Commitment - Judgment Search Results

Ajit Kumar Palit Vs. the State

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR1961Cal560,1961CriLJ617,65CWN977

..... unlike courts of session special courts may take cognizance of offences without the accused being committed for trial it preserves the code of criminal procedure and makes its provisions applicable ..... a court constituted under the ordinance may take cognizance of offences without the accused being committed to sessions for trial section 193 of the criminal procedure code does not therefore apply to .....

Monroe Vs. Pape

Court: US Supreme Court

..... to any person or persons having knowledge that any of the specified wrongs are being committed mr poland speaking for the house conferees about the sherman proposal to make municipalities ..... without even the asserted justification of belief by the intruders that the inhabitants were presently committing some criminal act within physical abuse and the calculated degradation of insult and forced .....

Culombe Vs. Connecticut

Court: US Supreme Court

..... complaint and warrant any person who such officer has reasonable grounds to believe has committed or is committing a felony any person so arrested shall be presented with reasonable promptness before ..... confession made during illegal detention due to failure promptly to carry a prisoner before a committing magistrate whether or not the confession is the result of torture physical or psychological .....

Mcneal Vs. Culver

Court: US Supreme Court

..... 111 2 the judgment of conviction and sentence and 3 the commitment and asserted that petitioner was being lawfully imprisoned under the ..... tried and convicted assault to murder not assault with intent to commit felony actually exists under the florida law williams v state supra ..... state prison not exceeding twenty years an assault with intent to commit any other felony shall be punished to an extent not .....

K.C. Sonrexa Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and ors.

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: AIR1963All33; 1963CriLJ38

..... require that a lawyer should vicariously make himself responsible for an offence which he never committed and in any event he will not be advancing his client s cause by remaining ..... then many cases would arise where the wrongdoers would escape punishment for though they have committed a crime evidence cannot be led against them to prove it the learned judge was .....

Ranbir Singh Sehgal Vs. State of Punjab

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1962SC510; [1962]Supp1SCR295

..... about or mix with other prisoners the statement of offences committed by the petitioner and the punishments inflicted on him filed ..... which constituted the prison offences the description of the offences committed suffices for the purpose of this register the entry is ..... 39 i am therefore of opinion that the jail authorities committed no discriminatory or illegal act against the appellant in keeping .....

Tulsidas Mundhra Vs. State of West Bengal

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: 1962CriLJ659

..... opinion that such evidence acne documents disclose no grounds torn committing the accused person for trial record his reasons and discharge ..... of discharge section 207a provides for expeditious disposal of a commitment inquiry therefore sub section 4 does not provide for examination ..... for me to decide the general section whether in a commitment inquiry examination of the accused is compulsory mr bhose .....

Shaw Vs. Director of Public Prosecutions

Court: House of Lords

..... the facts proved to see whether they disclose that the accused committed some offence of more limited scope than conspiracy to corrupt ..... a conspiracy to this end is indictable as a conspiracy to commit a criminal offence alternatively 2 a conspiracy to corrupt morals is ..... indictable as a conspiracy to commit a wrongful act which is calculated to cause public injury the .....

Pinjare Karimbhai Dedubhai Vs. Shukla Hariprasad Manishankar

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: (1962)3GLR529

provision of law or with material irregularity that is by committing some error of procedure in the course of the trial

Scruttons Limited Vs. Midland Silicones Limited

Court: House of Lords

the respondents it was not argued that they had not committed a tort in damaging the respondents goods i can see