties and conduct of the employee on which he was dismissed from service w.e.f. 20.3.1986 after holding a domestic enquiry wherein it was found that the workman was guilty of misconduct. The respondent workman raised an industrial dispute. The State Government referred the dispute to the Labour Court, Bikaner under Section 10(1)(G) of the I.D.Act. The Labour Court by its order dated 28...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on : Jan-15-2015
Sunil Ambwani, ACJ. 1. We have heard Ms. Indira Jai Singh, Senior Advocate, assisted by Mr. Aditya Shrivastava, Ms. Bindu N. Doddahat and Mr. Satish Kumar for the petitioners in DBCWP No.375/2015-Dulari Devi and Ors. v. State of Rajasthan and Ors. and DBCWP No.376/2015- Norati and Anr. v. State of Rajasthan and Ors.; Mr. Rajendra Soni in DBCWP No.1/2015, Mr. Pradeep Kalwania in DBCWP No.209/2015; Shri S.S. Hora in DBCWP Nos.503/2015 and 504/2015; Mr. Vijay Choudhary in DBCWP No.251/2015, Mr. Hanuman Choudhary in DBCWP No.250/2015, Mr. Manoj Bhardwaj in DBCWP Nos.121/2015 and 122/2015, and Mr. Bharat Yadav for the petitioners. Mr. Narpal Mal Lodha, learned Advocate General, assisted by Mr. Vishal Soni, Mr. Sheetanshu Sharma, Mr. Rajendra Prasad, Additional Advocate General, Mr. Anurag Sharma, Additional Advocate General and Mr. R.B. Mathur, appear for the State of Rajasthan and other respondents. 2. By these writ petitions, the petitioners have prayed for an appropriate writ, order or d...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on : Jan-28-2015
SBC First Appeal No.469/2009 Ram Singh & Ors. vs. Bhikam Chand & Ors. Judgment dt:28. 1/2015 1/35 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR JUDGMENT Ram Singh & Ors. vs. Bhikam Chand & Ors. S.B.CIVIL FIRST APPEAL No.469/2009 DATE OF JUDGMENT :28. h January, 2015 PRESENT HON'BLE Dr. JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI Mr.Jitendra Chopra, for the appellant-defendants Mr. Suresh Shrimali, ]. Mr.Sundeep Bhandawat,]. for the respondent-plaintiffs. Mr.Ashok Patel, ]. BY THE COURT: REPORTABLE1 The defendants Ram Singh s/o Ghasi Ram & ors have filed the present first appeal under Section 96 CPC against Bhikam Chand s/o Ram Jeevan & anr. being aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 12/8/2009 passed learned Addl. District Judge (Fast Track) No.3, Jodhpur in a suit for specific performance being Civil Suit No.603/2004 (351/2004) Bhikam Chand & Arun Kumar vs. Ram Singh s/o Ghasi Ram & Ors.2. The said suit for specific performance was filed by the plaintiffs Bhikam Chand & Ors. on 2/11/200...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on : Feb-10-2015
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJSTHAN AT JODHPUR ORDER D.B.Habeas Corpus Petition No.5/2015 Poonam Chand Bhadu versus State of Rajasthan & ORS.Date of order: 10.2.2015 PRESENT HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL Mr.CS Kotwani, for the petitioner. Mr.Rajesh Panwar, Addl. Advocate General. The instant Habeas Corpus Petition has been filed by the petitioner Poonam Chand Bhandu, uncle of detenu Tola Ram S/o Kishana Ram, resident of Tilak Nagar, Bikaner against the order dated 2.6.2014 (Annex.1) passed by the District Collector, Bikaner whereby the District Collector, Bikaner while exercising power under Section 3(1) of the Rajasthan Prevention of Anti-Social Activities Act, 2006 (hereinafter referred to as the Act of 2006 for short) passed an order of detention of detenu Tola Ram. In the writ petition, although so many grounds are raised by the petitioner, but the main ground is that the satisfaction recorded by the District Collector, ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on : Feb-12-2015
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.4066/2000 Kailash Chandra Jat Vs. Union of India & Ors. 1/14 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR :: ORDER :: PETITIONER: RESPONDENTS: Kailash Chandra Jat vs. Union of India & Ors. S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.4066/2000 Date of Order :12. h February 2015 : : PRESENT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL Mr. K.K. Shah, for the petitioner Mr. D.P. Dhaka, for the respondents BY THE COURT: The petitioner through the instant writ petition has sought quashing of orders dated 07.05.1993 (Annexure-4), 27.03.1997 (Annexure-7), 09.11.1999 (Annexure-9) and 06.08.2010 (Annexure-12), whereby his representations against his supercession were rejected. He has further sought that he be promoted with effect from 13.02.1993 and his seniority be restored above respondent No.4.2. The petitioner joined the Border Security Force as Assistant Commandant on 05.10.1987. An Assistant Commandant has to complete six years of service to be eligible for promotion ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on : Mar-10-2015
Dr. Vineet Kothari, J. 1. The appellant/defendant/tenant, having concurrently lost before the two courts below, has filed the present second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, assailing the judgment and eviction decree dated 10.07.2013 passed by learned Additional District Judge No. 1, Jodhpur Metropolitan, Jodhpur, whereby the first appeal filed by the appellant/defendant being Civil Appeal No. 12/2008, Smt. Geeta Devi v. Dr. Surendra Mai Mertiya, was dismissed, affirming the judgment and eviction decree dated 21.05.2008 passed by learned Addl. Civil Judge (Jr. Division) No. 3, Jodhpur, in Civil Original Suit No. 129/2007, Dr. Surendramal Mertiya v. Smt. Geeta Devi, whereby the suit filed by the plaintiff/respondent for eviction under Section 22 of the Rajasthan Premises (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1950 (for short, hereinafter referred to as 'Act of 1950. was decreed in favour of plaintiff/respondent granting eviction decree with respect to suit sho...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on : Mar-13-2015
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR :ORDER: S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.2014/2015 M/S.Dinesh Medical Store versus Shri Veermaram Charitable Trust, Balotra & ORS.Date of Order :: 13.03.2015 PRESENT HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE ARUN BHANSALI Mr.Manoj Bhandari, for the petitioner. Mr.M.M.Dhera, for the respondents. ---- BY THE COURT: This writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the petitioner aggrieved against the order dated 17.01.2015 passed by the appellate court, whereby the application filed by the petitioner under Section 45 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (the Act) has been rejected. The petitioner filed a suit before the trial court seeking permanent injunction to the effect that the defendants be restrained not to allot any other medical store or permit any other incumbent to sell medicines within the vicinity of the Trust premises, wherein hospital was being run by the Trust. A written statement was filed by the respondents and...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on : Mar-18-2015
-1- DB Civil Writ (PIL) Petition No.26/2013 (Sajjan Singh Bhati v. State of Rajasthan & Ors.) Date of Order :: 18th March, 2015 HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE GOVIND MATHUR HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL Mr.S.P.Sharma, for the petitioner. Mr.S.S.Ladrecha, for the State. Mr.Pramod Swaroop ].Dr. Sandeep Singh ].Ms.Pareena Swaroop ].Mr.Vikas Balia ].Mr.M.S.Singhvi ].Mr.Vineet Dave ].Mr.Anjay Kothari ].Mr.Mahesh Bora ].Mr.Nishant Bora ].Mr.Pankaj Sharma ].Mr.Ravi Bhansali ].Dr. Nupur Bhati ].for the respondents...The petitioner, a practicing Advocate, has preferred this petition for writ to have direction for the respondents to issue necessary guidelines to ban financial and banking activities carried out by various Credit Cooperative Societies including the respondents Nos.9 to 13. On 19.11.2014, noticing the facts averred in the petition for writ, this Court by relying upon the judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in Apex Co-operative Bank of Urban Bank of Maharashtra and Goa Ltd.v.Maharasht...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on : Mar-25-2015
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR :ORDER : S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.9669/2014 Gotan Lime Stone Khanij Udyog Pvt. Ltd. versus The State of Rajasthan & Ors. Date of Order ::25. 3.2015 PRESENT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN BHANSALI Mr. Dushyant Dave, Senior Advocate Mr. M.S. Singhvi, Senior Advocate assisted by Mr. Anjay Kothari, Mr. Varun Singhvi & Mr. Abhishek Mehta, for the petitioner/s. Dr. P.S. Bhati, AAG with ) Mr. S.S. Rathore ), for the respondent-State. Mr. P.K. Bhalla ) Mr. D.D. Thanvi ) Mr. Ramit Mehta ) for the respondent No.5. ----- REPORTABLE BY THE COURT: This writ petition has been filed by the Gotan Lime Stone Khanij Udyog Pvt. Ltd. ('petitioner' / 'Gotan Lime' / 'the Company') aggrieved against the order dated 16.12.2014 (Annex.22) passed by the Joint Secretary, Mines (Group-2), Government of Rajasthan, Jaipur, by which the order dated 25.4.2012 whereby the lease was permitted to be transferred in petitioner's favour has been declared void and the ...
Tag this Judgment!