Differ - Judgment Search Results

Ftc Vs. Simplicity Pattern Co., Inc.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... of commerce and the foregoing shall then not be construed to permit differentials based on differences in quantities greater than those so fixed and established and provided further that nothing herein ..... before the commission the possibility that this tailoring of services and facilities to meet the different needs of two classes of customers in fact constituted proportionally equal terms and of .....

P.R. Narayanaswami Iyer Vs. Union of India (Uoi), by General Manager, ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1959)2MLJ479

..... that in its railway activity the central government has created separate legal entities like the different railway systems called the southern railway the western railway etc one finds no authority either ..... and administered by them traffic passing through the railway of one or more of such different railway companies gave rise to claims for compensation the contracting railway wherein the traffic .....

Abbate Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

..... they are based upon the violation of two statutes designed to vindicate different governmental interests and requiring different evidence to support convictions although the court considered that it was ..... is that the mere fact that there are two statutes which vindicate different interests and require different evidence of itself means that the fifth amendment does not prohibit successive .....

British Oxygen Co. Vs. South of Scotland Electricity Board. British Ox ...

Court: House of Lords

..... wider basis of taking into account the whole circumstances meticulous justice would require different charges for different consumers and would prevent any large scale grouping the 1947 act for the ..... decide the question of undue preference or discrimination without evidence accordingly although perhaps for different reasons from those moving the majority of their lordships of the second division i .....

Ratan Kumari Tholia Vs. Sunder Lal Tholia and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR1959Cal787

..... with coparcenary property section 8 deals with property other than coparcenary property by itself such difference would not entitle the court to give a restricted meaning to the word property in ..... in respect of properties situate within british india the position as regards immovable property is different because according to the well established rule of international law the law of domicile does .....

Seth Sukhlall Chandanmull Vs. A.C. Jain, Income Tax Officer and anr.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR1959Cal444,[1959]37ITR101(Cal)

..... taking of property without payment of compensation i find it difficult to agree that the differences in income have no rational connection with that object obviously the compulsory taking by ..... once this conclusion is reached we get an additional reason for holding that the differences in income between different groups which form the basis of the classification have rational connection with the .....

Bengal Agricultural and Industrial Corporation Ltd. Vs. Corporation of ...

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR1960Cal123

..... against the defendants separately the civil procedure code however permits the joinder of defendants and different causes of action against different defendants in a single suit it therefore follows that in a case ..... favour of the plaintiff are derived from the same indenture the causes of action are different the plaintiff could have instituted this suit to enforce one right only abandoning the .....

Sugandha Mohan Bhattacharjee Vs. N.M. Mukherjee and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR1960Cal521,64CWN494

..... letters patent for a declaration that certain alleged meetings of the defendant company held at different dates mentioned in the plaint and certain resolutions passed at the said meetings are illegal ..... originally filed 2 there cannot be any question that the proposed amendment introduces a substantially different cause of action 3 the applications are opposed on the ground that no leave under .....

Nellie Wapshare and ors. Vs. Pierce Leslie and Co. Ltd. and ors.

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR1960Mad410; (1960)IIMLJ401

..... the ambit of the same record of facts and probabilities attempts the application of somewhat different legal concepts to those facts it is only proper that the contentions per contra ..... certainly permissive during this period it is obviously illegitimate to tack on two different periods of possession by different parties under totally distinct sources of title or interest to compute a period .....

Anant Chintaman Lagu Vs. the State of Bombay

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1960SC500; (1960)62BOMLR371; 1960CriLJ682; [1960]2SCR460

..... courts below though the arrangement and consideration of the relevant evidence on record is somewhat different it is now necessary to consider the arguments which have been advanced on behalf of ..... of misappropriating her properties i quite concede however that these circumstances may take on a different colour from other circumstances but i have found no such circumstance the next circumstance is .....