Differ - Judgment Search Results

Collector of Customs Vs. Mansingka Brothers

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta

Reported in: (1987)(13)LC717Tri(Kol.)kata

..... hon ble calcutta high court held that ordinary portland cement and white cement were two different and distinct commercial commodities in oswal oil refinery madras v collector of customs madras 1984 ..... in the appendices of the import policy k in the circumstances palm fatty acid is different distinct and distinguishable from palm stearine fatty acid both technically and commercially and therefore this .....

JaIn Exports Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Collector of Customs and Central

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in: (1987)(11)LC545Tri(Mum.)bai

..... court had also observed that while contending that the industrial coconut oil was a different commodity from coconut oil canalised for import control purposes the appellants had claimed exemption ..... similar goods imported in similar circumstances had been cleared by the customs authorities at different ports without taking any objection that in instances where objection was taken the authorities .....

Raymond Woollen Mills Ltd. Vs. Income-tax Officer

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Reported in: (1986)18ITD64(Mum.)

..... production starting with different raw materials purchased at different times at different rates different levies fiscal and otherwise and also different items of expenditure on different lots at different times in addition ..... other several items of expenditure are incurred at different times in fact for different years for different purposes and at different rates for instance units of raw materials .....

Jayashree Insulators Limited Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (1987)(28)ELT279TriDel

..... the president for deciding the following question which appeared to represent the basic point of difference whether the expression undue hardship in the proviso to section 35f central excises and ..... it need hardly be said that interpretation of common nouns like the above is quite different from the interpretation of abstract qualities like hardship truth or democracy widely varying meanings could .....

PGandE; Vs. Public Utilities Comm'n

Court: US Supreme Court

..... used to print candidate replies nothing in tornillo suggests that the result would have been different had the florida supreme court decided that the newspaper space needed to print candidates ..... interests as well as a rational basis nor did the court treat the expenditure limitations differently because the governmental justification was less important instead the relatively greater effect of these .....

Wygant Vs. Jackson Bd. of Educ.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... three separate lawsuits no such determination ever has been made although its litigation position was different the board in jackson i and jackson ii denied the existence of prior discriminatory hiring ..... be generated by the combination of economic conditions and the special contractual protection given a different group of teachers a protection that as discussed above was justified by a valid and .....

Smith Vs. Murray

Court: US Supreme Court

..... adopt an accusatorial rather than an inquisitorial system of justice footnote 10 reflect a different choice that choice is to afford the individual certain protections the right against compelled ..... the separate opinions of a majority of the individual justices has recognized that the qualitative difference of death from all other punishments requires a correspondingly greater degree of scrutiny of .....

Mcmillan Vs. Pennsylvania

Court: US Supreme Court

..... in specht observed that following trial the colorado defendant was confronted with a radically different situation from the usual sentencing proceeding the same simply is not true under the ..... on nothing more than the continued functioning of the democratic process to appreciate the difference between aggravating and mitigating circumstances it is important to remember that although states may .....

Goldman Vs. Weinberger

Court: US Supreme Court

..... garments orthodox jews wearing tzitzit and catholics wearing crosses and scapulars that they come from different faiths and ethnic backgrounds is not a secret that can or should be kept from ..... directly government agencies are not free to define their own interests in uniform treatment of different faiths that function has been assigned to the first amendment the first amendment requires that .....

Thornburgh Vs. Amer. Coll. of Obstetricians

Court: US Supreme Court

..... s history and tradition the issues in the cases cited differ from those at stake where abortion is concerned as the ..... her pregnancy that decision must be recognized as sui generis different in kind from the others that the court has protected ..... success and what is more important ignores the significant procedural differences between preliminary and permanent injunctions the court of appeals was convinced .....