Comment - Judgment Search Results

Arizona Vs. Washington

Court: US Supreme Court

..... argument granted the prosecutor s motion for a mistrial predicated on improper and prejudicial comment during defense counsel s opening statement that evidence had been hidden from respondent at ..... judge granted the prosecutor s motion for a mistrial predicated on improper and prejudicial comment during defense counsel s opening statement in a subsequent habeas corpus proceeding a federal district .....

Lakeside Vs. Oregon

Court: US Supreme Court

..... refusal to testify violates the constitutional privilege the court was there concerned only with adverse comment whereas here the very purpose of the instruction is to remove from the jury s ..... the defendant s objection in the griffin case the petitioner argues the court said that comment on the refusal to testify violates the constitutional privilege against compulsory self incrimination 380 u .....

Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. Vs. Nrdc

Court: US Supreme Court

..... 363 more than 40 individuals and organizations representing a wide variety of interests submitted written comments on january 17 1973 the licensing board held a planning session to schedule the ..... not meant to require detailed discussion of the environmental effects of alternatives put forward in comments when these effects cannot be readily ascertained and the alternatives are deemed only remote and .....

Fcc Vs. National Citizens Committee

Court: US Supreme Court

..... various broadcast and newspaper interests public interest groups and academic and research entities filed comments on the proposed rules in addition a number of studies were submitted dealing with ..... of diversity present in the mass media in march 1974 the commission requested further comments directed primarily to the core problem of newspaper television station cross ownership memorandum opinion .....

Gordhandas Hargovandas and anr. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, Bombay ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: (1979)12CTR(Bom)19; [1980]126ITR560(Bom)

..... mentioning ornaments trinkets and jewellery after these facts and materials have been extracted the tribunal comments that the will gives no details regarding any ornaments trinkets and jewellery forming part of ..... which we have adverted earlier were shown to the tribunal the tribunal at this point comments that there was nothing in the refinery certificates to show that any ornaments had been .....

Thaneshwar Singh Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 1979CriLJ94; 15(1979)DLT245; ILR1979Delhi170; 1979RLR46

..... secretary home 28 1 1978 the home department asked for the comments of the customs department on the representation sending to the customs ..... a copy of the representation 8 2 1978 comments from the collector of customs receiver vide letter dated 7 2 ..... taking so much time the home department only asked for the comments of the customs department the question is whether any fundamental or .....

Regents of Univ. of California Vs. Bakke

Court: US Supreme Court

..... at 12675 sen allott id at 6561 sen kuchel these fragmentary comments fall far short of supporting a congressional intent to prohibit ..... permitting and in some circumstances requiring race conscious action see comment the philadelphia plan a study in the dynamics of executive ..... manager for title vi footnote 5 14 representative abernethy s comments were typical title vi has been aptly described as the .....

United States Steel Corp. Vs. Multistate Tax Comm'n

Court: US Supreme Court

..... has never as yet been subjected to any exact judicial or other examination a learned commentator however supposes that the former ordinarily relate to subjects of great national magnitude and importance ..... necessary duration of congressional silence before consent may be inferred has been suggested by one commentator note the constitutionality of the multistate tax compact 29 vand l rev 453 460 1976 .....

Franks Vs. Delaware

Court: US Supreme Court

..... has evoked such widespread opposition to the flat nonimpeachment rule from the commentators footnote 7 from the american law institute in its model code of ..... appears this is no longer the majority rule among the states compare comment 7 seton hall l rev 827 844 1976 about half of the ..... 48 50 1972 note 23 drake l rev 623 638 639 1974 comment 7 seton hall l rev 827 859 860 1976 footnote 8 petitioner .....

United States Vs. United States Gypsum Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... to their generally disfavored status see generally ali model penal code comment on 2 05 p 140 tent draft no 4 1955 w ..... between these formulations is a narrow one see ali model penal code comment on 2 02 p 125 tent draft no 4 1955 we ..... direction the conversation will take at such a meeting unexpected questions or comments can generate unintended and misleading impressions of the judge s subjective .....