Court : Allahabad
Reported in : [1960]39ITR617(All)
..... by the income-tax officer to furnish certain information with regard to some investments, particularly in respect of an immovable property standing in his name in connaught place, dehra dun. when called upon to furnish this information, the petitioner sent a letter on april 15, 1953, in which he wrote that he might add for the ..... february 23, 1959, passed by the opposite party, the income-tax officer, 'a' ward, dehra dun. this order of assessment relates to the assessment year 1950-51. for that assessment year no notice under section 22(2) of the income-tax act was issued to the petitioner. a general notice under section 22(1) had been issued as ..... is correct or incorrectu it was urged that, on the determination of this question depended the decision of the question as to whether the income-tax officer acted in exercise of jurisdiction vested in him or in excess of that jurisdiction. this contention raised before us ignores the circumstance that the limitation prescribed by section .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Allahabad
Reported in : AIR1948All382
..... according to law in force then were lawfully enacted as held in district board, dehra dun v. h. trotter : air1939all389 .25. section 143(2), government of india act, 1935, provides that:any taxes which immediately before the commencement of part 3 of this act were being lawfully levied by any local authority for the purposes of the district ..... refers to two decisions of this court district board, dehra dun v. h. trotter : air1939all389 and l. macdowell v. district board, dehra dun ('43) 1943 a.l.w. 84. none of these cases decides the question before us, namely the effect of the enactment of the professions tax limitation act 1941, on sections 108 and 114, u.p. district ..... . i proceed now to examine the above provisions of the district boards act in the light of the two principles mentioned above as -laid down by their lordships of the judicial committee.52. the first case to which i may refer is district board, dehra dun v. damodar dutt : air1944all223 . in that case the district board .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Allahabad
Reported in : AIR1959All7
..... hindu marriage act, 1955 (hereinafter referred to as the act, or the 1955 act), a munsif has jurisdiction to entertain a suit for restitution of conjugal rights where the parties are hindus.2. ranjit singh filed suit no, 306 of 1955 in the court of munsif, dehra dun against smt ..... section 23 deals with apetition for judicial separation. section 32 dealswith a petition for restitution of conjugal rights.section 32, indian divorce act states :'when either the husband or the wife has, without reasonable excuse withdrawn from the society of the other, either wife or ..... for petition for obtaining judicial separation. before 1955 the general hindu law did not recognize judicial separation among hindus. the 1955 act recognizes the right of judicial separation among hindus.before 1955 a hindu in general could not institute a suit in a munsifs ..... is allowed. proceedings in suit no. 306 of 1955 pending before the learned additional munsif, dehra dun are quashed. parties shall bear their own costs. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Reported in : (1959)IILLJ646P& H
..... 1955 to 13 july 1957. respondent 3 in his return accepts his employment in the amritsar branch of the petitioner but denies that he was initially employed at dehra dun and transferred from there. but that is not going to be a material matter in the consideration of this petition. on 14 july 1957, the petitioner transferred ..... industrial dispute to a labour court for adjudication if the dispute relates to any matter specified in the second schedule to the act, and in the second schedule entry 3 refers todischarge or dismissal of workmen including reinstatement or grant of relief to workmen wrongfully dismissed.the dispute here obviously ..... go into the second question. the appropriate government to make reference of an industrial dispute to a labour court according to section 2(a)(ii) of the act is the state government. that obviously is in relation to a dispute in an establishment within the territory of the state; the appropriate government can refer an .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Allahabad
Reported in : AIR1926All679
..... were acting merely as the plaintiffs' agents in despatching the sugar, or whether they should be regarded as sellers of the sugar to the ..... took the contrary view, finding that the defendants remained the owners of the sugar during its despatch by rail to dehra dun, and so they were liable for the loss in transit. the court held that they acted as principals in selling the sugar to the plaintiffs and they reserved the right of disposal of the consignment during the ..... transit, since it was consigned to their own agents and not to the plaintiffs at dehra dun. the first question to be considered is whether the defendants .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Allahabad
Reported in : AIR1953All580
..... between 1928 and 1930, he worked in several hospitals in bombay and acquired practical experience for a period of about three years. in 1931, he moved to dehra dun and built up a good reputation in that city. in 1938 he decided to leave for europe, having secured a scholarship for that purpose. he decided that ..... erase his name from the medical register.11. we are surprised that a responsible body created by the legislature for the maintenance of professional standards should have acted in this irresponsible manner without giving any adequate opportunity to dr. kesarbani to explain his case. without caring to ascertain in an unbiassed manner the case which ..... it will not be competent for the general council, without exercising their jurisdiction under section 13, (section 13 corresponds with sections 25 and 26 of the medical act), and simply because a licentiate of a local medical authority has been struck off the register of that authority, to erase his name from the dentists register..... .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Allahabad
Reported in : AIR1959All664
..... relationship of employer and employee had continued! to subsist between the parties,26. thus, for example, when subsequently the defendant wanted to join the research institute, dehra dun, for training, he considered it necessary to apply to the plaintiff company for permission. in reply the company did not state that no permission by it was ..... award, however, the defendant gave an application dated 3rd january, 1950, to the city magistrate, lucknow, who was the authority appointed under the payment of wages act (act iv of 1936) for the recovery of his wages from the plaintiff company for the period after the 19th october, 1948, and succeeded in obtaining a direction ..... that the evidence on record establishes beyond doubt that the defendant is not a workman. 'workman' is defined in section 2(s) of 'the industrial disputes act, 1947, (act' xiv of 1947);--'workman' means any person employed (including an apprentice) in any industry to do any skilled or unskilled manual or clerical work for hire .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Allahabad
Reported in : [1964]54ITR783(All)
..... of income-tax lucknow, wherein a note is added as follows :'(n.b.) the recovery of this very demand is also pressed by the d. m. dehra dun. since i reside in kanpur permanently i would request you to please send for the same here to be consolidated at one place for disposal.'therefore, it is ..... 1956, and therefore they were barred under the provisions of section 46, sub-clause (7), of the act. the petitioner, no doubt, had taken this stand before the income-tax officer, kanpuro, and the income-tax officer, dehra dun. to whom the proceedings were subsequently transpferred and also before the commissioner of income-tax lucknow, and the ..... collector, dehra dun the assessee, however, did not place all his cards on the table nor was the department vigilant enough .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Reported in : AIR1952P& H277
..... the principles and rules which apply in england would apply to this country because of the provisions of section 7 of the act. the argument further was that the respondent had at the time of his marriage in dehra dun on the 23rd october 1944 given his age 23, that he must therefore now be of the age of 30 and that ..... indulgence and never really wanted her to be married to him and that he practised a fraud upon her. the next day after the marriage the respondent remained at dehra dun while she left for meerut to join duty. after that both of them met during the christmas week of 1944 at delhi and stayed there for three days. she ..... present case. the petitioner was undoubtedly a minor as understood in the indian christian marriage act and her father being dead her mother's consent should have been obtained. this consent was never given and i doubt whether her marriage could have been validly solemnized in dehra dun, there being no consent of an undoubted guardian. this fact was known to the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Allahabad
Reported in : AIR1931All315
..... lal applies in revision against an order of mr. badhwar who on 2nd april 1929, declared kundan lal to be a tout. it appears that the bar association of dehra dun appointed an enquiry committee and eventually passed a resolution giving the names of seven persons who were asserted to be touts. we note from the resolution which was. eventually submitted ..... duly proved that that resolution' had been passed, any court could accept that finding as evidence of general repute, which is the phrase used in section 36 of the act of 1879. the practical result therefore is that nowadays whilst a court can still proceed under section 36 in the old way and call evidence it can also avoid the ..... we have no power to say that on a revisional application of this kind the order of mr. badhwar must be set aside. mr. ansari and mr. badhwar both acted and gave effect to the resolution and there was no evidence called in rebuttal by kundan lal which was believed by the lower court or by mr. badhwar as sweeping .....
Tag this Judgment!