By Law - Judgment Search Results
Law Vs. Siegel
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Mar-04-2014
beneficiary of Law’s deed of trust. Ultimately, the Bankruptcy Court concluded that the loan was a fiction created by Law to preserve his equity in the house. It thus granted Siegel’s motion to “surcharge” Law’s $75,000 homestead exemption, … affirmed. Held: The Bankruptcy Court exceeded the limits of its authority when it ordered that the $75,000 protected by Law’s homestead exemption be made available to pay Siegel’s attorney’s fees. Pp. 5-12. (a) A bankruptcy court may
Laws Vs. Armontrout
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jan-01-1989
LAWS v. ARMONTROUT - 490 U.S. 1040 (1989) U.S. Supreme Court LAWS v. ARMONTROUT , 490 U.S. 1040 (1989)
Law Vs. United States
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jan-05-1925
Law v. United States - 266 U.S. 494 (1925) U.S. Supreme Court Law v. United States, 266 U.S. 494
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Laws Vs. Davis
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jan-01-1930
LAWS v. DAVIS - 281 U.S. 702 (1930) U.S. Supreme Court LAWS v. DAVIS, 281 U.S. 702 (1930) 281
Hall Vs. Law
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jan-01-1880
Hall v. Law - 102 U.S. 461 (1880) U.S. Supreme Court Hall v. Law, 102 U.S. 461 (1880) Hall v. Law
Snow Vs. Law
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jan-01-1857
the towboat failed to ring her bell or stop her engines and float, in the manner pointed out by law; that the Crescent City had slowed her engines on approaching the towboat, and receiving no signal that she
Rogers Vs. Law
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jan-01-1858
Rogers v. Law - 62 U.S. 526 (1858) U.S. Supreme Court Rogers v. Law, 62 U.S. 21 How. 526 526 (1858)
Rogers Vs. Law
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jan-01-1861
Rogers v. Law - 66 U.S. 253 (1861) U.S. Supreme Court Rogers v. Law, 66 U.S. 1 Black 253 253 (1861)
Law Vs. Cross
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jan-01-1861
agent at San Francisco, had been shown which made his repudiation of Cross' acts equivalent to a repudiation by Law, the common principal of both; but if specific authority to that effect had been given, it would be … San Francisco. Cross being in New York in January, 1850, and about to go to Valparaiso, was employed by Law to make purchases of coal for him at Valparaiso. His letters of instruction are all directed to Cross
Adams Vs. Law
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jan-01-1853
the clerk of said circuit court, that no good and sufficient appeal bond has been filed so as by law to operate as a supersedeas." "And whereas it also appears as aforesaid that the said James Adams, trustee,
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · use +/− or drag to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free