Client - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: client Year: 2001 Page 1 of about 300 results (0.053 seconds)C.A. Abraham Vs. Madhya Pradesh Electricity Board and ors.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-02-2001
Reported in: 2003ACJ901
bhawani singh c j 1 this appeal arises out of the award of the motor accidents claims tribunal bhopal in...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJaypal Vs. Mehfooz Khan and ors.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-04-2001
Reported in: 2002(1)MPHT203; 2002(2)MPLJ38
orderbhawani singh c j 1 this appeal is directed against the award passed by the motor accidents claims tribunal seoni...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSonabai Vs. Bhabutsingh and ors.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-14-2001
Reported in: 2003ACJ1156; 2002(1)MPHT118; 2002(1)MPLJ542
orderbhawani singh c j 1 this appeal is directed against the award of motor accidents claims tribunal jabalpur in claim...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSterlite Industries (India) Ltd. Vs. Securities and Exchange Board of ...
Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT
Decided on: Oct-22-2001
..... of shares as i no payments were received from the client and purchase consideration was adjusted against amounts borrowed from shri ..... shares of sterlite both at bse and nse these common clients hereinafter called damayanti group built up unusually large positions in ..... of shares as i no payments were received from the client and purchase consideration was adjusted against amounts borrowed from shri .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTLegal Services Corp. Vs. Velazquez
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Feb-28-2001
..... funds appropriated by congress to local grantee organizations providing free legal assistance to indigent clients in inter alia welfare benefits claims in every annual appropriations act since 1996 ..... congress has prohibited lsc funding of any organization that represented clients in an effort to amend or otherwise challenge existing welfare law grantees cannot continue .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCredit Rating Information Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai
Decided on: May-03-2001
Reported in: (2003)84ITD247(Mum.)
..... assigns the initial rating this rating is conveyed to the client the client either accepts the rating or rejects it or asks for ..... fresh rating is given which is again communicated to the client and the client prefers to either use the rating or not to use ..... request letter part of which is reproduced above indicates that the client will communicate its decision in writing within one month of assigning .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAdwise Advertising Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-01-2001
Reported in: 2001(131)ELT529(Mad); (2001)2MLJ366; 2006[2]STR375; [2007]6STT358
..... advertisements this would no doubt include the gross amount charged by the agency from the client for making or preparing the advertisement material irrespective of the fact that the advertising agency ..... says that section 67 d considers only the transaction between the advertising agency and its clients and therefore any transaction in between the advertising agency and the media agency like .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRadheshyam Chiranjilal Goenka Vs. Adjudicating Officer,
Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT
Decided on: Apr-18-2001
..... and sub brokers rules 1992 redressal of grievances of the clients by broker within the stipulated time is a condition subject ..... by the appellant to justify its failure to make payment to clients 8 learned representative submitted that the impugned order has been ..... sold and arrange for prompt delivery of securities purchased by clients the appellant is a broker member of the stock exchange .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPga Tour, Inc. Vs. Martin
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: May-29-2001
..... will not expand a public accommodation s obligations under the subparagraph beyond its own clients or customers as petitioner recognizes clause iv is not literally applicable to title ill ..... discrimination against the other party to the contract is not covered but only discrimination against clients or customers of the covered public accommodation that enters into the contractual licensing or .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAdvertising Club Vs. Central Board of Excise and Customs
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-30-2001
Reported in: [2002]121TAXMAN287(Mad)
..... the constitutional validity of the service tax levied on the taxable service provided to a client by an advertising agency in relation to advertisements 2 all the petitioners herein are interested ..... to the advertisements which would include the gross amount charged by the agency from the client for making or preparing the advertisement material irrespective of the fact that the advertising agency .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial