Commitment - Judgment Search Results

Cantonment Board, Delhi Vs. Mangey Ram

Court: Delhi

Reported in: AIR1987Delhi77; 1986(11)DRJ97

s s chadha j 1 the question of law raised in this second appeal is whether the cantonment board delhi...

Gokaldas Harbhagawandas Vs. Collector of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in: (1987)(10)LC17Tri(Mum.)bai

..... other than an irrevocable letter of credit why then firm commitments by way of irrevocable letters of credit obviously because for the ..... purposes of the saving in the public notice no commitment other than that of a bank irrevocably securing the payment of ..... price by means of an irrevocable letter of credit a commitment that constitutes a definite undertaking by the issuing bank provided the .....

Allen Vs. Illinois

Court: US Supreme Court

..... illinois general assembly has squarely rejected this argument in other civil commitment proceedings illinois civil commitment procedure expressly protects the individual s right to silence footnote 2 ..... whether the privilege against self incrimination applies addington demonstrates that involuntary commitment does not itself trigger the entire range of criminal procedural protections indeed .....

Nix Vs. Whiteside

Court: US Supreme Court

..... impeach that testimony and would seek to withdraw from representation if respondent insisted on committing perjury respondent ultimately testified as originally contemplated admitting on cross examination that he had ..... face of these dangers an attorney could reasonably conclude that dissuading his client from committing perjury was in the client s best interest and comported with standards of .....

Bowers Vs. Hardwick

Court: US Supreme Court

..... the eleventh circuit syllabus after being charged with violating the georgia statute criminalizing sodomy by committing that act with another adult male in the bedroom of his home respondent hardwick respondent ..... others with burying alive 4 w blackstone commentaries 215 discussing the infamous crime against nature committed either with man or beast a crime which ought to be strictly and impartially .....

State of Gujarat Vs. Mangal Traders

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: AIR1987Guj234; (1987)1GLR514

..... need not be absolutely certain that the breach of the control order is committed being committed or likely to be committed the test is whether a prudent man in the circumstances would be ..... three articles namely groundnut groundnut oil and groundnut shelled and unshelled any contravention has been committed and once he has reason to believe that in respect of these articles contravention has .....

Kishore Amrutlal Patel Vs. Rajiv Takru and ors.

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: 1988CriLJ826; (1987)2GLR1031

..... concerned the material before the detaining authority must show that the detenu was committing or instigating to commit any offence punishable under the essential commodities act 1955 or in the alternative ..... indicated by form b it cannot be said that if manufacturer of essential commodity commits adulteration during the manufacturing process of the essential commodity or even thereafter he becomes .....

The State Vs. Dulal Hazra and anr.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: 1987CriLJ857

..... district howrah in furtherance of common intention of you both did commit murder by intentionally or knowingly causing the death of sm ..... true the other part of the confession that the appellants committed theft of various articles from the almirah and other receptacles ..... still then it could not be said that the appellants committed murder of the deceased in making this submission reliance was .....

Turner Vs. Murray

Court: US Supreme Court

..... questions concerning possible racial bias is triggered whenever a violent interracial crime has been committed see ross v massachusetts 414 u s 1080 1973 marshall j dissenting from denial ..... the unjustifiable presumption that jurors are racially biased ii until today a trial judge committed an unconstitutional abuse of discretion by refusing to inquire into racial prejudice only when .....

Morris Vs. Mathews

Court: US Supreme Court

..... failed to prove the killing was done while the defendant was committing or fleeing immediately after committing aggravated robbery but that the killing was nonetheless purposely done you ..... shall purposely cause the death of another while committing or attempting to commit or while fleeing immediately after committing or attempting to commit kidnapping rape aggravated arson or arson aggravated .....