Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: dehra dun act 1871 Court: patna Page 1 of about 2,844 results (0.080 seconds)

Jan 09 1997 (HC)

Girdhari Lal Jatana and ors. Vs. State of Bihar and anr.

Court : Patna

..... accused that the chaykrata court had no jurisdiction in the matter inasmuch as the offence under section 403, penal code must be deemed to have been committed at dehra dun. in the facts and circumstances of the case their lordships had held as under:-but the main question for our consideration is not whether if section 179 applies ..... is not applicable at all. learned counsel further submitted that even assuming that the petitioners committed those offences the same were completed at new delhi and no overt-act was done at patna and therefore, the entire proceeding is vitiated in law. mr. khan secondly, submitted that the complaint petition on the fact of it, ..... (rupees fifty thousands) only and one piece of land at delhi for which complainant was brutally assaulted by all the accused persons on her refusal to do act according to their whims and direction.that the complainant was subjected upto high degree of cruelty and tortured physically as well as mentally which is very much apparent .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 09 1999 (HC)

DIn Bandhu Mandal @ Mandal and ors. and Vs. State of Bihar

Court : Patna

..... police station at narayanpur on the basis of which a case under sections 304/34 & 498a, indian penal code and section 3 and 4 of the dowry prohibition act was registered against these three appellants and aloka mandal, wife of din bandhu mandal. the entire prosecution case is contained in the fardbeyan of birinchi mandal, which formed the ..... according to the available evidence, full dowry was not paid to them before or after marriage and they were demanding balance amount. their conviction under the dowry prohibition act is amply justified but their conviction under section 304b i.p.c. is not proved. prafulla mandal the husband of the deceased was liable for the death of his ..... and bharat mandal in criminal appeal no. 50 of 1998 under section 304b i.p.c. is set aside. their conviction under sections 3 and 4, dowry prohibition act is confirmed. so for the question of sentence is concerned, their sentence is reduced to the period already undergone by them. criminal appeal no. 112 of 1998 is .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 14 1999 (HC)

Kali Charan Rai and ors. Vs. State of Bihar

Court : Patna

..... section 304b of the indian penal code and their conviction is set aside.(b) appellant no. 2 bishwanath rai is convicted under sections 3 and 4 of the dowry prohibition act as also under section 498a of the indian penal code and sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for three years under section 498a, i.p.c., two years under section 3 of ..... dowry prohibition act and three months under section 4 of the dowry prohibition act. he has remained in custody for about six years i.e. more than the sentence awarded to him. now, he has been ordered to be .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 30 2002 (HC)

Krishna Bihar Pandey and ors. Vs. State

Court : Patna

..... were sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for life on these counts. though din dayal pandey, nirmal kumar pandey and narayan pandey suffered conviction also under section 27 of the arms act, no sentence was awarded to them on that count.2. at the outset, i may refer the salient features of the prosecution case centering round the incident in question. the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 06 2001 (HC)

Mahi Kant Chaudhary and ors. Vs. State of Bihar and anr.

Court : Patna

..... application has come up before this court under article 227 of the constitution of india. it is well settled that while deciding any matter under this provision this court cannot act as if sitting in appeal or in revision, thereby circumventing the provision of procedural law. this power is to be utilised only in extremely exceptional cases.5. the order of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 11 2000 (HC)

Qamrunnisa Vs. State of Bihar and anr.

Court : Patna

..... . 2 conceded in course of the argument that he has already complied with the order of revisional court.10. section 3 of the muslim women (protection of rights on divorce) act, 1986 enuntiates as under:mahr or other properties of muslim woman to be given to her at the time of divorce-(1) notwithstanding anything contained in any other law for ..... the petitioner on 14.1.1992 and thereafter, the petitioner had filed a misc. case no. 11/92 under section 3 of the muslim women (protection of right on divorce) act, 1986 against the opposite party no. 2 to pay den mehar, expenses for iddat period and rs. 13,000/- paid by her father for purchase of colour t.v. and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 23 2008 (HC)

Begum Sayeeda @ Sayeeda Khatoon Vs. State of Bihar and anr.

Court : Patna

..... another, or (c) where an offence is a continuing one, and continues to be committed in more local areas than one, or (d) where it consists of several acts done in different local areas, it may be inquired into or tried by a court having jurisdiction over any of such local areas.'6. mr. shakeel ahmad khan, senior ..... learned chief judicial magistrate, katihar after inquiry found a prima facie case under sections 498a and 323 of the indian penal code and 3/4 of the dowry prohibition act, against the accused persons including the petitioner named in the petition of complaint and ordered for issuance of summons to face trial.4. being aggrieved by and dissatisfied with ..... order dated ist may, 2007 taking cognizance of the offence under sections 498a and 323 of the indian penal code and under sections 3 & 4 of the dowry prohibition act by the chief judicial magistrate, katihar.2. shama yasmin filed a petition of complaint dated 26.3.2007 in the court of the chief judicial magistrate, katihar, against .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 01 2009 (HC)

Tri Vikram Mishra S/O Late Ram Prasad Mishra and ors. Vs. State of Bih ...

Court : Patna

Reported in : 2009(57)BLJR2815

..... petition no. 1252(m) of 2004 was filed by the complainant before the learned chief judicial magistrate, patna, on 17.5.2004 wherein no allegation of any overt act against these petitioners have been made and all accusations related to the husband. thereafter the husband filed h.m.a. no. 371 of 2004 under section 13(1)(ia ..... them admittedly had taken place in birganj in nepal which was beyond jurisdiction of indian territory and neither the provisions of the penal code nor the dowry prohibition act would apply to the petitioners of that case. it was also submitted that the alleged allegations regarding the occurrence taking place at delhi and attempt to kill her ..... by the learned sub divisional judicial magistrate, patna, whereby cognizance has been taken under sections 498a and 406 ipc as also section 3/4 of the dowry prohibition act and having been heard together are being disposed of by this common order.2. the facts of the complaint case may be noticed with relative brevity. one pushpa .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 01 2007 (HC)

Pramod NaraIn Sharma and ors. Vs. the State of Bihar and anr.

Court : Patna

..... .2004, for the commission of /offences punishable under sections 406, 420 / 120b, 498a, 323, 324 and 307 of indian penal code as also sections 3 and 4 of dowry prohibition act.4. according to the complaint petition, marriage of nirja singh, daughter of the complainant, was solemnised on 10.5.2001 with rajeev sharma, petitioner no. 3 after observance of hindu ..... /04 by the learned sdjm (east), muzaffarpur, whereby and where-under cognizance under sections 406 and 498a of indian penal code as also sections 3 and 4 of dowry prohibition act has been taken against the petitioners.3. the facts of the case ate as follows: one dr. suresh kumar singh, father of nirja singh, had filed a complaint case before .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 14 2004 (HC)

Sona Devi and ors. Vs. State of Bihar

Court : Patna

..... due to demand of dowry. to be more specific, there was nexus between cruelty, harassment and demand of dowry, as such presumption under section 113b of the evidence act, can be drawn against the appellants. thus the prosecution has established the case beyond reasonable doubt against the appellants,15. in the facts and circumstances, i affirm ..... 1998 was instituted for the alleged offence under sections 304b, 201/34 and section 498a of the indian penal code and sections 3/4 of the dowry prohibition act, against all the appellants. after investigation the police submitted charge-sheet. the case was committed to the court of sessions and the trial court convicted the appellants ..... of 1999. appellants suffered conviction under sections 304b/34, 498a and 201 of the indian penal code as well as under section 4 of the dowry prohibition act and have been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life under sections 304-15/34 of the indian penal code, ri for one year each under sections 498a .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //