Skip to content


Contracting - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: contracting Year: 1922 Page 1 of about 155 results (0.012 seconds)
Jan 31 1922 (PC)

T.B. Ramchandra Rao Vs. A.N.S. Ramchandra Rao

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Jan-31-1922

Reported in: (1922)24BOMLR963

buckmaster j 1 on august 6 1858 ramajee bavajee pandit who died on august 10 1858 executed a deed of...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 09 1922 (FN)

Davis Vs. Wallace

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jan-09-1922

davis v wallace 257 u s 478 1922 u s supreme court davis v wallace 257 u s 478 1922...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 17 1922 (PC)

Sanyasi Charan Mandal Vs. Krishnadhan Banerji

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Jan-17-1922

Reported in: (1922)24BOMLR700

..... ading family dayabhaga school new business started by karta insolvency adjudication of adult members debt contracted for purposes of the new business liability of minor s share indian contract act ix ..... dayabhaga school of hindu law the share of a minor is not liable for debts contracted for the purposes of a new business started by the karta or manager of the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 15 1922 (FN)

Hill Vs. Wallace

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: May-15-1922

..... not commerce with foreign governments or among several states but is commerce wholly between persons contracting within the state of illinois respecting the purchase or sale of grain which forms a ..... the maintenance of grain exchanges within its borders upon which is conducted the making of contracts which are merely intrastate transactions the bill avers the complainants are not in collusion with .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 04 1922 (FN)

United States Vs. Mason and Hanger Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Dec-04-1922

..... and expenses not compensated by insurance or otherwise as are found and certified by the contracting officer to have been actually sustained including settlements made with the written consent and ..... approval of the contracting officer by the contractor in connection with said work and to have clearly resulted .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 25 1922 (PC)

Jitmull-girdhari Lal Vs. Ram Gopal Bohitram

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Apr-25-1922

Reported in: AIR1923Cal419,74Ind.Cas.275

..... brokers are liable upon and entitled to enforce all principal contracts as against both buyers and sellers even if the principals ..... hesitation in coming to the conclusion that principal contracts as distinguished from direct contracts are a very well known feature in this ..... is established by the evidence of two witnesses that principal contracts sometime come into existence not because it is desired by .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 19 1922 (PC)

V.S.V. Subbaraya Mudali Vs. Thangavelu Mudali and ors.

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Sep-19-1922

Reported in: (1923)45MLJ44

..... a separate trade in another shop under a different vilasam he contracted debts and purchased some properties and the plaintiff is not liable ..... decree which declares that his share is liable for the debts contracted by the 2nd defendant and the alienations are binding upon ..... family his share in the family property is liable for debts contracted by his managing coparcener for any family purpose or any .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 03 1922 (PC)

Mangobinda Dutta and anr. Vs. J. Baisogomaff

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Mar-03-1922

Reported in: AIR1922Cal104,67Ind.Cas.714

..... of steam coal and rubble from the respondent under three several contracts dated the 20th december 1916 25th december 1916 and 2ad ..... paying cash for the earlier orders to be given under the contracts and the deposits being eventually credited as payments or part ..... contract that they failed to place orders under the other two contracts secondly that the supply of waggons was stopped by government .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 21 1922 (PC)

Bappu Alias Venkataramier and anr. Vs. V.A. Annamalai Chettiar and anr ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Dec-21-1922

Reported in: AIR1923Mad313; (1923)44MLJ226

..... necessity in which cases the co parcener would probably come under clause c because the contracting party has a right to displace his title in cases of benefit or necessity 3 .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 17 1922 (FN)

United Shoe Machinery Corp. Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Apr-17-1922

..... necessary parties because their rights were necessarily adjudicated in enjoining the enforcements of the contracts involved but we agree with the district court that the lessees were not indispensable ..... monopolization or attempts to monopolize interstate trade were condemned the clayton act 3 prohibits contracts of sale or leases made upon the condition agreement or understanding that the purchaser .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //