Skip to content


Contracting - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: contracting Year: 1981 Page 1 of about 300 results (0.011 seconds)
Apr 06 1981 (FN)

Universities Research Assn., Inc. Vs. Coutu

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Apr-06-1981

..... been no davis bacon act determination would introduce substantial uncertainty into government contracting and would undercut the elaborate administrative scheme promulgated to assure consistency in ..... finally post contract challenges would disrupt timely and efficient performance of government contracts and might well provoke jurisdictional disputes between construction unions and unions representing .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 22 1981 (FN)

Plumbers and Pipefitters Vs. Plumbers and Pipefitters

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jun-22-1981

..... act 1947 that section establishes such jurisdiction for s uits for violation of contracts between any labor organizations representing employees in a covered industry a union constitution ..... further stability among labor organizations therefore 301 a provided federal jurisdiction for enforcement of contracts made by labor organizations to counteract jurisdictional defects in many state courts that .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 02 1981 (FN)

Arkansas Louisiana Gas Co. Vs. Hall

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jul-02-1981

..... and the classifications practices and regulations affecting such rates and charges together with all contracts which in any manner affect or relate to such rates charges classifications and ..... 2 34 after explaining its reasons for prohibiting indefinite escalation clauses in newly executed contracts the commission stated however we are convinced that we cannot declare the escalation provisions .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 13 1981 (FN)

Allstate Ins. Co. Vs. Hague

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jan-13-1981

..... to violate due process because that decision frustrates the reasonable expectations of the contracting parties contracting parties can of course make their expectations explicit by providing in their contract ..... decision to apply this rule violate due process because that decision frustrated the contracting parties reasonable expectations the decision was consistent with due process because it did .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 19 1981 (HC)

Union of India (Uoi) and anr. Vs. Chinoy Chablani and Co.

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Feb-19-1981

Reported in: AIR1982Cal365

..... the principal alone who under such circumstances becomes the main contracting party and as such becomes liable in case of breach ..... the performance of the contract by the other contracting party and the other contracting party also has the same rights as against ..... the principal discloses himself before the contract is completed the other contracting party has also the right to refuse to fulfil the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 30 1981 (HC)

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Hewitt Robins

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Nov-30-1981

Reported in: [1983]141ITR278(Cal)

..... payments was not a condition of the assessee carrying on its business of execution of contracts in support of the above submissions certain authorities were cited before the tribunal the tribunal ..... of the assessee commenced long before these payments were made in respect of these particular contracts the tribunal therefore found that the payments in question were not made for the initiation .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 31 1981 (HC)

Barun K. Sinha and anr. Vs. District Magistrate, Murshidabad and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Aug-31-1981

Reported in: AIR1982Cal19

..... and acceptance of lowest rates will not be obligatory to the contracting officer this tender notice has been annexed as annexure b to ..... and acceptance of lowest rates will not be obligatory to the contracting officer the chairman of the district diet committee or for that ..... cannanore the co operative milk supplies union was to be given contracts on the basis of price fixed by the revenue department it .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 02 1981 (FN)

Commonwealth Edison Co. Vs. Montana

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jul-02-1981

..... discriminates against interstate commerce because 90 of montana coal is shipped to other states under contracts that shift the tax burden primarily to non montana utility companies and thus to citizens ..... 30 u s c 191 footnote 20 indeed appellants alleged in their complaints that the contracts between appellant coal producers and appellant utility companies require the utility companies to reimburse .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 10 1981 (HC)

B.S. Aujla Company Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Kaluram Mahadeo Prosad and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Sep-10-1981

Reported in: AIR1983Cal106

..... said documents tendered were not in accordance with the said two contracts and or letters of credit entered into by and between ..... merchants and they had extensive dealings with the buyer the plaintiffs contracted with the egyptian buyers for the sale of a certain ..... for the fulfilment by the plaintiffs of their obligations under the contracts these were to be established with two egyptian banks that .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 03 1981 (HC)

Nanalal Madhavji Varma Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Aug-03-1981

Reported in: AIR1982Cal167

..... had not been complied with which provides that 299 contracts 1 all contracts made in the exercise of the executive power of ..... engineer have been given with the powers of entering into contracts the chief engineer has been given unlimited power chief operation ..... include the authority to enter into any addendums or supplementary contracts there in that particular case the person had the authority .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //