Differ - Judgment Search Results

Jones Vs. Rath Packing

Court: US Supreme Court

..... adjust their packing process to account for this differential either by packing different quantities into different packages and then tracing their distribution or by overpacking all packages ..... 32 the legislative history however suggests that the statute expressly preempts as requiring different information only state laws governing net quantity labeling which impose requirements inconsistent .....

E. I. Du Pont De Nemours and Co. Vs. Train

Court: US Supreme Court

..... facilities involved the process applied or other such factors related to such discharger are fundamentally different from the factors considered in establishing the limitations see e g for the two ..... less likely that congress intended regulations governing existing sources to be reviewable in two different forums depending on whether the regulations require compliance in 1977 or 1983 footnote 19 .....

Bates Vs. State Bar of Arizona

Court: US Supreme Court

..... public in ignorance because of the possibility however that the differences among professions might bring different constitutional considerations into play we specifically reserved judgment as to ..... the distinctions historical and functional between professions may require consideration of quite different factors physicians and lawyers for example do not dispense standardized products they .....

Eastern Commercial Corporation Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh

Court: Himachal Pradesh

Reported in: AIR1977HP74

..... exercise that power therefore the concept of power and the concept of jurisdiction are undoubtedly different concepts but whenever a particular authority is given jurisdiction to do a particular thing the ..... arbitrators or umpire be necessary this section enumerates five items for investing the arbitrator with different types of power none of these five items can be construed as investing the .....

S.P.S. Selvaraj and ors. Vs. Edward Nadar and ors.

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1977)2MLJ441

..... both the plaintiffs trade mark and the defendants trade mark are entirely different there is no similarity at all neither the size of the ..... has not appreciated the fact that both the size of the different labels and the colour scheme adopted will clearly go to show ..... of football another mark may show players in a different dress and in very different positions yet the idea conveyed by each might be .....

The Commissioner of Income-tax, Gujarat, Ahmedabad Vs. Kamalini Khatau

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: AIR1978Guj162; [1978]112ITR652(Guj)

..... income which is subjected to tax albeit only once in different hands optionally in the hands of the beneficiary it is subjected to ..... of him beneficially the points of time of receipt might differ but since a special provision is made to tax the trustee in ..... exercises option under the last part of section 164 the different points of receipt lose all significance once this legal position is appreciated .....

Mohinder Singh Gill and anr. Vs. the Chief Election Commissioner, New ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1978SC851; (1978)1SCC405; [1978]2SCR272

..... the state has the authority to retire a servant on superannuation the situation here is different we are not in the province of substantive rights but procedural rights statutorily regulated sometimes ..... a notification was issued by the chief election commissioner with a calendar of dates for different parliamentary constituencies in the country in this appeal we are concerned with no 13 ferozepore .....

Nandlal Sohanlal, Jullundur Vs. the Commissioner of Income-tax, Patial ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: AIR1977P& H320; [1977]110ITR170(P& H)

..... the dissolution and re constitution of the firm are two different and distinct legal concepts since the original partnership deed did ..... defined in the act but that does not make any difference because the legislature has employed compendious phraseology for covering the ..... existence of two separate and distinct entities owned by two different groups of persons and none of the old partners should .....

Brij Gopal Denga and ors. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and anr.

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Reported in: AIR1978MP122

..... is employed here also clause 3 of article 228a could be differently worded by parliament for instance it could have used an expression ..... words would be defeating that legislative intention and laying down a different legislative policy this the court has no power to do ..... one could argue follow the convention that when the two judges differed the matter deserved admission for final hearing but what if .....

The Additional Commissioner of Income-tax, (Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad) ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: [1977]110ITR468(AP)

..... and allocated the profits among the respective partners who constituted the firm in the two different periods against this decision of the income tax officer the matter was taken in appeal ..... in that judgement is worth quoting the dissolution and reconstitution of a partnership are two different legal concepts the dissolution puts an end to the partnership but reconstitution keeps it subsisting .....