Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: dehra dun act 1871 Sorted by: old Page 1 of about 280,202 results (0.417 seconds)

Homestead Company Vs. Valley Railroad

Court : US Supreme Court

..... been complied with. although the ratification of the adjustment and the grant to the valley railroad would seem to be inconsistent acts, yet congress, with full knowledge on the subject, on the 3d of march, 1871, confirmed the title to the state and its grantees. it is true the law by which this is done says it ..... effect of the proviso or reservation; and on the 31st of march, 1868, the state accordingly, by act of legislature, did ratify and confirm their action. congress equally, on the 3d of march, 1871, notwithstanding the decisions above mentioned, by act of the date just mentioned [ footnote 10 ] enacted: "that the title to the land certified to ..... the state of iowa by the commissioner of the general land office, under the act of july 12, 1862, in accordance with the adjustment made .....

Township of Elmwood Vs. Marcy

Court : US Supreme Court

..... accord with the decisions made in other states. mcmillan v. lee county, 3 ia. 317. it matters not, then, that the supreme court of illinois changed its ruling in 1871, as in the cases of marshall v. silliman, 61 ill. 218, and wiley v. silliman, 62 id. 170. page 92 u. s. 299 this was after the ..... affect the rights of third persons, are never regarded as objectionable, and certainly are within the competency of legislative authority." it is argued, however, that the validating act of april 17, 1869, is unconstitutional because it compels a municipal corporation to contract and pay a debt without its consent. it is said the election by which ..... officers could be recognized as the corporate authorities, the court observed "that they cannot be said to have voluntarily incurred this debt in behalf of the town. the act gave them no discretion. it declared the subscription shall be binding, and may be collected; and left to the town authorities only the ministerial function of executing the .....

County of Cass Vs. Shores

Court : US Supreme Court

..... thereof, attesting the same, and affixing hereto the seal of said court. done at the courthouse in the city of harrisonville in said county on the first day of october, 1871." "[seal]" "jehiel c. stevenson" " presiding justice of the county court of cass county, mo. " "c. h. dore," " clerk of the county court of cass county, mo. " "by s. j. ..... contended that they were only empowered to issue the bonds of the county in behalf of the township, and thus bind the township alone for payment under the township aid act, and on the other that they were authorized to charge the county with the indebtedness to be incurred. the latter, we think, is the true construction of the order. ..... of northrup & chick, in the city and state of new york, being the interest on funding bond no. 38." "c. h. dore, clerk " "by s. j. jones, d.c. " the act of the general assembly mentioned in the bond is in these words: "section 1. that the various counties of this state be, and they are hereby, authorized to fund any .....

Keval Kuber and anr. Vs. the Talukdari Settlement Officer and Gagubhai ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (1877)ILR1Bom586

..... , at all events since jiva's death, that possession must be regarded as adverse to the talukdar. his right to resume or to assess the land is, consequently, barred by act ix of 1871, section 29, and article 130, schedule ii.9. for these reasons we reverse the decree of the courts below, and allow the claim, with costs on defendants throughout.

Kherodemoney Dossee Vs. Doorgamoney Dossee and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : (1879)ILR4Cal456

..... property had become vested in the defendant 'as a trustee for a special purpose' within the meaning of section 10 of the limitation act of 1871, and consequently that this suit, which is brought to follow up such property in the defendant's hands, is not barred. ..... and valid gift.13. with regard to the question, whether the plaintiff's suit is barred by limitation, that depends upon act ix of 1871, which contains the law applicable to this case. it seems to me that the best way of considering this case is ..... to see what articles of the schedule to that act would provide for this case, if it were an ordinary case; and ..... not have been vested in the defendant doorgamoney within the meaning of the word 'vested' as used in section 10 of the act.23. but the question still remains whether, under the circumstances which the plaintiff sets forth, the property was held by the defendant .....

County of Cass Vs. Gillett

Court : US Supreme Court

..... reads as follows: "the 8th, 9th, 10th, 11th, 12th, 13th, 14th, 15th, 16th, 17th, 18th, 19th, 20th, 21st, and 22d sections of an act entitled 'an act to incorporate the osage valley and southern kansas railroad company, approved nov. 21, 1857,' are hereby reenacted and declared to be applicable to the company hereby incorporated, and all ..... the county court of cass county, missouri " " $50] harrisonville, cass county, missouri, feb. 1, 1871 [$50" "the county of cass acknowledges itself to owe and promises to pay to the bearer fifty dollars, on the first day of august, 1873, at the national park bank ..... under the order thereof, attesting the same and affixing the seal of said court, at the town of harrisonville, county of cass, aforesaid, this first day of february, a.d. 1871." "jehiel c. stevenson" " presiding justice of the county court of cass county, missouri " "attest:" "[seal of cass county court]" "c. h. dore" " clerk of .....

Hatch Vs. Dana

Court : US Supreme Court

..... more than thirty percent of the subscriptions. 2. pollard v. bailey, 20 wall. 520, and terry v. tubman, 92 u. s. 166 , distinguished from the present case. on april 12, 1871, charles a. dana recovered a judgment in the circuit court of the united states for the northern district of illinois against the chicago republican company, a corporation organized and existing ..... of $6,419.17 and costs. an execution issued upon this judgment was by the marshal of the united states for that district returned nulla bona. thereupon, on aug. 23, 1871, dana, on behalf of himself and all other creditors of the company who might come in and seek relief by and contribute to the expense of the suit, exhibited in .....

Bajendro Lall Gossami Vs. Shama Churn Lahori and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : (1880)ILR5Cal188

..... , upon the ground that the subordinate judge had no jurisdiction to try the suit. that appears to be undoubtedly a mistake, because by section 19 of act vi of 1871, the jurisdiction of a subordinate judge extends, subject to the provisions in section 6 of the code of civil procedure, to all original suits cognizable by ..... land, every particle of which belonged to all its owners'. in that way the subordinate judge clearly expressed his opinion that the erection of the nowbutkhana was an act of exclusive possession which the defendants were not justified in committing.12. the judgment under appeal contains several other inaccuracies, one of which is this. the learned ..... found (and its judgment was then in full effect and vigor) that 'the excavation of the land and the erection of the nowbutkhana by the defendants were acts of exclusive possession which the joint magistrate confirmed. i am bound to say that the defendants were not justified in taking exclusive possession of a specific share .....

Bridge Company Vs. United States

Court : US Supreme Court

..... such by the resolution of 1869 -- it cannot be presumed that this reserved power was to be exercised in any other than the constitutional mode. hence, when the act of 1871 required the bridge to be taken down and constructed on a different plan, if constructed at all, we should expect what we find was done, that provision would be ..... states to pay the bridge company the cost of the change that was directed in the plan of its bridge. it cannot be denied that, but for the act of 1871, a bridge built according to the original plan would have been a lawful structure which the company could have maintained until congress withdrew its assent or required alterations to ..... said bridge. it is not necessary to inquire whether congress could do both these things or not, for it did not, as i understand the language of the act of march 3, 1871, c. 121, withdraw or intend to withdraw its assent previously given. it did exercise the alternative power given by the joint resolution, and "direct the necessary .....

Vijaya Ragava Vs. the Secretary of State for India in Council

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1883)ILR7Mad466

..... , j.42. on the 8th february 1882 the plaintiff in this case was elected to be a municipal commissioner of salem under section 9 of the towns' improvement act (madras act iii), 1871, and under the provisions of that section he was entitled to continue in office for three years. the section, however, goes on to provide that 'the governor ..... plaintiff was elected by the rate-payers of salem one of the municipal commissioners of that town, under the provisions of section 9 of the towns' improvement act (madras act iii of 1871).2. notification of his election was published in the gazette of the 23rd of february 1882 and he entered on the duties of his office.3. in ..... there was admittedly no misconduct or neglect by the plaintiff.18. i am unable to see that the argument of the advocate-general is consistent with section 9 of act iii of 1871. if the general discretion contended for was intended by the legislature, the words 'for misconduct or neglect of duty' may be omitted as useless, inasmuch as .....