Comment - Judgment Search Results

Jagpalsingh Sajjansingh Vs. Digamber Tulsiram and ors.

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: AIR1970Bom122; (1969)71BOMLR545; ILR1970Bom592; 1969MhLJ347

..... the statute itself and further that provision not requiring the petitioner to file the do comments accompanying the application for revision the rules made under section 111 2 regulating the procedure ..... application in fact rule 45 seems to suggestthat the certified or original copies of do comments filed with the application shall ordinarily be returned to the party concerned in framing this .....

Rishi Kesh Singh and ors. Vs. the State

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: AIR1970All51; 1970CriLJ132

..... to the various reported cases brought to our notice making comments wherever necessary 32 air1962sc605 is the leading case on the ..... or who started the marpit the principles indicated above while making comments on the first illustration shall apply with equal force to ..... har prasad ghasi ram gupta v state air1952bom184 no further comments are therefore necessary 83 the observations of mitter j in .....

Fontaine Vs. California

Court: US Supreme Court

..... burden of proving beyond a reasonable doubt that the erroneous comments of the prosecutor and the trial judge s instruction ..... held that the prosecutor s argument and the judge s comment violated petitioner s privilege against self incrimination under griffin however ..... burden of proving beyond a reasonable doubt that the erroneous comments and instruction did not contribute to petitioner s conviction .....

Alderman Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

..... society that is obnoxious to free men footnote 3 3 but for reasons which many commentators charge are related more to convenience and judicial prudence than to constitutional principles courts of ..... observance of which is essential to the welfare of all persons footnote 3 7 accordingly commentators have urged that the necessary implication of the fourth amendment is that any defendant against .....

Ginsberg Vs. New York

Court: US Supreme Court

..... h and we imply no view whatever on questions of their constitutionality footnote 6 many commentators including many committed to the proposition that n o general restriction on expression in terms ..... problems in obscenity legislation protecting children 54 geo l j 1379 1966 footnote 7 one commentator who argues that obscenity legislation might be constitutionally defective as an imposition of a single .....

Perspective Publications (P) Ltd. and anr. Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1971SC221; (1971)73BOMLR57; 1971CriLJ268; [1969]2SCR779

..... 216 where contempt proceedings had been taken in respect of editorial comments published in a newspaper based on a news item that the ..... be allowed to suffer the scrutiny and respectful even though outspoken comments of ordinary men 14 it was however held that there was ..... be allowed to suffer the scrutiny and respectful even though outspoken comments of ordinary men 4 a distinction must be made between a .....

Flast Vs. Cohen

Court: US Supreme Court

..... source of some confusion and the object of considerable criticism the confusion has developed as commentators have tried to determine whether frothingham establishes a constitutional bar to taxpayer suits or ..... been criticized as depending on assumptions not consistent with modern conditions for example some commentators have pointed out that a number of corporate taxpayers today have a federal tax .....

E.T. Sen (Retd.) Vs. Edatata Narayanan and ors.

Court: Delhi

Reported in: AIR1969Delhi201; 1969CriLJ884; 5(1969)DLT348; ILR1969Delhi157

..... trial whether civil or cri minal is a grave contempt comments on pending proceedings if emanating from the parties or their ..... coming from independent sources the question in all cases of comment on pending proceedings is nto whether the publication does interfere ..... caste community occupation or profession to which he belongs whether comments holding up a party to public ridicule or which prejudices .....

Pickering Vs. Board of Education

Court: US Supreme Court

..... the first amendment rights they would otherwise enjoy as citizens to comment on matters of public interest in connection with the operation of ..... be situations in which with reference to certain areas of public comment a teacher may have special obligations to his superiors it simply ..... holds that in this case with respect to the particular public comment made by pickering he is more like a member of the .....

Anderson Vs. Nelson

Court: US Supreme Court

..... the district court issued the writ holding that the prosecutor s comment on the failure of petitioner to testify at his trial made ..... page 390 u s 524 error in a case where such comment is extensive where an inference of guilt from silence is ..... instructions violated griffin it is also conceded that the prosecutor s comments violated griffin while the evidence against petitioner was sufficient to convict .....