Contracting - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: contracting Year: 1948 Page 1 of about 115 results (0.012 seconds)The High Commissioner for India and Another Vs. I.M. Lall
Court: Privy Council
Decided on: Mar-18-1948
therefore any right of action must either be based on contract or conferred by statute it is sufficient to refer to
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe High Commissioner for India and the High Commissioner for Pakistan ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Mar-18-1948
Reported in: (1948)50BOMLR649
qualification must be read as an implied condition into every contract between the crown and a public servant with the effect
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThikka Surya Rao and ors. Vs. Sirangu Sathiraju and anr.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-04-1948
Reported in: AIR1948Mad510; (1948)1MLJ396
ordergovinda menon j 1 in proceedings under section 145 criminal procedure code in m c no 11 of 1946 on...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMt. Nawab Jan and ors. Vs. the Notified Area Committee
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Feb-17-1948
Reported in: AIR1948All273
sapru j 1 the suit out of which this appeal arises was brought by one mt mahtab jan who died...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTLichter Vs. United States
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-14-1948
..... declaration of war december 8 1941 congress limited the renegotiation act to future contracts and to contracts already existing but pursuant to which final payments had not been made prior ..... adjusting net compensation for war services through the compulsory renegotiation of profits under existing contracts between private parties including recourse to unilateral orders for payments into the treasury .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner Vs. Sunnen
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Apr-05-1948
..... others within their family groups although none specifically related to the assignment of patent license contracts between members of the same family it must therefore be determined whether this clifford ..... the conclusion is unavoidable that the taxpayer retained a substantial interest in the license contracts which he assigned 2 the taxpayer s controlling position in the corporation also permitted .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTUnited States Vs. Line Material Co.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Mar-08-1948
..... violations of that act by an allegedly unlawful combination or conspiracy between appellees through contracts to restrain interstate trade in certain patented electrical devices the restraint alleged arose from ..... oil cracking patents and divided among themselves royalties from licensees fixed by the pooling contracts was upheld the theory was reiterated that a price limitation for the product was .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJoseph KleIn and Others Vs. Eliahu (Leo) Heiman and Others
Court: Privy Council
Decided on: Mar-08-1948
Reported in: AIR1949PC53
..... that judgment be given against plaintiffs a declaring that the contracts made between the parties are cancelled b ordering payment of ..... for them to consider whether as the appellants contended the contracts had been rescinded by the notice already mentioned but they ..... the counterclaim and upon it made a declaration that the contracts between the parties had been rescinded 7 the respondents did .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBay Ridge Operating Co., Inc. Vs. Aaron
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-07-1948
..... administered through collective bargaining is more persuasive in defining regular rate than individual contracts although our public policy recognizes the effectiveness of collective bargaining and encourages ..... had been interpreted judicially in disregard of long established customs practices and contracts between employers and employees congress had to undo such judicial misconstruction because .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMandeville Island Farms Vs. American Crystal Sugar
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: May-10-1948
..... price fixing arrangement were simple the refiners adopted identical form contracts and began to compute beet prices on the basis ..... of either signing or abandoning sugar beet farming petitioners accordingly contracted with respondent under this plan during the 1939 1940 and ..... not matter contrary to respondent s view that the growers contracting with the other two refiners may have been benefited rather .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial