Client - Judgment Search Results

United India Insurance Co. Vs. Sh. Lalngena and anr.

Court: Guwahati

s k kar j 1 the petitioner before me united india insurance co ltd intended to invoke the extraordinary review...

Sebi Vs. Sound Craft Industries Ltd.

Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

..... market pattern such being the case the following allegations against our client are baseless and the proposed charges must therefore be dropped a ..... the basis of judging the overall conduct and character of our client which has been exemplary truth is above law and a ..... at different times which may involve two members or atleast two clients with one member some of these transactions were seen initially .....

Mickens Vs. Taylor

Court: US Supreme Court

..... cannot possibly determine how best to represent a new client unless that client is willing to provide the lawyer with a truthful ..... because a lawyer s fiduciary relationship with his deceased client survives the client s death swidler berlin v united states 524 u ..... a representation that involves a conflict of interest unless the client has waived the conflict university publications of america national .....

T.J. Stock Broking Services Pvt. Vs. the Securities and Exchange Board ...

Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

..... he submitted that sebi circular does not specifically prescribe the requirement brokerwise but it is client wise and since the interpretation of the circular having a bearing on the culpability of ..... counsel stated that fresh charges grounds such as alleged margin deficiency incomplete details in the client registration form etc raised in the argument cannot be accepted at the appellate stage to .....

R.B. Khandelwal (Director of Vs. Securities and Exchange Board of

Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

..... shri khandelwal while signing the contract notes should have found out the motives of the client and having not done so should bear responsibility for the irregularities in the transactions undertaken ..... broker shri ranganayakulu submitted that since anand securities was not a sub broker but a client of the appellant the question of rules and regulations applicable to giving separate terminal to .....

Lkp Securities Ltd. Vs. the Securities and Exchange Board of India

Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

Reported in: (2003)41SCL1SAT

..... learned counsel referring to the submissions of the learned counsel appearing for the respondent that client registration forms were not filled up properly and that adequate margin was not collected submitted ..... clear distinction major distinction is that the appellant did not collect sufficient margin from the client whereas lkpss had collected the requisite margin and hedged the risk to some extent .....

Sebi Vs. Shri Rajkumar C Basantani,

Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

..... selling member was m s rajkumar chainrai basantani and the client both buying and selling was shri dinesh patel this transaction ..... different times which may involve two members or atleast two clients with one member some of these transactions were seen initially ..... introducer common telephone number only substantiate the finding that these clients were merely acting as front to the member 45 shri .....

Videocon International Ltd. Vs. Securities and Exchange Board of

Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

..... similar is the case with the respondents observation that whenever the clients of these brokers i e damayanti group were short of ..... a colour of purchase and sale of shares and whenever the clients of damayanti group was short of funds videocon group through equity ..... out package and stated that the fund flow of the purchasing clients the concerned brokers etc revealed that these brokers received funds .....

Harish Uppal Vs. Union of India and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

..... the fiduciary character of the relationship between a lawyer and his client and since strike interferes with the administration of justice and ..... smooth functioning of the court they owe a duty to their client strikes interfere with administration of justice they cannot thus disrupt ..... from appearing in the courts he can be consulted by his clients he can give his legal opinion whenever sought for he .....

Gisbrecht Vs. Barnhart

Court: US Supreme Court

..... from the successful party s recovery characteristically in social security benefits cases attorneys and clients enter into contingent fee agreements specifying that the attorney s fee will be ..... that attorneys successfully representing social security claimants would not risk nonpayment by 791 their clients congress therefore authorized agency payment of fees directly to counsel from funds withheld .....