Client - Judgment Search Results

Mohawk Industries, Inc. Vs. Carpenter

Court: US Supreme Court

..... correct that an order to disclose privileged information intrudes on the confidentiality of attorney client communications but deferring review until final judgment does not meaningfully reduce the ex ..... from contempt citations facilitate immediate review of some of the more consequential attorney client privilege rulings moreover protective orders are available to limit the spillover effects of .....

in Re Mce (Appellant) (Northern Ireland), in Re M (Appellant) (Norther ...

Court: House of Lords

..... carswell that ripa does permit the covert surveillance of communications between lawyers and their clients even though these may be covered by legal professional privilege and notwithstanding the ..... in a statute which authorises surveillance of communications and consultations between a lawyer and client provided that the statute includes safeguards which ensure that such authorisation complies in .....

Anupama Wine Distributors Vs. Tilaknagar Industries Ltd.

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2009(4)BomCR331; [2009]151CompCas395(Bom); [2009]91SCL419(Bom)

..... insurance charges financial charges and other expenses from our clients with regard to excise duty our clients state that your clients have defrauded our clients by claiming the cost of money provided by your ..... amount lying in the joint account of ugar sugar works limited be transferred thereafter your clients in connivance with mr rajabhau shirgaonkar cmd of ugar sugar works limited conspired and .....

Hindusthan National Glass and Industries Limited and anr. Vs. Reserve ...

Court: Kolkata

..... being in force if any dispute arises amongst credit information companies credit institutions borrowers and clients on matters relating to business of credit information and for which no remedy has ..... on derivative receivables is made in accordance with rbi guidelines the derivative limit sanctioned to clients is part of the overall limit sanctioned post credit appraisal collateral is accepted on .....

Harbison Vs. Bell

Court: US Supreme Court

..... is not expected to provide each service enumerated in subsection e for every client rather counsel s representation includes only those judicial proceedings transpiring subsequent to her ..... appointed counsel we further hold that 3599 authorizes federally appointed counsel to represent their clients in state clemency proceedings and entitles them to compensation for that representation accordingly .....

G.E. Capital Transportation Financial Services Ltd. Vs. Amritajit Mitr ...

Court: Kolkata

..... contents thereof they are not entitled to get any unconditional order of injunction restraining his client from enforcing the obligations of the plaintiffs arising out of the agreement according to mr ..... the defendant and thus the learned trial judge could not grant any injunction restraining his client from enforcing the terms of the agreements unless the plaintiffs were directed to return the .....

international Society for Krishna Consciousness, a Society Registered ...

Court: Karnataka

..... of a counsel to the court and his duty to the client it is the former which prevails in the following words when ..... applications on the other hand his duty is to advise his client for refraining from making allegations of this nature in such applications ..... v chalapathi appearing for respondent no 1 categorically submitted that his clients i e respondent no 1 had full confidence in the court .....

Bang Securities Pvt. Ltd. Vs. the Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2009(111)BomLR1653; 2009BusLR461(Bom); [2009]314ITR256(Bom); 2009(4)MhLj598; [2009]182TAXMAN176(Bom)

..... than the normal volume in usual business of the assessee with other clients v it was unusual that in both the transactions m s camelot ..... by m s bang securities pvt ltd the assessee has used the client code allotted to m s palombee securities pvt ltd for these ..... the camelot is not genuine because the petitioner has not allotted the client code to camelot is also without any merit because from the .....

Union of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. MartIn Lottery Agencies Ltd.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: (2009)223CTR(SC)321; JT2009(11)SC151; 2009(7)SCALE341(1); (2009)12SCC209; [2009]17STJ237(SC); 2009[14]STR593; [2009]20STT203; 2009(6)LC2739(SC); (2009)24VST1(SC); 2009AIRSCW5301

..... 4 1 services provided in relation to promotion or marketing of service provided by the client is leviable to service tax under business auxiliary service organization and selling of lotteries are ..... relation to promotion or marketing of games of chance organized conducted or promoted by the client are covered under the existing definition of business auxiliary service amendment is only for removal .....

Bhagwandas Auto Finance Ltd. and ors. Vs. Citicorp Finance (India) Lim ...

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR2009Cal231

..... purported agreement between the parties is a forged document and threatened the plaintiff that his clients would file appropriate civil and criminal proceedings against the plaintiff for creation of such ..... has vehemently opposed the aforesaid contention of mr chatterjee and submitted that already his client has resorted to the proceeding of arbitration pursuant to such agreement and the appellants .....