Commitment - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: commitment Year: 1953 Page 1 of about 1,432 results (0.051 seconds)T.B. Mukerji Vs. the State
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Dec-18-1953
Reported in: AIR1954All501
..... confusion and complications and the accused will be very much prejudiced if the different offences committed by him at different times and in the course of the same transaction were combined ..... exclusive and independent and if the different accused charged with different offences or some offences committed at different times or in separate transactions were tried together at one trial it would .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTState of Bombay Vs. Vishwakant Shrikant
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Apr-17-1953
Reported in: AIR1954Bom109; (1953)55BOMLR719
..... corruption act widened the scope of the offences which could be committed by a public servant it created for the first time the ..... cannot possibly be said that the words alleged to have been committed by a public servant would be unnecessary if the intention ..... the public servant from office at the time the offence was committed inasmuch as upon this interpretation sanction would be necessary even when .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTState Vs. Abdul Rahaman Mandal
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Aug-07-1953
Reported in: AIR1953Cal792
..... the question was raised before the accused were actually placed on their trial and the commitments were quashed with directions that the provisions disregarded should be duly complied with and the ..... disregard of these provisions while it will certainly entitle the aggrieved party to have a commitment quashed on the ground of such contravention will not entitle the aggrieved person to challenge .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBridges Vs. United States
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-15-1953
..... or disposition of any real or personal property of the united states or 3 committed in connection with the negotiation procurement award performance payment for interim financing cancelation or ..... united states these are alternative disjunctive provisions one addresses itself to the conspiracy to commit substantive offenses specified under other statutes the other to a conspiracy to defraud the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTK. Jayarama Iyer Vs. the State of Hyderabad
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-28-1953
Reported in: 1954CriLJ464
..... a public servant and dishonestly misappropriated and converted the same to his private use thus committing criminal breach of trust punishable under section 409 indian penal code 342 hyderabad penal code ..... for any other person any valuable thing or pecuniary advantage 2 any public servant who commits criminal misconduct in the discharge of his duty shall be punishable with imprisonment for a .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTUmrao Lal Vs. State
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Oct-05-1953
Reported in: AIR1954All424
..... correct statement later what he does subsequently has absolutely no bearing on the offence already committed by him the offence is not purged or wiped off by subsequent repentance or retraction ..... a dishonest intention even if the dishonest intention has not been carried out if persons committing those offences are not entitled to locus paenitentiae there is no justification for saying that .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNitya Nand Prem Lal Vs. the State
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Oct-23-1953
Reported in: AIR1954P& H89
..... this first information report that the police party became a party of persons engaged in committing an offence the offence being aiding abetting instigating and conspiring with chaman lal in corrupting ..... happened in the present case is worse because here the magistrate joined the police in committing the offence of the abetment of the abetment of criminal misconduct in discharge of official .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSunil Chandra Roy and anr. Vs. the State
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Apr-27-1953
Reported in: AIR1954Cal305,57CWN962
..... some men are creating disturbance puspa pal who actually received the message stated before the committing magistrate that nirmal had mentioned some tenants but before this court he deposed that ..... most of the witnesses for the prosecution have already deposed three times once before the committing magistrate and then successively at two sessions trials besides almost three years have elapsed since .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAjit Kumar Roy Vs. Surendra Nath Ghose
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: May-28-1953
Reported in: AIR1953Cal733,57CWN627
..... is that in the former case only defendants who had committed default of the requisite nature and number after the amending ..... in a suit terminated before the act could not have committed it is thus not that persons similarly circumstanced have been differently ..... that this nonsense resulted from the fact that the legislature committed a blunder by forgetting to make consequential amendments in section 18 .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRadha Nath Dhara and ors. Vs. the State
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Apr-22-1953
Reported in: AIR1953Cal602,58CWN243
..... to tender for cross examination all witnesses called before the committing magistrate mr mukherjee has referred to a later ruling nayan ..... withholding of two witnesses who had been examined in the committing court but not tendered for cross examination and from the ..... by the prosecution with reference to his differing statements in the committing court the other witness p w 8 was similarly questioned .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial