Differ - Judgment Search Results

Price Waterhouse Vs. Hopkins

Court: US Supreme Court

..... motivation the factfinder is entitled to presume that the employer s discriminatory animus made a difference to the outcome absent proof to the contrary from the employer where a disparate ..... the threshold standard i would adopt for shifting the burden of persuasion to the defendant differs substantially from that proposed by the plurality the plurality s suggestion to the contrary notwithstanding .....

State Transport Accounts Association and Etc. Etc. Vs. Orissa State Ro ...

Court: Orissa

Reported in: (1992)ILLJ397Ori

..... laid down in the aforesaid decisions the following questions fall for consideration i whether different types of workshops atdifferent places maintained by the corporation are factories dealing with the ..... within the corporation engaged in manufacturing process although the factories may be located in different stations and zones they constitute an integrated whole and form specific units of the .....

Finley Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

..... claims involving particular parties does not confer jurisdiction over additional claims by or against different parties even if consideration of the additional claims would promote judicial economy and ..... particular parties does not itself confer jurisdiction over additional claims by or against different parties our decision today reaffirms that interpretive rule the opposite would sow confusion .....

Chan Vs. Korean Air Lines, Ltd.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... misled by the inadequate notice would not be compensated equitably another possible explanation for the difference in treatment is that the limitations on liability prescribed for baggage and freight are ..... the carrier must deliver a passenger ticket which shall contain the following particulars stated differently all are obligatory id at 28 translation mine this is also the conclusion reached .....

Texas Monthly, Inc. Vs. Bullock

Court: US Supreme Court

..... agricultural items and property used in the manufacture of articles for ultimate sale for different purposes does not rescue the exemption for religious periodicals from invalidation what is crucial ..... effect as state subsidies for establishment clause purposes such indirect economic benefit is significantly different the grant of a tax exemption is not sponsorship since the government does not .....

Union of India Vs. M/S. Ajit Mehta and Associates, Pune and Others

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: AIR1990Bom45; 1989(3)BomCR535

..... not it appears that thereafter the arbitrators in each case proceeded with the arbitration fixing different dates of hearing in arbitration proceedings involved in first appeal no 21 of 1987 the ..... no claim certificates without reservations pass receipts in full and final settlement of theent at different levels are involved in them the modus operandi is simple the contractors submit their final .....

B. Ramesh Vs. University of Health Sciences, Vijayawada and Others

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: AIR1991AP1

..... provision in art 371d enabling the president to make different provisions for different parts of the state the order passed by the ..... providing equitable opportunities and facilities for the people belonging to different parts of the state in the matter of public ..... that the seats in super specialities are equitably distributed among different local areas he relied on the following observation of lord .....

Abdul Majid Vs. Income-tax Officer and ors.

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Reported in: (1989)77CTR(MP)193; [1989]178ITR616(MP)

..... 84 acceptedthose returns therefore the impugned notices could not be issued merely because of the difference of opinion between the two valuers it has also been strenuously argued that there was ..... mind about the concealment of some income and the report of the departmental valuer being different from the report of the approved valuer therefore the income tax officer could not issue .....

Parimala Agencies Vs. State of Orissa and ors.

Court: Orissa

Reported in: [1990]76STC319(Orissa)

..... gudakhu pan masala gundi zarda and snuff contain tobacco still each item is understood differently and as different commodity by any customer and no customer whether literate or illiterate would confuse ..... government has accepted chewing tobacco gudakhu pan masala gundi zarda and snuff to be a different class from tobacco and all its products subsequently chewing tobacco was also exempted from .....

Fort Wayne Books, Inc. Vs. Indiana

Court: US Supreme Court

..... punishments are greater than those for obscenity violations there is no constitutionally significant difference between them the stiffer rico punishments may provide an additional deterrent to those ..... greater than that for obscenity violations we do not perceive any constitutionally significant difference between the two potential punishments footnote 8 indeed the indiana rico provisions in .....