Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: appropriation no 2 act 2006 Page 1 of about 39,954 results (0.053 seconds)

Flextronics Technologies (India) Private Limited, Rep. by its Managing ...

Court : Chennai

..... subject to payment of appropriate vat under the tnvat act, 2006 and central sales tax act under the cst act, 1956. 6. ..... imported components, would form part of the sale price of the goods manufactured and sold by the petitioner, for the purpose of tnvat act, 2006, has assumed significance, due to two facts namely (a) that the petitioner is located in a special economic zone, which enjoys exemption under section 26 of the sez act, 2005 and (b) that the goods manufactured and sold by the petitioner were cleared by the buyer by filing a bill of entry, ..... answered and the imposition of penalty at the rate of 150% under section 27(3)(c) of the tnvat act, 2006 is set aside. ..... goods manufactured in the sez, to huawei india, a doubt arose as to whether the component of anti-dumping duty should be included for the purpose of computing the liability of tax under tamil nadu vat act,2006 and cst act. ..... of the case, the learned appellate tribunal was correct in law in holding that tax and penalty are imposable upon the petitioner under the provisions of the tamil nadu value added act, 2006. 50. ..... which purchased the finished products from the petitioner herein would form part of the sale price of the goods manufactured and sold by the petitioner to such buyer under the provisions of tnvat act, 2006. ..... buyer (customer of the petitioner) formed part of the "sale price" of the goods manufactured and sold by the petitioner to the buyer under the provisions of the tamil nadu value added tax act, 2006? .....

Logan Vs. United States

Court : US Supreme Court

..... 2859; science, state, justice, commerce, and related agencies appropriations act, 2006, 119 stat. ..... 433; consolidated appropriations act, 2004, 118 stat. ..... 53; consolidated appropriations act, 2005, 118 stat. ..... the relief provision has been rendered inoperative, however, for congress has repeatedly barred the attorney general from using appropriated funds to investigate or act upon [relief] applications. ..... 3 (1992 through 2002); consolidated appropriations resolution, 2003, 117 stat. ..... love, relief from the collateral consequences of a criminal conviction: a state-by-state resource guide (2006), updated online at http://www.sentencingproject.org/publicationdetails.aspx?publicationid=486 (as visited nov. ..... if the offender s prior criminal record includes at least three convictions for violent felon[ies,] however, the armed career criminal act of 1984 (acca) mandates a minimum term of 15 years. ..... furthermore, states have drastically different policies as to when and under what circumstances such discretionary acts of grace should be extended . ..... in the firearms owners protection act (fopa), 100 stat. ..... 3d 1072 (ca9 2006), cert. ..... footnote 1 the firearms owners protection act, 100 stat. ..... logan s record as a recidivist, which included three relevant state convictions, led the district court to impose a 15-year prison term, the minimum sentence mandated by the armed career criminal act of 1984 (acca), 18 u. s. c. ..... the bar on funding was renewed every year from 1992 through 2006. ..... 3d 804, 805 (2006). .....

P.A. Mangalam Vs. the Chief Executive Officer, Chennai and Another

Court : Chennai

..... has sent letter to the shop owners who are carrying on business and requested them to close their shops within 7 days failing which, suitable action will be taken to close the shops under appropriate provisions of the cantonments act, 2006. ..... respondent has sent letter to the shop owners who are carrying on business and requested them to close their shops within 7 days failing which, suitable action will be taken to close the shops under appropriate provisions of the cantonments act, 2006. ..... the petitioner submitted an application to erect, re-erect and alter a building under section 235 of the cantonments act, 2006 (form a) on 28.12.2011 in respect of the property situated at no.9, gst road, st.thomas mount, chennai 600 016 and the purpose mentioned was shops for ground floor ..... of the aforesaid provisions of the act, the respondent reserves their right to initiate appropriate proceedings after following the procedure. ..... (iii) the cantonments act, 2006 (41/2006), section 234 contemplates sanction for building plan; section 244 contemplates restrictions of use of building without written permission of the board to change or convert one kind of tenement into another kind; section 246 ..... juncture, a reading of the relevant provisions of the cantonments act, 2006, is necessary, as reiterated hereunder: 234. ..... was sent to the shop owners for getting trade licence, the 1st respondent herein rejected the trade licence application under section 277 of the cantonments act, 2006 (in short 'act'). .....

Permanent Mission of India to United Nations Vs. City of New York

Court : US Supreme Court

..... foreign operations, export financing, and related programs appropriations act, 2006, 543(a), 119 stat. ..... 2214 (hereinafter foreign operations); consolidated appropriations act of 2005, 543(a), 118 stat ..... a state-court suit seeking declaratory judgments to establish the liens validity, but petitioners removed the cases to federal court, where they argued that they were immune under the foreign sovereign immunities act of 1976 (fsia), which is the sole basis for obtaining jurisdiction over a foreign state in federal court, argentine republic v. ..... (hereinafter consolidated appropriations). ..... city of new york - 06-134 (2007) syllabus october term, 2006 permanent mission of india to united nations v.city of new york supreme court of the united states permanent mission of india to the united nations et al. ..... the foreign sovereign immunities act of 1976 (fsia) both codified and modified that basic ..... tate letter announced the united states decision to join the majority of other countries by adopting the restrictive theory of sovereign immunity, under which the immunity of the sovereign is recognized with regard to sovereign or public acts (jure imperii) of a state, but not with respect to private acts (jure gestionis) . id. ..... congress intended the fsia to adopt the restrictive theory of sovereign immunity, which recognizes immunity with regard to sovereign or public acts (jure imperii) of a state, but not private acts (jure gestionis) . ..... the foreign sovereign immunities act of 1976 (fsia), 28 u. s. .....

Tvl.Aswini Foundations Vs. Assistant Commissioner (Ct)

Court : Chennai

..... therefore, the impugned order of the respondent, dated 7.9.2011, is to be set aside and the matter is to be remitted back to the respondent for being considered, afresh, in accordance with section 87-a of the tamil nadu value added tax act, 2006, for passing an appropriate order.3. ..... above, the impugned order of the respondent, dated 7.9.2011, is set aside and the matter is remitted back to the respondent for passing a fresh assessment order, in view of section 87-a of the tamil nadu value added tax act, 2006, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. ..... the main contention of the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner is that the impugned order passed by the respondent, dated 7.9.2011, is arbitrary and illegal, as it is contrary to section 87-a of the tamil nadu value added tax act, 2006. ..... since, the period in question is from 1.4.2006 to 31.12.2006, a self assessment order ought to have been passed by the respondent. ..... this writ petition is filed under article 226 of the constitution of india praying for the issuance of a writ of certiorarified mandamus calling for the records of the respondent and quash the assessment proceedings in tngst 1582246/2006-07 dated 07.09.2011 issued therein and direct the respondent to pass fresh self assessment orders as per section 87-a of tnvat act.o r d e r1. .....

M/S. K. Rajendran and Co, Namakkal and Another Vs. the Assistant Commi ...

Court : Chennai

..... therefore, the impugned order of the respondent, dated 30.03.2012, is to be set aside and the matter is to be remitted back to the respondent for being considered, afresh, in accordance with section 87-a of the tamil nadu value added tax act, 2006, and pass an appropriate order. 3. ..... above, the impugned order of the respondent, dated 30.03.2012, is set aside and the matter is remitted back to the respondent for passing a fresh assessment order, in view of section 87-a of the tamil nadu value added tax act, 2006, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 5. ..... 3161690/ 2006-2007 (upto 31.12.2006) and quash the impugned order dt 30.3.2012 as being passed without jurisdiction and authority of law and also against the principles of natural justice and to further direct the respondent to complete the assessment in accordance with section 87-a of the tnvat act 2006 which was given effect to from 18th june 2008 by section 4 of the amendment act no.49/2008) 1. ..... 2.the main contention of the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner is that the impugned order passed by the respondent, dated 30.03.2012, is arbitrary and illegal, as it is contrary to section 87-a of the tamil nadu value added tax act, 2006. ..... since, the period in question is from 01.04.2006 to 31.12.2006, a self assessment order ought to have been passed by the respondent. .....

M/s. Amway India Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. represented by its power agent ...

Court : Chennai

..... appears for the respondents says that, principles of natural justice were complied with and the petitioner was granted personal hearing and, therefore, the only remedy available to the petitioner was to take recourse to an appropriate proceeding under the 2006 act. 8.1. ..... in the rejoinder, the respondent took the stand that the tax liability has been arrived at in accordance with the provisions of section 24 of the tamil nadu value added tax act, 2006 (in short 'the 2006 act'). ..... in these writ petitions, a declaration was sought that sections 3(1), 3(2) and 24 of the 2006 act be declared as unconstitutional and/or ultravires the articles 14, 19(1)(g) and 265 of the constitution of india. ..... to be noted, in the sur-rejoinder dated 29.06.2015, the petitioner, raised several objections which can briefly be categorized under the following heads: i) that section 24 of the 2006 act was not applicable to bonafide transactions. ..... a further relief was sought, which was, that rule 8(3) of the 2007 rules be declared, as ultravires section 80 of the 2006 act. 18. ..... recourse to a statutory remedy, qua the remaining issues, the concerned forum, will take into account this aspect of matter and, if necessary, condone the delay, by relying upon the principles analogous to section 14 of the limitation act, 1963. 17. .....

Tata Steel Limited and ors. Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : [2008(3)JCR365(Jhr)]

..... the proceeds for the entry tax levied and collected under section 11 of the jharkhand value added tax act, 2005 (jharkhand act, 5 of 2006) shall be appropriated into the 'fund'.3. ..... for by the writ petitioners are as under:(i) that in paragraph-1 of the writ petition, the following prayer may be added:(f) for issuance of an appropriate writ for a declaration that jharkhand value added tax, 2005 as amended by jharkhand value added tax (amendment) act, 2008 is violative of article 301 of the constitution of india as the said act is not compensatory in character and also is not saved by article 304 of the constitution as the said legislation is discriminatory in character and also ..... (g) for issuance of an appropriate writ for a further declaration that the jharkhand value added tax (amendment) act, 2008 cannot be given retrospective effect from 1st april, 2006. ..... 48 dated 29.3.2008 creating jharkhand trade development fund, wherein in part 2 it haw been specified that proceeds of entry tax levied and collected under section 11 of the act shall be appropriated into the fund.33. ..... the entry tax deposited under jharkhand value added tax act, 2005 under minor head-106 of the major head-0042 shall be deemed to have been appropriated into the fund.10. .....

Tata Steel Limited and Others Vs. the State of Jharkhand and Others

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : 2012AIR(Jhar)83

..... of the entry tax levied and collected under section 11 of the jharkhand value added tax act, 2005 (jharkhand act 5 of 2006) shall be appropriated into the 'fund'. 3. ..... 2008/930/fd in exercise of the powers conferred by the clause (xxia) of section 2 read with section 11 of the jharkhand value added tax act, 2005 (jharkhand act 5 of 2006) as amended by (act 3 of 2008) which prescribes for levy and collection of tax on import price(s) on entry of goods mentioned in third schedule of the act into the state or into a local area for consumption, use or sale therein subject to conditions as may be prescribed and also other conditions laid down ..... before proceeding to decide the issues referred above, it will be appropriate to make it clear that the act of 2011 has been enacted without sanction of the president of india under proviso to article304(b) of the constitution of india and the case of the state is also that since the act of 2011 imposes entry tax, which is compensatory in nature, sanction of the president of india is not required under ..... additional finance commissioner jharkahand, ranchi section 4 of the act of 2011 is as under:- 4.tax to be appropriated into the fund (1) the entry tax levied and collected under this act, shall be appropriated into the fund, as created under clause (f) of section 2 of this act. ..... deposited under the jharkhand value added tax act, 2005 under minor head-106 of the major head-0042 shall be deemed to have been appropriated into the fund. 10. .....

Dr. Vincent Panikulangara, Lawyer Vs. Union of India and Another

Court : Kerala

..... the contention urged by the petitioner is that as per the child marriage restraint act, 1929, which is replaced by prohibition of child marriage act, 2006 (hereinafter referred to as '2006 act'), child is defined as a person, if a male who has not completed 21 years of age and in case of female, if she has not completed 18 years of age. ..... that apart, 2006 act has also provided appropriate penal provisions for violating the said provisions. ..... we are of the view that the restrictions imposed under the 2006 act or the statutes in this regard which legalises the marriage between the male and female, only if the male is 21 years and female is 18 years of age, cannot be related to an offence of rape. ..... the writ petition is filed to protect and uphold the honour of indian minor women in so far as a provision has been made under section 375 of the indian penal code which indicates that sexual intercourse or sexual acts by a man with his own wife, she not being under 15 years age, is not rape. ..... child marriage is prohibited and after the 2006 act coming into force, identical provisions had been incorporated regarding child marriage and the age of the contracting parties. ..... an exception to the said provision is made which takes out of the penal provision, sexual intercourse or sexual acts of a man with his own wife, she being above 15 years of age. .....