Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: appropriation no 2 act 2006 Court: madhya pradesh Page 1 of about 694 results (0.055 seconds)

Bhartiya Alternative Medical Foundation and Others. Vs. the State of M ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh Jabalpur

..... such institution for the time being in force shall make an application within 30 days from the date of commencement of the madhya pradesh chikitsiya shiksha sanstha (niyantran) sanshodhanadhiniyam, 2006 to the state government in such from and together with such fee as may be prescribed for grant of permission or for continuance of such institution of medical education thereafter: provided that nothing in this sub-section ..... section 7 (1) is quoted below :-7(1): where an institution of medical education established prior to the date of commencement of the madhya pradesh chikitsiya shiksha sanstha (niyantran) sanshodhan adhiniyam, 2006, which has not obtained permission of the state government, whether affiliated to any university or recognised by any board or not, is being administered or run on such date, the person responsible for establishing or administering or running ..... per section 7, in case any institution established prior to coming into the force of amendment act, 2006, which has not obtained permission of the state government to impart such course of instructions, it has to apply within 30 days from the date of commencement of amendment act. ..... the state government, thus it is the prerogative of the state government under adhiniyam, 1973 to give permission to the institutions to impart any other medical qualification in all other system of medicines, therapies or systems which may be considered appropriate. .....

Maa Sharda Wine Traders Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : AIR2009MP207; 2009(3)MPHT304; 2009[15]STR3; [2009]22STT105; (2009)22VST170(MP); 2009(5)AIRKarR498

..... supreme court or the high court declares the law on the question arising for consideration, it would not be appropriate for the court to direct that the circular should be given effect to and not the view expressed in a decision of this court ..... of such process should be emergence of excisable goods, which as per section 2(d) are the goods specified in the first and the second schedule of the central excise tariff act, 1985 as being subjected to duty of excise.therefore, 'manufacture' and 'excisable goods' are two independent concepts and that it is not necessary that a process amounting ..... 2006 circular is as under:the activities undertaken by the cbus is appropriately classifiable under clause (v) of the definition of 'business auxiliary service' which reads as under:(v) production or processing of goods for, on or behalf of the client ; this taxable service, however, excludes from its purview 'any activity' that amounts to 'manufacture' within the meaning of clause (f) of section 2 of the central excise act ..... , 2006, it was mentioned that as alcoholic beverages are not covered under central excise law, the production of beverages would not fall within the meaning of manufacture within the meaning of clause (f) of section 2 of the central excise act. ..... 2006 it was mentioned that as alcohol beverages are not covered under the central excise law the production of beverages would not fall within the meaning of manufacture as conceptualized under clause (f) of section 2 of the central excise act .....

Gahoi Food Private Limited Vs. Union of India

Court : Madhya Pradesh

..... impugned order annexure p/1 is illegal, arbitrary and without jurisdiction and in accordance with the provisions of act of 2006, named as ''food safety and standard act, 2006'' and another act of 2003, named as ''the cigarettes and other tobacco products (prohibition of advertisement and regulation of trade and commerce, production, supply and distribution) act, 2003'', the appropriate authority has no power and jurisdiction to ban sale and use of gutka. ..... food safety and standards authority of india] vide notification dated 1st august, 2011, in exercise of the powers conferred to it by clause (1) of subsection (2) of section 92 read with section 26 of food safety and standards act, 2006 (34 of 2006), made the regulations, named as ''food safety and standards (prohibition and restrictions on sales) regulations, 2011''. ..... the petitioner has filed this petition with the following reliefs:- (a) that, a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction may kindly be issued for quashing the impugned order/communication dated 31-03-2012 (annexure p/ 1) issued by the respondent no.3, with direction to the respondents in ..... hence, the authorities shall take appropriate steps that the food products contains tobacco and nicotine as gutka shall not be permitted to manufacture or sale in the areas and no licence can ..... of the petitioner, the petitioner can challenge the vires of regulations, 2011 because it is a statutory provision framed under the provisions of act of 2006. .....

Vijay Choudhary Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : 2010(1)MPHT435

..... , produce it in reasonable time;(d) when the original is of such a nature as not to be easily movable;(e) when the original is a public document within the meaning of section 74;(f) when the original is a document of which a certified copy is permitted by this act, or by any other law in force in india, to be given in evidence;(g) when the originals consist of numerous accounts or other documents which cannot conveniently be examined in court, and the fact to be proved is the general result of the whole collections ..... -- no instrument chargeable with duty shall be admitted in evidence for any purpose by any person having by law or consent of parties authority to receive evidence, or shall be acted upon, registered or authenticated by any such person or by any public officer, unless such instrument is duly stamped:provided that,--(a) any such instrument not being an instrument chargeable with a duty not exceeding ten ..... evidence either by way of oral evidence of the contents of the unstamped document or the copy of it covered by section 63 of the indian evidence act would not fulfil the requirements of the proviso which enjoins upon the authority to receive nothing in evidence except the instrument itself. ..... it would be appropriate to enumerate the submissions of the learned senior counsel in seriatim as follows:(a) section 35 of the act and section 65 of the evidence act operate in two different fields and, hence, it would be inappropriate to compare ..... jamat mandal : (2006) 4 scc 98.13. .....

Bhartiya Kishan Sangh and Uttam Singh Kushwah Vs. Union of India (Uoi) ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : 2007(4)MPLJ548

..... and not improperly or mistakenly.supreme court has further held that -the location of headquarters by the government by the issue of the final notification under sub-section (5) of section 3 of the act was on a consideration by the cabinet sub-committee of the proposals submitted by the collectors concerned and the objections and suggestions received from the local authorities like gram panchayats and the general public, ..... : 1988(38)elt225(sc) , where the high court interfered on location of 12 revenue mandal headquarter and quashed the notification issued under section 3(5) on the ground that the government acted in breach of the guidelines in that one place or the other was more centrally located or that location at the other place would promote general public convenience, or that the headquarter should be fixed ..... in krishi upaj mandi samiti lahar district bhind and in this petition prayer has been made that the order of shifting the kvk from lahar to bhind by order dated 12.9.2006 (annexure p/1) be quashed and direction be given that the aforesaid kvk be established only at lahar district bhind.4. ..... and take appropriate decision in ..... body and funding body of the project, fully aware about the advantage, need and circumstances, to take an appropriate decision in the matter. ..... to take appropriate decision in the matter considering the dispute between the parties as well as the other facts and circumstances necessary for establishment of a particular centre and also considering the .....

S.L.Seth Vs. Union of India

Court : Madhya Pradesh

..... when a detailed appeal was filed by the petitioners before the competent appellate authority, instead of considering the appeal in appropriate manner, the appellate authority virtually re-produced the entire grounds raised by the appellants in their memo of appeal and passed the order in paragraphs 5 and 6 of the impugned order in the following manner : 5. ..... it is further contended that at any rate neither the provisions of cantonment act, 2006 were applicable not could the provisions of public premises eviction act, 1971 be made applicable in the present claim made by the petitioners. ..... it is further contended that when an appeal in detail was filed against such action of respondents, appellate authority instead of deciding the appeal in appropriate manner dismissed the same on imaginary grounds. ..... this court again completely failed to understand as to how the provisions of public premises eviction act, 1971 would be attracted in such a case where the erection of the building is done in terms of the provisions of 1924 act or 2006 act. ..... from this it is clear that when the appeal was filed before the respondent appellate authority by the petitioners, the same was not rightly considered in appropriate manner as prescribed under the relevant act. ..... it is contended that since appropriate action was not taken, the respondents- authorities were head strong, were dealing in arbitrary manner with the application submitted by the petitioners, the action taken on their part was vitiated. .....

Godfrey Philips India Ltd. Vs. State of M.P. and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : (2008)17VST465(MP)

..... present petitions may be broadly categorised as under:(a) that in view of the declaration of law by a constitution bench of the supreme court in the case of jindal stainless : [2006]283itr1(sc) to the effect that the judgment in the case of bhagatram rajeev kumar : 1994(4)scale1103 , which had upheld the constitutional validity of the act is no longer good law, the act in its entirety deserves to be declared ultra vires as previous sanction of the president was not obtained while introducing the ..... it is contended that if the statement of objects and reasons and the particulars given in annexure r-3 are appropriately understood it would be quite clear that entry tax remains compensatory in its basic nature and, therefore, it is immune from ..... before i take up the issue as to whether the tax is compensatory or not, i think it appropriate to state that once i have held that the entry tax imposed in the state of madhya pradesh as a replacement of and by abolishing octroi, in fact, results in facilitating trade and its movement in view of the past history as ..... before i proceed any further, it would be appropriate to first address an argument raised by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the entry tax levied under the act cannot be tested and adjudged on the basis of the judgments in the cases of atiabari tea ..... at this stage it is appropriate to refer to the facts which form the basis of ..... at this juncture it is appropriate to state that in another decision in state of bihar .....

M.P. Urja Vikas Nigam Ltd. and ors. Vs. Rudra Prasad Mishra

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : (2008)ILLJ50MP

..... , learned senior counsel, for the appellant submits that the appellant is working only from 1989 and after 1999 only by virtue of interim order he is continuously working.in the facts and circumstances of the case, it would be appropriate to modify the order of the learned single judge to the extent that the respondent shall continue in service and shall be regularized as and when vacancy arises. ..... otherwise as there has been change in law the same has to be appropriately understood and properly applied.14. ..... appropriate order in this regard be issued within one month ..... 6088/2006 is called in question by the appellants invoking the jurisdiction under section 2(1) of the madhya pradesh uchcha nayaiaya (khand nyaypeeth ko appeal) adhiniyam, 200s (for brevity 'the act').the facts which are essential to be exposited for disposal of the present appeal are that the respondent had preferred m.p. no. ..... the defensibility and legal acceptability of the order dated december 11, 2006 passed by the learned single judge in w.p. (s) no. ..... our attention was drawn to an order of a i division bench of this court date september 7, 2006 in state of punjab v. ..... after so stating their lordships in paragraph 44 have expressed the opinion as under 2006-ii-llj-722 at p. ..... ...the high court acting under article 226 of the constitution, should not ordinarily issue directions for absorption, regularization, or permanent continuance unless the recruitment itself was made regularly and in terms of the constitutional scheme .....

Achutanand Dwivedi Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

..... keeping in view the aforesaid, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent no.2 to consider the claims made by the petitioner and to pass appropriate order and to disburs.the amount within a period of two months from the date of receipt of certified copy of the order passed today. ..... this being so, the petitioners may approach appropriate forum ventilating their grievance against the order dated 23.8.2006 by explaining as to how and why they could not challenge the said order within time before the authority. ..... it is stated by the learned counsel for the respondent no.1 that the similar writ petitions i.e.wp no.19943/2012 and wp no.1016/2013 are pending consideration before this court, and therefore it would be appropriate to hear this writ petition also along with the aforesaid writ petitions. ..... it is not in dispute that such order of suspension of membership could be challenged in a dispute before the appropriate authorities under the madhya pradesh cooperative societies act. ..... the writ petition was filed by the respondent no.7 herein seeking to challenge action of the respondents of issuing order dated 5.5.2006 under section 86(2) of the madhya pradesh panchayat avam gram swaraj ahiniyam, 1993 (herein after referred to as 'the act').learned single judge after obtaining the counter affidavit considered the total averments made by the parties and reached to the conclusion that the power under section 86(2) of the act was wrongly exercised by the authorities. .....

M.P. Rajya Beej Evam Farm Vikas Nigam and ors. Vs. Ashok Kumar

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : [2008(117)FLR506]; (2008)IIILLJ47MP; 2008(2)MPHT90

..... close down an undertaking of an industrial establishment to which this chapter applies shall, in the prescribed manner, apply, for prior permission at least ninety days before the date on which the intended closure is to become effective, to the appropriate government, stating clearly the reasons for the intended closure of the undertaking and a copy of such application shall also be served simultaneously on the representatives of the workmen in the prescribed manner:provided that nothing in this ..... (2) where an application for permission has been made under sub-section (1), the appropriate government, after making such enquiry as it thinks fit and after giving a reasonable opportunity of being heard to the employer, the workmen and the persons interested in such closure may, having regard to the ..... (3) where an application has been made under sub-section (1) and the appropriate government does not communicate the order granting or refusing to grant permission to the employer within a period of sixty days from the date on which such application is made, the permission applied for shall be deemed ..... thereafter he filed an application for classification before the labour court under the provisions of madhya pradesh industrial relations act hence vide order dated 31-8-1999 his services were terminated. ..... arjunlal rajak 2006(2) jlj 24 and district red cross society ..... . 6285/2006 (s) is ..... 6285/2006 (s) by the employer] have been filed against a common award dated 8-4-2005 passed in case .....