Comment - Judgment Search Results

Price Waterhouse Vs. Hopkins

Court: US Supreme Court

..... in making its decision did in fact take into account all of the partners comments including the comments that were motivated by stereotypical notions about women s proper deportment footnote 16 page ..... for reconsideration the following year footnote 1 thirteen of the 32 partners who had submitted comments on hopkins supported her bid for partnership three partners recommended that her candidacy be .....

RobIn Alias Robert Sanna Joseph Vs. V.K. Saraf, Commissioner of Police ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 1990CriLJ342

..... the division bench observed as follows the government of india also asked for parawise comments on representation presumably the representation received by it from the petitioner without sending a ..... requested central government to send copy of representation to enable it to furnish parawise comments it was only after receipt of copy of representation the government of maharashtra sent .....

Aajkaal Publishers Pvt. Ltd. and anr. Vs. Commercial Tax Officer, Mani ...

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: 94CWN281,[1990]78STC221(Cal)

..... which defines newspaper as newspaper meaning any printed periodical work connected with public news or comments on public news it also referred to section 2 of the parliamentary proceedings protection of ..... publication act 1956 which defines newspapers as meaning any printed periodical containing public news or comments on public news the orissa high court also referred to other statutes namely the .....

Purnendu Narayan Chakraborty Vs. the Hon'ble the Chief Justice, High C ...

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: (1990)IILLJ116Cal

..... to the petitioner he could not make any representation against the comments in the acr for 1979 because he was in the andamans ..... registrar ii to examine the 16 officers cases and offer his comments accordingly the additional registrar ii examined each of the 16 cases ..... 1985 in relation to the petitioner the additional registrar ii s comments are as follows c c r out turnjudgmentadmngeneral13 3 83 22 .....

South Carolina Vs. Gathers

Court: US Supreme Court

..... understanding of the circumstances of the crime the south carolina supreme court concluded that those comments conveyed the suggestion respondent deserved a death sentence because the victim was a religious man ..... evidence introduced at the penalty phase that he was precluded from rebutting rather the prosecutor commented page 490 u s 823 upon evidence introduced without objection at the guilt phase .....

Hiralal and Etc. Vs. District Magistrate and ors.

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: 1990CriLJ689

..... the representation was sent to the senior superintendent of police allahabad to make available the comments of the police on the said representation as the same were considered necessary the police ..... placed before the advisory board the representation meant for the central government along with the comments of the district magistrate allahabad was also sent to the ministry of home affairs new .....

J.K. Synthetics Ltd. Vs. the Municipal Board of Nimbahera and anr.

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: AIR1991Raj1; 1990(1)WLN689

..... on that proceedings were drawn and the matter was discussed at several levels and comments were invited from all concerned eventually proclamation under section 6 was issued objections were ..... to be made through the magistrate of the district the district magistrate made his comments the revenue divisional commissioner intervenes in the channel of communication between the district magistrate .....

Ramesh Chandra Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: 1990(1)WLN341

..... 17 6 1989 directing the dist magistrate kota to send his comments the comments of the dist magistrate were received on 23 6 89 the ..... directed the detaining authority viz the district magistrate kota to send his comments it is thus evident that no action was taken on the ..... itself makes the further detention of the detnu illegal 15 the comments of the district magistrate were received on 22 6 1989 the .....

Uma Shanker Verma Vs. Superintendent, Central Jail and ors.

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: 1990CriLJ2114

..... when the communication made by the central government requiring the sponsoring authority to submit his comments was received by the sponsoring authority assuming that it was received by the sponsoring ..... counter affidavit filed on behalf of the sponsoring authority to explain the delay in making comments on the representation submitted by the petitioner against the order of detention 29 article .....

Gurmej Singh Vs. State of Punjab

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: 1990CriLJ1413

..... to why the district authorities at amritsar could not sent their comments to the state before 23rd december 1988 the oral submissions ..... police amritsar as to why they could not send their parawise comments concerning the said representation earlier one cannot be considered sufficient ..... it is also pertinent to note that even after the comments were received on 22nd dec 1988 it took another six .....