Commitment - Judgment Search Results

Schall Vs. Martin

Court: US Supreme Court

..... the commissioner of mental health or secure placement 353 1 353 5 unless the juvenile committed one of the designated felonies the court must order the least restrictive available alternative ..... such a statute would unavoidably result in detention of some juveniles who would not have committed any offenses if released because of the impossibility of reliably predicting the behavior of individual .....

C.N. Krishna Murthy Vs. Abdul Subban and anr.

Court: Karnataka

..... attention of the authorities concerned as occasion arises and opportunity offers each of the defalcations committed by him constitutes a separate offence see emperor v ram autar lal air 1942 pat ..... after going into the question whether the prosecution has satisfactorily established that the accused had committed any criminal breach of trust during the charge period 31 according to the prosecution the .....

Escorts Ltd. and Another Vs. Union of India and Others

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: [1985]57CompCas241(Bom)

..... power exercisable by the lic is not pure contractual but referable to a statute which defines the limitations of its authority the ..... power exercisable by the lic is not purely contractual but referable to a stature which defines the limitation of its authority the ..... the statue from using its majority shareholding from committing an illegality and from removing the directors only because they have not acted .....

Firefighters Vs. Stotts

Court: US Supreme Court

title vii to prohibit such remedies in fact the conference committee stated in any area where the new law does not

Pennhurst State Sch. Vs. Halderman

Court: US Supreme Court

..... faced with the argument that an allegation that a government official committed a tort sufficed to distinguish the official from the sovereign ..... is valid and constitutional but wrongfully administered by them commit or threaten to commit acts of wrong or injury to the rights and ..... consisted of its officers and since the state could not commit an illegal act any such act was imputed to government .....

Dixson Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

..... 1 being influenced in his performance of any official act or 2 being influenced to commit or aid in committing or to collude in or allow any fraud or make opportunity for the commission of ..... 1983 for example the illinois bribery statute provides that a person receiving money or property commits bribery if he receives retains or agrees to accept any property or personal advantage which .....

Shyam Sahu and Two ors. Vs. State

Court: Orissa

Reported in: 58(1984)CLT331; 1984(II)OLR929

..... matters rule 58 provides sessions trials should ordinarily be held in the order in which commitments are made sessions judge should however exercise his discretion in the matter of giving priority ..... for securing them from the chemical examiner concerned with reference to the correspondence of the committing magistrate with the chemical examiner simultaneously he should fix up the trial of the case .....

C.T. Mathew and anr. Vs. Govt. of India, Home Dept. (C.i.B.) and ors.

Court: Kerala

Reported in: 1985CriLJ1316

..... regarding the jurisdiction of a high court to grant anticipatory bail in respect of offences committed outside its territorial limits 6 article 21 ensures that no person shall be deprived of ..... concurrent jurisdiction empowered to grant anticipatory bail the court within whose jurisdiction the offence is committed and the court within whose territory the person is sought to be arrested conflict of .....

Nishit Kumar Sikdar Gobinda Saraya Vs. Sunil Kumar Bose

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR1984Cal371,88CWN971

exclusion it would be useful to remember that the judicial committee in the well known case of karnani industrial bank v

Dajya Moshya Bhil and ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1984SC1717; 1984CriLJ1728; 1984(2)Crimes368(SC); 1984(2)SCALE188; 1984Supp(1)SCC373

..... say that appellant 1 who was charged with substantive offence of committing murder participated in the quarrel it is not suggested that ..... stones does it permit an inference of common intention to commit murder appellant 1 the principal culprit charged with substantive offence ..... 3 shaded the common intention with appellant 1 namely to commit murder of gunjarya 10 all the circumstances when viewed in .....