Comment - Judgment Search Results

The Raymond Woollen Mills Ltd. and anr. Vs. Union of India and anr.

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 48(1992)DLT20; 1992(23)DRJ461

b n kirpal j 1 a number of manufacturers of cement have filed these writ petitions inter alia challenging the...

Morales Vs. Trans World Airlines, Inc.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... and from reasonable inferences therefrom but also omitting or obscuring a material restriction comment this guideline and the following guidelines restate individual states false advertising and deceptive ..... language such as substantial restrictions apply the statement restrictions apply is not sufficient comment for safety reasons naag concluded that lengthy written disclosures on billboards are .....

Peer Mohammed Siddique Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: 1992(40)ECC413; ILR1992KAR3484; 1992(4)KarLJ378

..... on 31 12 1991 the d r i authorities despatched their comments with the translation by ordinary post to the state government they ..... the home department on 17 12 1991 and the letter seeking comments and also the translation of the representation was despatched by the ..... accept their explanation that there was postal delay in receiving the comments or their case that the letter dated 31 12 91 was .....

Satnam Singh Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 1992CriLJ3961; 1992(2)Crimes1133; 1992(23)DRJ365

..... the proposal was received by cofeposa unit and when the comments were called from sponsoring authority what cofeposa unit was doing ..... was the responsibility of the respondent to have collected the comments expeditiously the office of the sponsoring authority is situated in ..... could not have taken 17 days for receiving or sending the comments from one authority to the other on the representation of .....

Dhiraj Singh Madan Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 1993CriLJ514; 1992(2)Crimes903; 1992(23)DRJ257

..... on 4 6 91 to the sponsoring authority asking for their comments comments were not received up to 12 6 91 thereforee a ..... was placed before the joint secretary cofeposa who desired to have comments of the sponsoring authority letter to this effect was issued ..... holidays thereforee there was no delay even otherwise for collecting the comments from the central government by the cofeposa unit it required .....

Birendra Kumar Rai Alias Virendra Kumar Rai Vs. Union of India (Uoi) a ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1993SC962; 1993(41)BLJR219; 1993CriLJ158; 1992(3)Crimes398(SC); 1993(43)ECC81; JT1992(5)SC264; 1995(5)SCALE210; (1993)1SCC272; [1992]Supp1SCR391

..... be delivered at lucknow and the other petitioner s representation with comment at delhi he proceeded to gorakhpur his home on 24th ..... letter dated 11th january 1991 sent back along with the comment annexed a reference was made that in future representation be ..... the constraints of office work load in other official matters the comments offered by the narcotics control bureau varanasi were examined vis .....

income-tax Officer Vs. Jnanodayam Sabha

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Cochin

Reported in: (1993)46ITD216(Coch.)

..... discrepancies in dates in respect of receipts and payments and also commented that the title deeds in respect of lands have not been ..... accounts require improvements even though the ito was aware of the comments of the auditor he has not chosen to reject the accounts ..... he has chosen to test the veracity or otherwise of the comments of the auditor but he proceeded to compute the income disallowing .....

Rajan Ajitkumar Sarkar Alias Rajan Bangali Vs. Shri S. Ramamurthi, Com ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 1994(2)BomCR332

..... of india also asked the state government to furnish parawise comments parawise comments were received by the union of india on 25th november ..... it was received by him on 7th november 1991 parawise comments were prepared in consultation with the police prosecutor on 11th ..... authority will curtail the period taken for sending the parawise comments in order to avoid delay in disposing of the representation .....

Planned Parenthood of Southeastern PA. Vs. Casey

Court: US Supreme Court

..... have joined are more important than those with which i disagree i shall therefore first comment on significant areas of agreement and then explain the limited character of my disagreement 912 ..... the constitution the court concluded that that word has application only postnatally id at 157 commenting on the contingent property interests of the unborn that are generally represented by guardians ad .....

United States Vs. Alvarez-machain

Court: US Supreme Court

..... treaties the case law from the states and the writings of commentators and reached the following conclusion a person who has been brought ..... the messenger failed to present the warrant to the proper authorities commentators have suggested that the seizure of ker in the aftermath ..... state may proceed to prosecute him under its laws 432 and comment c 26just as rauscher had standing to raise the treaty .....