Contracting - Judgment Search Results

The Coffee Board Vs. Commissioner of Commercial Taxes and ors.

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: ILR1986KAR1365; 1985(2)KarLJ397; [1985]60STC142(Kar)

..... cases referring to benjamin cheshire and fifoot s law of contracts friedman s law in a changing society the constitution of ..... board s case 1970 3scr147 inasmuch as the penultimate sales two contracts for sale of mineral ore entered into by mohd serajuddin ..... enable the latter to export those goods in compliance with existing contracts or orders are regarded as inextricably connected with the export .....

Metropolitan Life Vs. Massachusetts

Court: US Supreme Court

..... for purposes of any law of any state purporting to regulate insurance companies insurance contracts banks trust companies or investment companies massachusetts argues that its mandated benefit law as ..... were to accept appellants argument that state laws mandating contract terms on collectively bargained contracts are preempted unless congress authorizes their imposition we would still find 47b not .....

Universal Plast Limited Vs. Santosh Kumar Gupta

Court: Delhi

Reported in: AIR1985Delhi383; 1986(1)ARBLR282(Delhi)

..... the suit was questioned was that all these three contracts were onward contracts and were void and unenforceable because they were made ..... was prohibited by law namely the statutes forbidding forward contracts these contracts were also not shown to be covered by the ..... was another order called the vegetable oils and oilcakes forward contracts prohibition order 1119 there was some controversy as to which .....

Mitsubishi Vs. Soler Chrysler-plymouth

Court: US Supreme Court

..... convention was to encourage the recognition and enforcement of commercial arbitration agreements in international contracts and to unify the standards by which agreements to arbitrate are observed and ..... which provide for the enforcement of international arbitration awards article iii provides that each contracting state shall recognize arbitral awards as binding and enforce them however if an .....

Nrpc Vs. Atchison, T. and S. F. Ry. Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... provide passenger service while there can be no doubt that the basic agreements are contracts they are contracts not between the railroads and the united states but simply between the railroads ..... congress could make that delegation the district court asserted that the agreements might constitute contracts between the united states and the railroads because they granted the railroads relief from .....

Sarju International, Bombay Vs. Union of India

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 1989(39)ELT542(Bom)

..... export assistance scheme the petitioners entered into inter alia nine contracts all dated 21st august 1978 with foreign buyers for export ..... 78345 78241 78239 78173 78233 78240 and 78242 pursuant to these contracts the goods were exported in the months of january and ..... so effected by them under the scheme in these circumstances for contracts which were concluded prior to the withdrawal of the scheme .....

East Indian Produce Ltd. Vs. Naresh Acharya Bhaduri and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: [1988]64CompCas259(Cal)

..... sen have submitted that the said agreement is hit by various provisions of the securities contracts regulation act 1956 hereinafter referred to as the securities act 62 in this connection our ..... that the said agreement contravenes the provisions of the companies act 1956 and the securities contracts regulation act 1956 no order should be made in this application this application is therefore .....

United States Vs. Bagley

Court: US Supreme Court

..... to the freedom of information act and the privacy act respondent received copies of atf contracts signed by the principal government witnesses during the undercover investigation and stating that the government ..... denied the motion finding beyond a reasonable doubt that had the existence of the atf contracts been disclosed to it during trial the disclosure would not have affected the outcome because .....

North Side Lumber Co. Vs. Block

Court: US Supreme Court

..... this is a suit brought in federal district court by various lumber companies who had contracted to purchase timber from the united states the plaintiffs petitioners here seek both a ..... united states is void is problematic from another standpoint as well had petitioners breached their contracts rather than first seeking a declaratory judgment the district court would have had jurisdiction under .....

Vinayakappa Suryabhanappa Dahenkar Vs. Dulichand Hariram Murarka

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: AIR1986Bom193; 1987MhLJ274

..... the 19th century abandoned the practice of applying the public policy against unconscionable bargains to contracts generally as they had formerly done to any contract considered to be usurious but ..... 1963 the courts have often avoided the enforcement of unconscionable provisions in long printed standardized contracts in part by the process of interpretation against the parties using them and in part .....