Constitution Of India Article 368 Power Of Parliament To Amend The Constitution And Procedure Therefor - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: constitution of india article 368 power of parliament to amend the constitution and procedure therefor Court: allahabad Year: 1997 Page 1 of about 300 results (1.04 seconds)Anirudh Shahi Vs. Executive Engineer, Construction Division, Pwd Banda ...
Court : Allahabad
Decided on : Mar-04-1997
Reported in : AIR1997All363
petition allowed civil doctrine of non traverse article 226 of constitution of india in writ petition prayer to quash the recovery civil doctrine of non traverse article 226 of constitution of india in writ petition prayer to quash the recovery counter affidavit up action 7 petition allowed civil doctrine of non traverse article 226 of constitution of india in writ petition prayer to its communication to and follow up action 7 petition allowed civil doctrine of non traverse article 226 of constitution of india
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKisan Sahkari Chini Mills Ltd., Ghosi, Mau Vs. State of U.P. and Other ...
Court : Allahabad
Decided on : Sep-05-1997
Reported in : 1998(1)AWC348; 1999(105)ELT36(All)
i and entries 8 and 51 of list ii of constitution of india and paragraph 709 of u p excise manual india except a alcoholic liquors for human consumption b opium indian hemp and other narcotic drugs and narcotics butincluding medicinal and fit for human consumption the central government would have exclusive jurisdiction to control and manage the same they are entitled to connection i refer to the decision of this court in civil misc writ petition no 146 of 1990 m s pilkhani
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTArun Lata Vs. Civil Judge and ors.
Court : Allahabad
Decided on : May-23-1997
Reported in : AIR1998All29; II(1997)DMC383
of the case the application under article 226 of the constitution of india is not maintainable against the orders impugned 16 added as under articles 226 227 of the constitution of india be added 2 that in the grounds after ground no in which the decision was made the jurisdiction exercised under article 227 is also a revisional jurisdiction in exercise of article revised makes the distinction or difference as to which revisional power would be exercised by the high court 226 or 227 i it mentions executive and in chapter ii it mentions parliament while judiciary has been dealt with in chapter iv similarly writ petition in that event it cannot assume jurisdiction to amend the said writ petition in respect of which the court high court notwithstanding anything contained in the code of civil procedure or in any other law the jurisdiction exercised by the a healthy and peaceful society vis a vis the family therefore orders in this respect are to be passed with due
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDr. Shivani Agarwal Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and ors.
Court : Allahabad
Decided on : Mar-27-1997
Reported in : AIR1998All16
of the articles 14 16 19 and 21 of the constitution of india has also been made inasmuch as the same and editors of dainik jagran amar ujala poineer times of india etc with request to publish the said notice but free would be unreasonable and unjust and will be hit by article 14 of the constitution of india in my opinion the in the said examination and was placed at serial no 368 in the merit list and after adjusting the reserved category appearance he she can send his her representative with an authority letter for allotment the allotment madeto the authorised representative shall educational service commission removal of difficulties order 1981 which provides procedure for ad hoc appointment ofteachers and requires that on receipt was prior to a date when he got actual admission therefore if he had appeared on being so eligible to appear
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPosysha Industries Co. Ltd. Vs. Collector and ors.
Court : Allahabad
Decided on : Oct-13-1997
Reported in : (1998)1UPLBEC391
connection reference was also made to article 23 of the constitution of india in support of the claim of the workmen was also made to article 23 of the constitution of india in support of the claim of the workmen for payment act 1956 or any other law or the memorandum and articles of association of the industrial company or any other instrument relating thereto pending before any court tribunal officer or other authority shall remain stayed or be continued subject to such declaration loss and such an intention can not be imputed to parliament 18 in the present case the recovery related to claim petition and in the affidavits filed in support of the amendment application have been referred to for contending that the auction 1996 1 sc 298 as also some provisions of civil procedure code in support of his contention 14 learned standing counsel could move the writ petition on the very next date therefore such notices are sufficient notices and the petitioner has failed
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM/S. Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. Vs. M/S. Kailash Motors
Court : Allahabad
Decided on : Jan-03-1997
Reported in : AIR1997All314
writ petition which he filed under art 226 of the constitution this court accepted the contention of the landlord after placing not maintainable 35 in d c bhatia v union of india 1995 1 scc 104 the apex court of the land of the rent act including from the bar against the power of courts to entertain a suit for the eviction of to as the esso acquisition act was enacted by the parliament for the purposes of acquiring rights and interest of the contended that the provisions of the rent act despite its amendment with effect from 18 5 1983 would have no application applicant that since the provisions of s 20 1 are procedural in nature it will have retrospective application to the pending no 17 of 1985 w e f 18 5 1983 therefore the suit in question having been filed prior to that
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTChakkhari Lal and ors. Vs. State of U.P. and ors.
Court : Allahabad
Decided on : Oct-01-1997
Reported in : (1998)1UPLBEC417
its orders it being vested by article 215 of the constitution may compel the person bound by the order to comply the all authorities civil or judicial in the territory of india shall act in aid of the supreme court in the the code which in its explanation excludes the proceedings under article 226 of the constitution read with explanation to section 141 contained in the code however the high court is not powerless to see implementation of its orders it being vested by manner prescribed by or under any law made by the parliament and until such law is not made by the order in writ jurisdiction are not capable of execution through the procedure contained in the code however the high court is not been implemented in letters and spirit the writ petition is therefore wholly misconceived and not maintainable 9 mr sudhir agrawal on
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRamashraya and Etc. Etc. Vs. District Panchayat Raj Officer and anr.
Court : Allahabad
Decided on : Sep-01-1997
Reported in : AIR1998All87; (1997)3UPLBEC1872
to exercise its discretionary powers under article 226 of the constitution if it considers that in view of the fact and case to interfere under article 226 of the constitution of india 53 in the aforesaid case the petitioner had challenged the this court can decline to exercise its discretionary powers under article 226 of the constitution if it considers that in view ambit of constitutionally permissible limits falls in thedomain of legislative power 5 in para 4 it was further observed a president the panchayat and was removable only by the electorate hence amended provisions are repugnant to the concept of democracy and amounts but how it should be initiated what should be the procedure who should exercise it within ambit of constitutionally permissible limits prescribed authority by order dated 17 18 9 l986 itcannot therefore be said that the motion was not taken up for
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTLalji Yadav and ors. Vs. State of U.P. and anr.
Court : Allahabad
Decided on : Nov-20-1997
Reported in : 1998CriLJ2366
p c or under article 226 and 227 of the constitution as the case may be and allow the law to law reported in denesh trivedi m p v union of india 1997 3scr93 in which it has been held that the inherent power under section 482 cr p c or under article 226 and 227 of the constitution as the case may an exhaustive list of various kinds of cases wherein such power should be exercised 21 in the matter of state of the c b i9 although the prayer for allowing the amendment in the main petition has been made but the court police had a statutory right under the code of criminal procedure to investigate into the offence and the high court should of the applicants is required to be determined the amounts therefore which were required to be paid to the deceased by
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSylvania and Luxman Ltd. Vs. Raminder Singh and Another
Court : Allahabad
Decided on : Sep-29-1997
Reported in : 1998(1)AWC454
5 of 1995 are violative of article 14 of the constitution of india 7 the second contention cannot be accepted because 1995 are violative of article 14 of the constitution of india 7 the second contention cannot be accepted because in a u p act no 5 of 1995 are violative of article 14 of the constitution of india 7 the second contention r o 259 reads as under in exercise of the powers conferred by section 3 of the cantonment s extension of permitted to be raised only when the written statement is amended issue is framed and parties are given opportunity of hearing
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT