Commitment - Judgment Search Results

Jones Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

..... necessarily is a rational basis for equal protection purposes for distinguishing between civil commitment and commitment of insanity acquitees see reply brief for petitioner 22 23 brief for united ..... the question whether the differences between insanity acquitees and other candidates for civil commitment justify committing insanity acquitees indefinitely as d c code 24 301 1981 provides without the government .....

Barefoot Vs. Estelle

Court: US Supreme Court

..... and james grigson who in response to hypothetical questions testified that petitioner would probably commit further acts of violence and represent a continuing threat to society the jury ..... particularly incapable of dealing with information relating to the likelihood that the defendant will commit other crimes and similar predictive judgments aba project on standards for criminal justice sentencing .....

Solem Vs. Helm

Court: US Supreme Court

..... imprisonment was not authorized including a third offense of heroin dealing or aggravated assault criminals committing any of these offenses ordinarily would be thought more deserving of punishment than one ..... are subject to appellate scrutiny to ensure that they are proportional to the crime committed the court then sets forth three assertedly objective factors to guide the determination of .....

Barclay Vs. Florida

Court: US Supreme Court

..... under florida law and the federal constitution that the trial court did not commit reversible error of constitutional magnitude by considering nonstatutory aggravating factors and that the ..... statutory aggravating circumstances and one nonstatutory aggravating factor that petitioner has the propensity to commit murder the florida supreme court without comment approved all of these findings and .....

Zant Vs. Stephens

Court: US Supreme Court

..... in addition the jury s attention is focused on the characteristics of the person who committed the crime does he have a record of prior convictions for capital offenses are there ..... page 462 u s 915 for a capital felony and whether the rape had been committed in the course of committing another capital felony namely the armed robbery of allen carver the court also instructed pursuant .....

Energy Reserves Group Vs. Kansas P. and L. Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

the fact that there was a close vote at the committee stage and that some of the committee dissenters expressed the

Kesavan Natesan Vs. Madhavan Peethambharan and ors.

Court: Kerala

Reported in: 1984CriLJ324

..... thereafter the 1st respondent instituted a private complaint in the same committing court the complaint was transferred to the judicial magistrate of the ..... under the code that some person whether known or unknown has committed an offence but does not include a police report the ..... offence is triable exclusively by the court of sessions he shall commit the case to the court of session the section also .....

Operating Engineers Vs. Jones

Court: US Supreme Court

adverse to their employers interest or when they refuse to commit unfair labor practices the discharge of supervisors page 460 u

Marshall Vs. Lonberger

Court: US Supreme Court

..... the purpose of proving in any way that the defendant committed the offenses for which he is being tried today tr 1178 1180 ..... the sense that it constitutes an intelligent admission that the accused committed the offense unless the accused has received real notice of the ..... it was also unreliable evidence that the defendant had in fact committed the prior offense because the defendant had not had the benefit .....

Bowen Vs. Usps

Court: US Supreme Court

..... is entitled the court finds that its apportionment rule is consistent with the union s commitment to the employer under the arbitration clause of the collective bargaining agreement ante at 459 ..... 228 however the court in no way identifies a legitimate source of the union s commitment under the arbitration clause that it will bear exclusive liability for post arbitration date backpay .....