Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: appropriation no 2 act 2006 Court: karnataka Page 1 of about 2,896 results (0.042 seconds)

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

Smt Janaki Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... . there are many instances where the small holding farmers who either by sheer ignorance due to lack of knowledge would be tilling a piece of land adjacent to the land owned by them or granted by the appropriate government and in such circumstances when they are visited with the prosecution or civil case is filed, they are required to travel from the remote corners which would not only be difficult but would also ..... contended by the learned advocates appearing for the petitioners in some of the writ petitions are in possession of the lands as morefully described in the petition from long number of years and have filed applications under the klr act, scheduled tribes and other traditional forest dwellers (recognition of forest rights) act, 2006 seeking regularization and during the pendency of the said applications they cannot be prosecuted for the offence prescribed under the ..... . (xi) hence, we direct that the special court should examine such cases and pass appropriate orders keeping in mind the observations made by this court in w.p.no.51187/2019 disposed of on 26.11.2019 ..... . in order to protect the interest of the state also, it would be apt and appropriate to grant liberty to the respondents to revive proceedings pending before special court in lgc(p) no.1/2016 on disposal of the revision petition before the deputy commissioner and for the present, impugned order dated 28.11.2017 698 passed in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

Sri V G Siddhartha Hegde Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... . there are many instances where the small holding farmers who either by sheer ignorance due to lack of knowledge would be tilling a piece of land adjacent to the land owned by them or granted by the appropriate government and in such circumstances when they are visited with the prosecution or civil case is filed, they are required to travel from the remote corners which would not only be difficult but would also ..... contended by the learned advocates appearing for the petitioners in some of the writ petitions are in possession of the lands as morefully described in the petition from long number of years and have filed applications under the klr act, scheduled tribes and other traditional forest dwellers (recognition of forest rights) act, 2006 seeking regularization and during the pendency of the said applications they cannot be prosecuted for the offence prescribed under the ..... . (xi) hence, we direct that the special court should examine such cases and pass appropriate orders keeping in mind the observations made by this court in w.p.no.51187/2019 disposed of on 26.11.2019 ..... . in order to protect the interest of the state also, it would be apt and appropriate to grant liberty to the respondents to revive proceedings pending before special court in lgc(p) no.1/2016 on disposal of the revision petition before the deputy commissioner and for the present, impugned order dated 28.11.2017 698 passed in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

Mr C V Manjunatha Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... . there are many instances where the small holding farmers who either by sheer ignorance due to lack of knowledge would be tilling a piece of land adjacent to the land owned by them or granted by the appropriate government and in such circumstances when they are visited with the prosecution or civil case is filed, they are required to travel from the remote corners which would not only be difficult but would also ..... contended by the learned advocates appearing for the petitioners in some of the writ petitions are in possession of the lands as morefully described in the petition from long number of years and have filed applications under the klr act, scheduled tribes and other traditional forest dwellers (recognition of forest rights) act, 2006 seeking regularization and during the pendency of the said applications they cannot be prosecuted for the offence prescribed under the ..... . (xi) hence, we direct that the special court should examine such cases and pass appropriate orders keeping in mind the observations made by this court in w.p.no.51187/2019 disposed of on 26.11.2019 ..... . in order to protect the interest of the state also, it would be apt and appropriate to grant liberty to the respondents to revive proceedings pending before special court in lgc(p) no.1/2016 on disposal of the revision petition before the deputy commissioner and for the present, impugned order dated 28.11.2017 698 passed in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

Adarsh Developers Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... . there are many instances where the small holding farmers who either by sheer ignorance due to lack of knowledge would be tilling a piece of land adjacent to the land owned by them or granted by the appropriate government and in such circumstances when they are visited with the prosecution or civil case is filed, they are required to travel from the remote corners which would not only be difficult but would also ..... contended by the learned advocates appearing for the petitioners in some of the writ petitions are in possession of the lands as morefully described in the petition from long number of years and have filed applications under the klr act, scheduled tribes and other traditional forest dwellers (recognition of forest rights) act, 2006 seeking regularization and during the pendency of the said applications they cannot be prosecuted for the offence prescribed under the ..... . (xi) hence, we direct that the special court should examine such cases and pass appropriate orders keeping in mind the observations made by this court in w.p.no.51187/2019 disposed of on 26.11.2019 ..... . in order to protect the interest of the state also, it would be apt and appropriate to grant liberty to the respondents to revive proceedings pending before special court in lgc(p) no.1/2016 on disposal of the revision petition before the deputy commissioner and for the present, impugned order dated 28.11.2017 698 passed in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

Sri Aruachalam Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... . there are many instances where the small holding farmers who either by sheer ignorance due to lack of knowledge would be tilling a piece of land adjacent to the land owned by them or granted by the appropriate government and in such circumstances when they are visited with the prosecution or civil case is filed, they are required to travel from the remote corners which would not only be difficult but would also ..... contended by the learned advocates appearing for the petitioners in some of the writ petitions are in possession of the lands as morefully described in the petition from long number of years and have filed applications under the klr act, scheduled tribes and other traditional forest dwellers (recognition of forest rights) act, 2006 seeking regularization and during the pendency of the said applications they cannot be prosecuted for the offence prescribed under the ..... . (xi) hence, we direct that the special court should examine such cases and pass appropriate orders keeping in mind the observations made by this court in w.p.no.51187/2019 disposed of on 26.11.2019 ..... . in order to protect the interest of the state also, it would be apt and appropriate to grant liberty to the respondents to revive proceedings pending before special court in lgc(p) no.1/2016 on disposal of the revision petition before the deputy commissioner and for the present, impugned order dated 28.11.2017 698 passed in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

N Kamalasambasiva Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... . there are many instances where the small holding farmers who either by sheer ignorance due to lack of knowledge would be tilling a piece of land adjacent to the land owned by them or granted by the appropriate government and in such circumstances when they are visited with the prosecution or civil case is filed, they are required to travel from the remote corners which would not only be difficult but would also ..... contended by the learned advocates appearing for the petitioners in some of the writ petitions are in possession of the lands as morefully described in the petition from long number of years and have filed applications under the klr act, scheduled tribes and other traditional forest dwellers (recognition of forest rights) act, 2006 seeking regularization and during the pendency of the said applications they cannot be prosecuted for the offence prescribed under the ..... . (xi) hence, we direct that the special court should examine such cases and pass appropriate orders keeping in mind the observations made by this court in w.p.no.51187/2019 disposed of on 26.11.2019 ..... . in order to protect the interest of the state also, it would be apt and appropriate to grant liberty to the respondents to revive proceedings pending before special court in lgc(p) no.1/2016 on disposal of the revision petition before the deputy commissioner and for the present, impugned order dated 28.11.2017 698 passed in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

Sri Harish Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... . there are many instances where the small holding farmers who either by sheer ignorance due to lack of knowledge would be tilling a piece of land adjacent to the land owned by them or granted by the appropriate government and in such circumstances when they are visited with the prosecution or civil case is filed, they are required to travel from the remote corners which would not only be difficult but would also ..... contended by the learned advocates appearing for the petitioners in some of the writ petitions are in possession of the lands as morefully described in the petition from long number of years and have filed applications under the klr act, scheduled tribes and other traditional forest dwellers (recognition of forest rights) act, 2006 seeking regularization and during the pendency of the said applications they cannot be prosecuted for the offence prescribed under the ..... . (xi) hence, we direct that the special court should examine such cases and pass appropriate orders keeping in mind the observations made by this court in w.p.no.51187/2019 disposed of on 26.11.2019 ..... . in order to protect the interest of the state also, it would be apt and appropriate to grant liberty to the respondents to revive proceedings pending before special court in lgc(p) no.1/2016 on disposal of the revision petition before the deputy commissioner and for the present, impugned order dated 28.11.2017 698 passed in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

Sri Jayaram Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... . there are many instances where the small holding farmers who either by sheer ignorance due to lack of knowledge would be tilling a piece of land adjacent to the land owned by them or granted by the appropriate government and in such circumstances when they are visited with the prosecution or civil case is filed, they are required to travel from the remote corners which would not only be difficult but would also ..... contended by the learned advocates appearing for the petitioners in some of the writ petitions are in possession of the lands as morefully described in the petition from long number of years and have filed applications under the klr act, scheduled tribes and other traditional forest dwellers (recognition of forest rights) act, 2006 seeking regularization and during the pendency of the said applications they cannot be prosecuted for the offence prescribed under the ..... . (xi) hence, we direct that the special court should examine such cases and pass appropriate orders keeping in mind the observations made by this court in w.p.no.51187/2019 disposed of on 26.11.2019 ..... . in order to protect the interest of the state also, it would be apt and appropriate to grant liberty to the respondents to revive proceedings pending before special court in lgc(p) no.1/2016 on disposal of the revision petition before the deputy commissioner and for the present, impugned order dated 28.11.2017 698 passed in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

Sri Veeresh Rao Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... . there are many instances where the small holding farmers who either by sheer ignorance due to lack of knowledge would be tilling a piece of land adjacent to the land owned by them or granted by the appropriate government and in such circumstances when they are visited with the prosecution or civil case is filed, they are required to travel from the remote corners which would not only be difficult but would also ..... contended by the learned advocates appearing for the petitioners in some of the writ petitions are in possession of the lands as morefully described in the petition from long number of years and have filed applications under the klr act, scheduled tribes and other traditional forest dwellers (recognition of forest rights) act, 2006 seeking regularization and during the pendency of the said applications they cannot be prosecuted for the offence prescribed under the ..... . (xi) hence, we direct that the special court should examine such cases and pass appropriate orders keeping in mind the observations made by this court in w.p.no.51187/2019 disposed of on 26.11.2019 ..... . in order to protect the interest of the state also, it would be apt and appropriate to grant liberty to the respondents to revive proceedings pending before special court in lgc(p) no.1/2016 on disposal of the revision petition before the deputy commissioner and for the present, impugned order dated 28.11.2017 698 passed in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

Mrs K T Kamakshamma Vs. Tahsildhar

Court : Karnataka

..... . there are many instances where the small holding farmers who either by sheer ignorance due to lack of knowledge would be tilling a piece of land adjacent to the land owned by them or granted by the appropriate government and in such circumstances when they are visited with the prosecution or civil case is filed, they are required to travel from the remote corners which would not only be difficult but would also ..... contended by the learned advocates appearing for the petitioners in some of the writ petitions are in possession of the lands as morefully described in the petition from long number of years and have filed applications under the klr act, scheduled tribes and other traditional forest dwellers (recognition of forest rights) act, 2006 seeking regularization and during the pendency of the said applications they cannot be prosecuted for the offence prescribed under the ..... . (xi) hence, we direct that the special court should examine such cases and pass appropriate orders keeping in mind the observations made by this court in w.p.no.51187/2019 disposed of on 26.11.2019 ..... . in order to protect the interest of the state also, it would be apt and appropriate to grant liberty to the respondents to revive proceedings pending before special court in lgc(p) no.1/2016 on disposal of the revision petition before the deputy commissioner and for the present, impugned order dated 28.11.2017 698 passed in .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //