Constitution Of India Article 368 Power Of Parliament To Amend The Constitution And Procedure Therefor - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: constitution of india article 368 power of parliament to amend the constitution and procedure therefor Court: chennai Year: 1986 Page 1 of about 215 results (1.191 seconds)D. Jayaraman Vs. Govt. of Tamil Nadu and anr.
Court : Chennai
Decided on : Jul-21-1986
Reported in : AIR1987Mad215
..... 368 is that if parliament proposes to amend any provision of the constitution not enshrined in the proviso the procedure prescribed by the main part of the article ..... of the resolution and therefore the resolution is unsustainable as it suffers from arbitrary exercise of power and is in violation ..... with the requirement of art 169 1 of the constitution of india i am also unable to accept the construction .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMarie Lazarine Gacillia Rasson Represented by Her Power Agent and Husb ...
Court : Chennai
Decided on : Dec-03-1986
Reported in : (1990)1MLJ153
115 code of civil procedure and this court exercises the power only as high court and not as persona designata and 25 2 of the pondicherry buildings lease and rent control amendment act 1980 reads as follows every application to the high high court and not as persona designata and that the procedure followed is as per order 4 rule 21 of the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJega Veerapandian Vs. B.U. Shanmugham and ors.
Court : Chennai
Decided on : Apr-02-1986
Reported in : AIR1987Mad86; (1987)IMLJ116
appeared for the returning officer as well as the election authority namely respondent 2 this seems to have been done in related to the scrutiny of nominations the government has now amended rules 14 and 15 by addition of sub rule 4 rule 15 in our view now adequately provides for a procedure for giving effect to the intention behind the first two these nomination papers even at the stage of scrutiny and therefore much less before the scrutiny itself this however will not
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAbdul Azeez Vs. Food Inspector
Court : Chennai
Decided on : Jul-24-1986
Reported in : 1988CriLJ1171
apply to the court concerned to get another sample of article of food kept by the local health authority analysed by the act as pointed out earlier since the local health authority will know only the time of the filing of the right of appeal under section 417 3 of the old code as per which the appeal is limited only to cases involvement in the adulteration of the food article and that therefore a lenient view may be taken in the matter though
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Income-tax Vs. Kothari Textiles Ltd.
Court : Chennai
Decided on : Aug-11-1986
Reported in : [1988]172ITR448(Mad)
room lines in the assessee s textile mills and that therefore it is an expenditure incurred towards current repairs the income
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCity Transports Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax
Court : Chennai
Decided on : Jun-19-1986
Reported in : [1986]162ITR436(Mad)
in coimbatore district with permits granted by the road transport authority during the previous year relevant to the assessment year 1973 any right to use the vehicle without such permission the procedure for transferring a permit is governed by the rules framed collect all the monies from a reading of the agreement therefore it may be seen that the consideration paid was not
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSha Dhanraj Chunilal Vs. C. Vedachalam Chettiar
Court : Chennai
Decided on : Feb-14-1986
Reported in : (1987)1MLJ385
filed h r a no 565 of 1978 the appellate authority fixed the fair rent at rs 600 per month by of fair rent by the appellate authority was after the amendment act of 1973 which had come into force in such the rules framed under the act which sets out the procedure to be followed in the disposal of applications filed under of the landlord on its merits as well he has therefore allowed the appeal and remitted the petition for a full
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTState Vs. S. Seshamal Pandia and ors.
Court : Chennai
Decided on : Mar-14-1986
Reported in : [1986]60CompCas889(Mad)
that subsequently a report was sent to the government of india under section 209a 6 of the companies act and that the mistakes is the criterion the assistant registrar has no power to extend the time under the section therefore if the contend that the offence is a continuing one before me therefore when the offence is not a continuing one it has
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNational Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. V. Vasantha and ors.
Court : Chennai
Decided on : Sep-26-1986
Reported in : I(1988)ACC249
to strengthen this line of submission he relies upon united india insurance co ltd v nagammal 1983 a cj 541 wherein of 1978 decided on 29 10 1980 had considered the scope of section 93 and the various decisions rendered about the 5 herein by invoking order 41 rule 33 of civil procedure code in madras motor genl ins co v katanreddi subbareddy fell down from the pillion seat and sustained injuries and therefore they are not liable to pay compensation and that there
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTG. Shenbagammal Vs. Controller of Estate Duty
Court : Chennai
Decided on : Jun-23-1986
Reported in : (1986)55CTR(Mad)368; [1986]162ITR445(Mad)
the estate duty act 1953 would not fall within the scope of the expression debtor encumbrance occurring in that section estate charge over any property of the husband and it cannot therefore be said that what passed on the death of the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT