Client - Judgment Search Results

Upjohn Co. Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

..... certiorari in this case to address important questions concerning the scope of the attorney client privilege in the corporate context and the applicability of the work product doctrine in ..... confidential by the company footnote 5 consistent with the underlying purposes of the attorney client privilege these communications must be protected against compelled disclosure the court of appeals declined .....

Polk County Vs. Dodson

Court: US Supreme Court

..... u s 323 their ethical obligations public defenders do not he argues characteristically extend their clients the same undivided loyalty tendered by privately retained attorneys in support of this argument ..... in handling individual cases and therefore his ability to provide effective assistance to his clients is circumscribed to an extent not experienced by privately retained attorneys see e g .....

Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay and anr. Vs. Vijay Metal Works

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: AIR1982Bom6; 1981MhLJ798

..... a corporation or a company 4 section 126 protects the professional communications made by a client to his barrister attorney pleader of vakil it prohibits these persons from disclosing any communication ..... the footing that the communications between the legal advisers and their employer who is their client are the subject or legal professional privilege and i have never known it questioned there .....

D.R. Punjab Montogomery Transport Co. and anr. Vs. Raghuvanshi Pvt. Lt ...

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR1983Cal343,(1982)2CompLJ74(Cal),86CWN759

..... by instalments mr b mat lick after taking instructions from his clients had informed mr mahinder singh they were prepared to wait for ..... and without prejudice to the rights of mr b mallick s clients 20 the learned advocate for the appellant submitted that the form ..... also clearly stipulating that the same were without prejudice to his client s rights under the said decree dated 22nd sept 1970 after .....

H. A. Artists and Assocs., Inc. Vs. Actors' Equity Assn.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... minima theatrical agents are independent contractors who negotiate contracts and solicit employment for their clients the agents do not participate in the negotiation of collective bargaining agreements between equity ..... which provides that the maximum commission a theatrical agent may charge his client is 10 of the client s compensation in 1928 concerned with the high unemployment rates in the .....

P.V. Gopalkrishnan Vs. Kanaksha Gopalkrishnan (Mrs.)

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 1982(1)BomCR454a

..... are further embellishments in support he refers to a statement my client has reasons to suspect taking into consideration the medical report and ..... reasons why you were refusing to have sexual intercourse with my client and have the marriage consummated however the notice has to be ..... by mr dalvi these letters do not help mr dalvi s client the fact of going to the pilgrimage and the behaviour of .....

B. Himmat Singka and anr. Vs. Kuldip Industrial Corporation and ors.

Court: Himachal Pradesh

Reported in: 1981CriLJ1414

..... grounds being shown shri ahuja further states that his above referred clients are prepared to defend the various proceedings pending before the ..... wages act shri ahuja also states that his above referred clients further undertake to complete the accounts of the company within ..... in its order shri ahuia undertakes on behalf of his clients to produce all the other accounts books pass books bank .....

Ganga Sahai Rajinder Kumar Vs. Mauji Ram

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 1981(2)DRJ245

..... to you in respect of the shop in the tenancy of my client my client is a tenant under you in respect of four rooms situated in ..... purpose for which you sent the blank papers in the envelope to my client 26 it was urged by the learned counsel that the admission contained in ..... reply should have been sent to shri mauji ram the identity of the client of shri s k suri advocate could only be known from the .....

Gulf Oil Co. Vs. Bernard

Court: US Supreme Court

..... counsel this court or the administration of justice the order exempted attorney client communications initiated by the client and communications in the regular course of business it further stated that ..... forbid 1 communications between an attorney and his client or a prospective client who has on the initiative of the client or prospective client consulted with employed or proposed to employ the .....

United Commercial Bank Vs. Bank of India and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1981SC1426; (1981)83BOMLR379; 1981(1)SCALE548; (1981)2SCC766; [1981]3SCR300; 1981(13)LC653(SC)

..... it reads the said interim order makes it absolutely clear that our clients will in no way be liable and responsible to return the amounts ..... received under reserve and therefore our clients are in no way liable to pay any sum to uco bank ..... to uco bank in the circumstances we have been instructed by our clients to request you which we hereby do not to make any payment .....