Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: explosives act 1884 section 4 definitions Sorted by: old Court: rajasthan jodhpur Year: 2012 Page 1 of about 4 results (0.212 seconds)

May 30 2012 (HC)

Rajnarayan Rathi Vs. State

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

Decided on : May-30-2012

SB Criminal Misc. Petition No.754/2009 Raj Narayan Rathi. Vs. State of Rajasthan. (1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR. ::: JUDGMENT ::: S.B. Criminal Misc. Petition No.754/2009 Raj Narayan Rathi. vs. State of Rajasthan. Date of Judgment ::30. May, 2012. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MEHTA Mr.SN Vyas, for the petitioner. Mr.AR Nikub, PP, for the respondent State. ... BY THE COURT : Heard learned counsel for the parties. The instant misc. petition has been preferred by the petitioner challenging the order dated 29.1.2009 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Parbatsar rejecting the revision petition filed by him against the order dated 2.9.2008 passed by learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Parbatsar in Criminal Case No.10/1996 whereby charge was framed against the petitioner for the offence under Section 7/16 of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 (for short the Act of 1954). Succinctly stated the facts necessary for the disposal SB C...

Tag this Judgment!

May 30 2012 (HC)

Subhash Modak and ors Vs. State and anr

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

Decided on : May-30-2012

SB Criminal Misc. Petition No.1594/2010 Subhash Modak & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Anr. (1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR. ::: JUDGMENT ::: S.B. Criminal Misc. Petition No.1594/2010 Subhash Modak & Ors. vs. State of Raj. & Anr. Date of Judgment ::30. May, 2012. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MEHTA Mr.Mahendra Singh a/w Mr.Hemant Ballani, for the petitioners. Mr.AR Nikub, PP, for the respondent State. Mr.Rakesh Arora, for the respondent no.2. ... BY THE COURT : Reportable Heard learned counsel for the parties. The instant misc. petition has been filed by the petitioners seeking quashing of the FIR No.258/2010 registered at the P.S. Kotwali, Dungarpur for the offences under Sections 420, 406 and 120B I.P.C. Succinctly stated the facts necessary for the disposal of the instant misc. petition are that the petitioner no.3 Mahindra Gujarat Tractor Ltd. is a company having its registered office at Vadodara. The company is involved in manufacture and sale of tractors...

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 15 2012 (HC)

Rajesh Purohit @ Bholiya Vs. State

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

Decided on : Dec-15-2012

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR ORDER S.B.CRL. MISC. BAIL APPLICATION NO. 7770/2012 Rajesh Purohit @ Bholiya Vs. State of Raj. Date of order :15. h December, 2012 HON'BLE SHRI SANDEEP MEHTA, J.Mr. N.K.Bohra, for the petitioner. Mr. Anil Joshi,P.P. REPORTABLE Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the case diary. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. by the petitioner Rajesh Purohit @ Bholiya s/o Late Rameshchandra Goriya who has been arrested in C.R. No. 59/2012 registered at Police Station Khanda Falsa, Jodhpur for the offences under Sections 274, 275, 276, 420, 120-B I.P.C. and 103, 104 Trade Mark Act and Section 17-B & 27 Drugs & Cosmetics Act. Succinctly stated the facts of the case are that the S.H.O. P.S. Khanda Falsa, Jodhpur as well as the Drug Control Officer, Jodhpur received a source information regarding the 2 transaction of spurious Mero-CD, Merosul(Meropenam) injections. T...

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 19 2012 (HC)

Manish Mathur Vs. State of Raj. and anr

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

Decided on : Dec-19-2012

(1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR ORDER S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.12684/2012 Manish Mathur Versus State of Rajasthan & Anr. Date of Order :19. 12.2012 PRESENT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOVIND MATHUR Mr. Kuldeep Mathur for the petitioner Mr. M.A. Siddiqui for the respondents BY THE COURT : While working as Foreman-I in the Department of Mines and Geology, a criminal case was registered against the petitioner at Anti Corruption Bureau Outpost, Jodhpur, Police Station Anti Corruption Bureau, Jaipur on 05.08.2010 for the offences punishable under Section 7, 13(1)(d) and 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (for short, hereinafter referred to as 'the Act of 1988') and Section 201 of the Indian Penal Code. As a consequent to lodging of the case aforesaid, the petitioner was placed under suspension under an order dated 23.08.2010 passed by the Director, Mines and Geology. Under a letter dated 26.09.2010, the Director, Mines and Geology, Government of Rajastha...

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //