Differ - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: differ Year: 1958 Page 1 of about 1,497 results (0.071 seconds)Bhikusa Yamasa Kshatriya Vs. Sangamner Akola Taluka Bidi Kamgar Union
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jun-30-1958
Reported in: (1959)61BOMLR764; (1959)IILLJ578Bom
..... state government was a good board it consisted of independent men belonging to different industries and different places and with minds free from predilections and prejudices to the board of ..... uniform that the quantum of production conditions of labour and transport facilities in different places were different etc etc it is therefore apparent that the notification proceeded upon a classification .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTS.M. Sriramulu Naidu Vs. Employees' State Insurance Corporation throug ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-25-1958
Reported in: AIR1959Mad457; (1958)IILLJ596Mad; (1958)2MLJ544
..... process though the terms under section 2 clause m are somewhat different from those under sub clause 12 of section 2 of ..... is not capable of being built upon the so called difference in these two definitions of the term factory employed in ..... the factories act whereas the other departments which were functioning for different purposes were not recognised as factories apparently in the carpentry .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGore Vs. United States
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-30-1958
..... single purpose to outlaw nonmedicinal sales of narcotics they grew out of three different laws enacted at different times for each of which congress has provided a separate punishment and congress ..... social evil as deleterious as it is difficult to combat does not make the several different regulatory controls single and identic in blockburger the offender was indicted convicted and cumulatively .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAlbert Judah Judah Vs. Rampada Gupta and anr.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Mar-03-1958
Reported in: AIR1959Cal715,[1960]30CompCas582(Cal)
..... identical the cause of action in the suit withdrawn was different from the cause of action in the subsequent suit then ..... shareholders and common directors the two companies in law are two different persons even though they have some common share holders or ..... director took part in the meetings wherein shares were allotted to different applicants the defendant joined the other two directors in writing .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPranballav Saha and anr. Vs. Sm. Tulsibala Dassi and anr.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: May-16-1958
Reported in: AIR1958Cal713,63CWN258
..... for consideration it can be impeached if the consideration is immoral and it makes no difference whether the transaction is executed or executory that great and erudite judge sir subrahmania ayyar ..... transaction by statute but a voidable one under the common law two significant and outstanding differences have been ignored in our desire to follow the english precedents one is the uncritical .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTShyamlal Roy Vs. Madhusudan Roy and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Aug-01-1958
Reported in: AIR1959Cal380
..... saha are partnership businesses in which the kartas of the four branches representing the four different families are the partners along with some outsiders the remaining one namely gangasagar ananda mohan ..... according to mr sen the learned counsel for the plaintiff shows that this partnership is different from an ordinary partnership family members who are not partners have been given certain rights .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAluminium Corporation of India Ltd. Vs. Coal Board
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Sep-11-1958
Reported in: AIR1959Cal222
..... and somewhat ambiguous meaning it seems to have received different interpretations under different constitutions but one characteristic of it which has been ..... belongs to a line of decisions concerned with a very different point arising under the constitution of canada in canada a ..... raw material should be used to turn out something altogether different but it is still required that they should be .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTW. Wood and Son Ltd. Vs. Bengal Corporation
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jan-21-1958
Reported in: AIR1959Cal8
..... contractual disputes to arbitration made by parties who are subject to the jurisdiction of different signatory states shall be recognised as valid in every signatory state even though ..... arbitration agreements themselves it is arbitration agreements made between parties belonging to jurisdictions of different states that the protocol recognises and what section 3 of the act contemplates isobviously .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPratul Chandra Mukherjee and ors. Vs. Chairman, Calcutta Dock Labour B ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: May-29-1958
Reported in: AIR1958Cal636
..... paragraph 1 of this clause the board may fix different percentages for different categories of work or workers provided that the percentages ..... is provided for in sub clause 1 to fix different percentages for different categories of workers in other words to the liberty ..... a is concerned may well include workers of all the different categories mentioned in the schedule and similarly paragraph b which .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTS.S. Subbier and Vs. Commissioner of Excess Profits Tax, Madras
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-03-1958
Reported in: AIR1959Mad271; [1959]35ITR362(Mad)
..... created by the partnership deed of 23rd june 1944 is different from the firm created by the partnership deed of 23rd ..... bhavanagar and the question was whether these two partnerships constitute two different firms or whether the three partners carry on the same ..... thereafter the same members carried on business at two different places under two different names one business was in nandyal and the other .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial