Contracting - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: contracting Year: 1928 Page 1 of about 169 results (0.015 seconds)Ayyaswami Iyer Vs. Mahadeva Iyer and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Dec-20-1928
Reported in: 119Ind.Cas.57
william watkins phillips j 1 the appellant is the 1st defendant in a suit brought by the plaintiffs as reversionary...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTH. Vs. H.
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Feb-01-1928
Reported in: AIR1928Bom279; (1928)30BOMLR523; 110Ind.Cas.266
amberson marten kt c j 1 this case is another illustration of the difficulties confronted by those who have to...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAyyaswami Aiyar Vs. Mahadeva Aiyar and Two ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Dec-20-1928
Reported in: AIR1929Mad421; (1929)56MLJ441
phillips j 1 the appellant is the 1st defendant in a suit brought by the plaintiffs as reversionary heirs of...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBomanji Ardeshir Wadia Vs. the Secretary of State for India
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Nov-28-1928
Reported in: (1929)31BOMLR256
..... assessment bombay land revenue code bom act v of 1879 rules for construction of formal contracts and conveyances a deed of grant cannot be legitimately construed in the light of previous .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTLiberty Warehouse Co. Vs. Burley Growers' Cooperative
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Feb-20-1928
..... may contract only with them for marketing such products it declares that these contracts shall not be illegal prescribes penalties for interfering therewith and further provides that ..... cooperative marketing statutes promote the common interest the provisions for protecting the fundamental contracts against interference by outsiders are essential to the plan this court has recognized as .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCherukuri Venkataratnam Vs. Bolla Guravayya and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Nov-13-1928
Reported in: 121Ind.Cas.18
..... justice points out that the transfer of property act recognises unregistered contracts for the sale of land but that they create no ..... a trustee of his promise where then a vendor who has contracted to sell immoveable property and has under the contract put ..... excluding evidence where it was doubtful to which of the alleged contracts possession should be referred and upon the same considerations i .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT(Cherukuri) Venkataratnam Vs. Bola Guravayya and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Nov-13-1928
Reported in: AIR1930Mad84
..... justice points out that the transfer of property act recognises unregistered contracts for the sale of land but that they create no ..... a trustee of his promisee where then a vendor who has contracted to sell immovable property and has under the contract put ..... excluding evidence where it was doubtful to which of two alleged contracts possession should be referred and upon the same considerations i .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBlack and White Cab Vs. Black and Yellow Cab
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Apr-09-1928
..... 465 that public policy requires that competent persons shall have the utmost liberty of contracting and that their contracts when entered into fairly and voluntarily shall be held sacred and shall be ..... cases petitioner argues that the kentucky decisions are persuasive and establish the invalidity of such contracts and that the circuit court of appeals erred in refusing to follow them but as .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKala Chand Mukherjee and anr. Vs. Jatindra Mohan Banerjee and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jul-04-1928
Reported in: AIR1929Cal263,117Ind.Cas.855
..... be some limit of time boyond which the performance of contracts for the transfer of property by way of sale pre ..... the offending covenant is sought to be enforced as between the contracting parties themselves amongst such instances may be cited nobin chandra ..... whether an agreement of this nature is enforceable as between the contracting parties giving the matter all the considerations that i possibly .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJackson Vs. S.S. archimedes
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jan-03-1928
..... the present purpose that congress might have legislated to annual such contracts as a condition upon which foreign vessels might enter the ports ..... in 11 to interfere with wages advanced in foreign ports under contracts legal where made that section dealt with advancements and contained no ..... provision such as we find in 4 under section 4 all contracts are avoided which run counter to the purposes of the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial