Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: dehra dun act 1871 Page 1 of about 279,461 results (0.301 seconds)

Mar 09 1891 (FN)

Peake Vs. New Orleans

Court : US Supreme Court

..... for any purposes except those expressly limited in the statute -- those issued in payment for excavations and levees authorized to be made by the act of 1871, and the preceding acts. and why? for a reason entirely in harmony with the whole tendency of the entire series of statutes and with the requirements of good ..... by the original board . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 500,714.43 2. ditto in the second district . . . . . 289,907.40 3. levy made by the city, under the act of 1871, in the third district . . 627,589.95 4. ditto in the fourth district . . . . . 281,416.81 ------------ total amount chargeable . . . . . . $1,699,628.58 this sum includes the assessments ..... assessment proceedings had proceeded page 139 u. s. 358 so far that there was a large apparent obligation of the city to the drainage fund. in 1871, an act of the legislature is passed, empowering the canal company to complete the work, transferring to a subordinate administrative body of the city all assessments theretofore made, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 23 1966 (HC)

Janardan Sahu Vs. Arakhit Sahu

Court : Orissa

Reported in : AIR1967Ori150; 33(1967)CLT226; 1967CriLJ1354

..... to show that the learn ed magistrate, who tried the case, was authorised to receive and try charges as contemplated in section 20 of the cattle trespass act, 1871. unfortunately this point does not seem to have been raised on behalf of the petitioner before the learned magistrate himself, nor there is any material before me ..... has been lawfully closed to grazing shall be deemed to be cattle doing damage to a public plantation within the meaning of section 11 of the cattle trespass act. 1871 and may be seized and impounded as such by any forest officer or police officer.'' so under the terms of this section, reserved forest and protected forest ..... magistrate on hearing the parties passed the aforesaid order against which the petitioner has now come in revision to this court. 3. under section 11 of the cattle trespass act, 1871, persons authorised to seize, or cause to be seized, any cattle doing damage are the persons in charge of public roads, pleasure grounds, plantations, canals, drainage .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 22 1989 (FN)

Jett Vs. Dallas Indep. Sch. Dist.

Court : US Supreme Court

..... brought within the ambit of the civil action authorized by that statute") (internal quotations omitted). iii we think the history of the 1866 act and the 1871 act recounted above indicates that congress intended that the explicit remedial provisions of 1983 be controlling in the context of damages actions brought against state actors ..... through the express remedy for damages contained in 1983. see chapman, supra, at 441 u. s. 617 (footnote omitted) (section 1 of the 1871 act "served only to ensure that an individual had a cause of action for violations of the constitution, which in the fourteenth amendment embodied and extended to ..... although the debate surrounding the constitutional principles established in prigg, dennison, and day occurred in the context of the sherman amendment, and not 1 of the 1871 act, in monell we found it quite inconceivable that the same legislators who opposed vicarious liability on constitutional grounds in the sherman amendment debates would have silently .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 01 1970 (FN)

Adickes Vs. S. H. Kress and Co.

Court : US Supreme Court

..... scheme of remedies -- civil, criminal, and military [ footnote 3/16 ] --for the protection of constitutional rights from all major interference. in the 1871 act, congress undertook to provide broad federal civil remedies against interference with the exercise and actual enjoyment of constitutional rights, particularly the right to equal protection. section ..... subject to varying interpretation. finally, the court dwells on the relative lack of controversy over 1983 in contrast to the heated debate over 2 of the 1871 act. however, despite senator edmunds' complacent prediction, 1983 was opposed, and opposed vigorously. senator johnston commented, "the senator from vermont [senator edmunds] said ..... at 365 u. s. 726 -727 (stewart, j., concurring). see also mulkey v. reitman, supra. [ footnote 3/15 ] as originally enacted, 1 of the 1871 act provided: "that any person who, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage of any state, shall subject, or cause to be subjected .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 14 1912 (PC)

V. Balakrishnudu Vs. Narayanasawmy Chetty

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1914)ILR37Mad175; 24Ind.Cas.852

..... demand as a special class of loans which ought to have a special starting point. accordingly instead of one article dealing with loans payable on demand (article 58 in the act of 1871) they provided two articles 59 and 60 with different starting points. there is nothing to suggest that they thought deposits of money were covered by article 145. on the ..... be used and other things of the same nature and quality are to be returned instead. in my opinion there is no ground for holding that in the acts of 1859 and 1871 the word deposit in the sections and articles already referred to included so-called deposits of money or other things which were not intended to be kept but to ..... of 'deposition' (obviously a misprint for depositum) with which all lawyers are familiar.' i would venture to go even further and to say that when as in the acts of 1859 and 1871 there is nothing to suggest the use of the word deposit in any other sense it must be taken to mean the sort of bailment known to lawyers under .....

Tag this Judgment!

1879

County of Cass Vs. Gillett

Court : US Supreme Court

..... reads as follows: "the 8th, 9th, 10th, 11th, 12th, 13th, 14th, 15th, 16th, 17th, 18th, 19th, 20th, 21st, and 22d sections of an act entitled 'an act to incorporate the osage valley and southern kansas railroad company, approved nov. 21, 1857,' are hereby reenacted and declared to be applicable to the company hereby incorporated, and all ..... the county court of cass county, missouri " " $50] harrisonville, cass county, missouri, feb. 1, 1871 [$50" "the county of cass acknowledges itself to owe and promises to pay to the bearer fifty dollars, on the first day of august, 1873, at the national park bank ..... under the order thereof, attesting the same and affixing the seal of said court, at the town of harrisonville, county of cass, aforesaid, this first day of february, a.d. 1871." "jehiel c. stevenson" " presiding justice of the county court of cass county, missouri " "attest:" "[seal of cass county court]" "c. h. dore" " clerk of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 20 1885 (FN)

Poindexter Vs. Greenhow

Court : US Supreme Court

..... said petition." the contract which the plaintiff in error alleges has been violated is with the state of virginia, and is contained in the act of march 30, 1871, known as the "funding act," entitled "an act to provide for the funding and payment of the public debt," and in the bonds and coupons issued under its authority. it provided ..... the public sense of duty to the public creditors. the only security for their performance was the public faith. but immediately on the passage of the act of march 30, 1871, and thereafter, occasional or continued default in the payment of interest on the bonds issued in pursuance of its provisions by reason of failures to provide ..... holder deserve to be further explained. it was evidently a part of the consideration on which the creditors of the state were induced to accept, under the act of march 30, 1871, from the state of virginia, new obligations for two-thirds of their claim, in exchange for the surrender of the original bonds. the latter depended for .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 13 1899 (FN)

New Orleans Vs. Warner

Court : US Supreme Court

..... the drainage plant, declared that the consideration should be paid in drainage warrants, issued in the same form and manner as those theretofore issued under the act of 1871 for work done. this act of 1871 provided that, if there should not be sufficient funds to cash the warrants when issued, the administrator of finance was required to endorse upon them the ..... upon $6,000 of warrants given for the purchase of the drainage plant. the obligations of the city with respect to these are measured not by the act of 1871, but by the act of february 24, 1876, authorizing such purchase, and by the contract of sale, wherein the city agrees to facilitate by all lawful means the collection of ..... the benefit of the warrant holders, by the issue and delivery of bonds to the amount of $1,672,105.21 to take up drainage warrants issued under the act of 1871, all of which were used and applied at various times between may 10, 1872, and december 31, 1874, to the redemption of drainage warrants. that the city .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 31 1969 (HC)

Mazhar HusaIn and anr. Vs. Nidhi Lal

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : (1885)ILR7All230

..... on the one hand, that jurisdiction to hear a 'munsif's case' is given to a subordinate judge by the terms of section 19 of the bengal civil courts act (vi of 1871); that jurisdiction can be ousted only by express provision of law, which in this case does not exist; that in the analogous case of mufassal small cause court ..... that it is impossible, after comparing the two statutes, which are in pari materia, to arrive at any such conclusion. my own view is that section 19 of act vi of 1871 refers to the civil procedure code merely as a matter of convenience. section 15 of the civil procedure code is a rule of procedure, not of jurisdiction; and whilst it lays down that ..... on this ground it is contended by the learned pleader for the appellant that sections 15 and 25 of the code must be considered as part and parcel of act vi of 1871, and therefore form a rule of jurisdiction, and that the effect is to limit the jurisdiction of the subordinate judge to suits of which the subject-matter exceeds .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 02 1884 (PC)

Vijaya Ragava Vs. the Secretary of State for India in Council

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1883)ILR7Mad466

..... , j.42. on the 8th february 1882 the plaintiff in this case was elected to be a municipal commissioner of salem under section 9 of the towns' improvement act (madras act iii), 1871, and under the provisions of that section he was entitled to continue in office for three years. the section, however, goes on to provide that 'the governor ..... plaintiff was elected by the rate-payers of salem one of the municipal commissioners of that town, under the provisions of section 9 of the towns' improvement act (madras act iii of 1871).2. notification of his election was published in the gazette of the 23rd of february 1882 and he entered on the duties of his office.3. in ..... there was admittedly no misconduct or neglect by the plaintiff.18. i am unable to see that the argument of the advocate-general is consistent with section 9 of act iii of 1871. if the general discretion contended for was intended by the legislature, the words 'for misconduct or neglect of duty' may be omitted as useless, inasmuch as .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //