Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: dehra dun act 1871 Page 11 of about 279,461 results (0.453 seconds)

Sep 12 1969 (SC)

Smt. Munni Devi and anr. Vs. Gokal Chand and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1970SC1727; (1969)2SCC879; [1970]2SCR363

..... that rawel chand was in illegal occupation of the shop. he accordingly issued a notice under section 7a (3) of the act.3. gokal chand then filed a civil suit in the court of the munsif, dehra dun, for a declaration that he was an allottee and a tenant of the shop and that he was in possession in that ..... j. 1. gokal chand-first respondent in this appeal-was a tenant of shop no. 34/2, dispensary road, dehra dun, which belongs to munni devi-the first appellant in this appeal. munni devi applied to the rent control & eviction officer, dehra dun, for an order in ejectment on the plea that gokal chand had committed default in paying rent. the r.c ..... that state of facts exists, and, if they exercise the jurisdiction without its existence, what they do may be questioned, and it will be held that they have acted without jurisdiction. but there is another state of things which may exist. the legislature may entrust the tribunal or body with a jurisdiction which includes the jurisdiction to determine .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 08 2024 (SC)

K.p. Khemka Vs. Haryana State Industrial And Infrastructure Developmen ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... or whether the words refer to only those claims which are legally recoverable.10. relying upon hansraj gupta vs. dehra dun-mussorie electric tramway co. ltd., air1933pc63 the bench in kalliyanikutty (supra) held that the kerala recovery act did not create any new right and that it merely provided a process for speedy recovery. in view of ..... v. kalu ram [(1976) 3 scc407 relying on the privy council decision in hansraj gupta v. dehra dun-mussoorie electric tramway co. ltd. [air1933pc63:60. ia13 this court interpreted section 7 of the public premises (eviction of unauthorised occupants) act, 1958 in a similar way. under that section where any person is in arrears of rent ..... decision in v.r. kalliyanikutty (supra): 9. in the case of hansraj gupta v. dehra dun-mussoorie electric tramway co. ltd. [air1933pc63:60. ia13 the privy council was required to interpret the words money due under section 186 of the companies act, 1913. section 186 dealt with the recovery of any money due to the company from .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 16 1949 (PC)

Habib Ahmed Rizvi Vs. the Crown

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 1950CriLJ817

..... commissioner in his executive capacity and is an administrative and not a judicial order. we respectfully agree with the following observations in sandal singh v. dist. mag. & supdt., dehra dun : air1934all148 . 'the high court would have no power to interfere with orders passed by a district magistrate in his executive capacity.' we may also refer to the oases ..... opinion this letter did not supersede b, 19 which was in born in february 1949. the order of the deputy commissioner is not warranted by section 7 of the act and the relevant permit system rules. we have no power, however, to set aside the order for the reasons stated in the following paragraphs.16. section 491, criminal ..... order. * * * *the question is whether this order is illegal. we may point out that the reference to the ordinance is wrong as it had been repealed by act xxiii [23] of 1949.7. here we may give a short account of the law regulating the control of admission into india of persons from pakistan. the first ordinance .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 19 1974 (SC)

State of Haryana Vs. Gurdial Singh and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1974SC1871,1974CriLJ1286,(1974)4SCC494,[1974]3SCR657

..... two daughters sukhiwan kaur and harjiwan kaur. sukhjeet singh and harjiwan kaur were the only two unmarried children. sukhjeet singh was a student of doon school dehra dun, while harjiwan kaur was studying in another school in dehra dun. both of them were present in their house at shamgarh during the days of the present occurrence having come there during winter vacation. the house ..... of avtar kaur. lal singh was respected like a guru and was known as dadaji. gurinder singh used to consult lal singh deceased with regard to his affairs and generally acted upon the advice of lal singh. when a ceiling on lands'was imposed, gurinder singh, with a view to save some land and prevent its being declared surplus, transferred 23 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 21 1947 (PC)

Dr. Capt. Jatindra Mohan Mitra Vs. Mt. Dayal Devi

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1948All134

..... by the petitioner is not the last will of the testator. the latter was, as i have said, a hindu; the will relied upon by the caveator was made at dehra dun in the united provinces, and it is admitted that it is not such a will as falls within one of the classes specified in clauses (a) and (b) of section ..... this case two considerations must be borne in mind. first, it appears not to have been doubted that both wills were wills to which the provisions of section 213, succession act applied and that, therefore, it was necessary for a person claiming under either will to obtain probate thereof. secondly, the caveator desired to obtain probate of the later will, and ..... 57, succession act. it is not therefore obligatory under section 213 of that act for probate of the will to be obtained before an executor or, a legatee can establish his right under the will, see kanhaiya lal v .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 30 1912 (PC)

Hirdey NaraIn and anr. Vs. M.J. Powell and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : (1913)ILR35All9; 17Ind.Cas.672

..... order that he might ascertain the respective values of the interests of the appellants and mrs. powell in the land in question for which the superintendent of dehra dun has awarded under the land acquisition act a sum of rs. 7,768-8-0. the learned judge rightly, as we think, set himself to ascertain what were the respective rights of the appellants ..... it, that the interest of the appellant in the land was worth no more than rs. 1,060, and that the balance of the sum awarded by the superintendent of dehra dun, namely, rs. 6,708-8-0, should be given to mrs. powell. but in case this court did not agree with the view that mrs. powell was an abadi tenant .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 20 1977 (HC)

Jagannath Vs. District Judge, Mathura and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1977All439

..... of landlord and tenant can arise by conduct.2. admittedly, the shop was taken on rent by sita ram (petitioner's elder brother)nearly 20 years ago who shifted to dehra dun within four or five years and established a separate business. the petitioner is in possession, is running the shop, is paying rent and has licence for running the shop ..... application for release on the finding that subletting was not established. it was further found that the predecessor of the landlord (own brother) accepted the petitioner as tenant before act xiii of 1972 was enforced and complete effects of sita ram had not been removed. the appellate court found possession of the petitioner to be unauthorised. as there was no ..... was sub-tenant, as claimed by the landlord, or he was a tenant in his own right. a contract of tenancy can be express or implied. the rent control act or the urban buildings act does not lay down any specific manner of entering into the agreement, except, where the tenancy is created under the .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 02 1986 (SC)

Dr. K.P. Hajela Vs. N.S. Verma and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1986SC1638; (1986)IILLJ448SC; 1986(1)SCALE1202; (1986)3SCC292; [1986]2SCR967; 1986(2)SLJ272(SC)

..... deputation, the appellant further contended that the first respondent had in fact suffered break in service because of his spells of service at the d.a.v. college, dehra dun and the d.b.s. college, kanpur and as such the first respondent's claim of continuous service was an untenable one. the vice-chancellor upheld the appellant' ..... the commencement of the statutes'.13. the high court has failed to notice that sub-clauses (2) and (4) of old statute 11.34 contemplate different situations and act in different fields. the service contemplated under sub-clause (2) is a distinctly different service and has no bearing with the service rendered in the particular institution in which ..... fulfilled his teaching assignment at the university of aden and on return to india he sought to resume his post in the college. the first respondent who was acting as the head of the department refused to hand over charge on the ground he had attained seniority over the appellant. it is relevant to mention here that .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 28 1932 (PC)

Hansraj Gupta Vs. N.P. Asthana

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (1933)35BOMLR312

..... raghu mal (who will be referred to as the testator) was a shareholder in a company (herein called the company) named the dehra dun-mussoorie electric tramway company, limited, which was incorporated under the indian companies act, 1913, on august 23, 1921. he carried on business under the style of madharam-hardeo das at calcutta and under the style ..... paid to the testator out of the company's funds a sum of rs. 35,000, for which a receipt was given in the following terms;-received from the dehra dun-mussoorie electric tramway company, ltd., the sum of rs. 35,000 (rupees thirty-five thousand) only, being advances for orders placed with us as per their letter ..... suit in the high court of calcutta had been disposed of. this decision turned upon a question of construction of the allahabad high court rules under the indian companies act. the application was, however, also considered on the merits and dismissed, upon the ground that there existed a valid contract to take the shares to which the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 17 1967 (HC)

Commissioner of Income-tax, Uttar Pradesh Vs. Motor and General Sales ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : [1968]68ITR102(All)

..... the directors. they held shares to the tune of rs. 34,000 each. admittedly sarvsri c. m. gupta and m. c. gupta were college students residing at dehra dun and not at lucknow where the business of the company was being transacted. they had no background which could justify the remuneration. they did not carry on the management ..... commissioner for the years 1957-58 and 1958-59 was that they were financiers and had to be compensated for financing the enterprise. section 10(2) (xv) of the act reads :'10. (2) such profits or gains shall be computed after making the following allowances, namely :.....(xv) any expenditure (not being an allowance of the nature described ..... such business, profession or vocation.'allowance could, therefore, be made of an expenditure incurred exclusively for the purpose of the business of the company. section 10(4a) of the act, so far as relevant for our purposes, reads :10. (4a) nothing in sub-section (2) shall, in the computation of the profits and gains of a company, .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //