Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: appropriation no 2 act 2006 Court: rajasthan jodhpur Page 1 of about 203 results (0.054 seconds)

Jul 08 2014 (HC)

Banshi Lal Vs. State and ors

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... state, more particularly with reference to barmer district, attributing total apathy and callousness on part of food inspectors for observance of food safety and standards act, 2006 (for short, act of 2006 ) and the rules made thereunder, the petitioner has laid this writ petition with the under-mentioned prayers.a) by an appropriate; writs, orders or directions of this hon'ble court, the respondent no.1 to 4, may kindly be directed, to immediately post a suitable food safety officer alongwith allied ..... d) by an appropriate writ, order or directions, in the nature thereof, the respondent no.1 to 4, may very kindly be directed to constitute a committee, for carrying out suitable enquiry/assessments of the food checking of food centers.in barmer, for last 5 years.so as to know, whether the provisions of the act of 2006 and rules of 2011, are being meticulously adhered to, in true letter and spirits, by the food safety officers.deputed by the government. ..... c) by an appropriate; writs, orders or directions of this hon'ble court, the respondent no.1 to 4, may very kindly be directed to uniformly take action to implement the provisions of the act of 2006 and rules of 2011, in the matter of food checking of all the food institutions, without causing any discrimination, in barmer district, as well in whole of rajashan, so as to ensure that, no health hazards is occasioned, to public. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 13 2015 (HC)

Hari Singh Vs. State and Ors

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... a perusal of the record shows that on 25.6.2014, the superintendent of police jaisalmer addressed a letter to the district magistrate wherein a request was made to take appropriate action under section 3(2) of the act of 2006 on account of the fact that the petitioner was disrupting public order and was indulging in anti- social activities. ..... on account of this behavior, the district magistrate concluded that it would be appropriate to detain the 8 petitioner under section 3(2) of the act of 2006. ..... it is submitted that the petitioner has been detained as per the provisions prescribed in the act of 2006, since it has been found 3 that the petitioner was indulging in theft of electricity supply ..... state government, thereafter, authorised the district magistrate, jaisalmer to exercise the powers conferred under sub-section (1) of section 3 of the act of 2006, vide notification dated 30.7.2014 which is placed on record as annex. r/3. ..... main thrust of the argument advanced by the learned counsel for the petitioner is that while passing the order of detention dated 27.1.2015, there has been non-compliance of section 3(1) of the act of 2006 in so far as there has been no application of mind. ..... the petitioner has been detained in district jail, jaisalmer on the basis of an order dated 27.1.2015 issued by the district magistrate, jaisalmer while exercising powers under 2 section 3(2) of the rajasthan prevention of anti-social activities act, 2006 (act no.1/2008) ( for short 'the act of 2006'). .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 10 2015 (HC)

Poonam Chand Bhadu Vs. State and Ors

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... the detenu tola ram, it cannot be said that the case of detenu tola ram falls in any of the category for the purpose of detention of one year because the section 3 of the act of 2006 provides that district collector can exercise its 3 powers but those powers are required to be delegated to the district collector by the state government after recording satisfaction that it is necessary to do so ..... of detention order was communicated to the detenu tola ram, thereafter, a representation was filed by him and same was considered by the advisory board constituted under section 10 of the act of 2006 and, thereafter, the advisory board granted an opportunity of hearing to the detenu tola ram and vide order dated 11.8.2014 the advisory board gave its opinion that detention order is ..... the superintendent of police, bikaner moved a complaint against detenu tola ram on 24.1.2014 before the district magistarte, bikaner to take action against him under the act of 2006 and after considering the anti social activities in various parts of district bikaner, the state government authorized district magistrate, bikaner to exercise power under section 3(1) of the ..... act of 2006 vide notification dated 16.5.2014 and thereafter, the district magistrate, bikaner perused the criminal record of detenu tola ram and after applying judicious mind and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 09 2015 (HC)

Dinesh Bothra Vs. State and Ors

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... in view the persistent conflict between the state regulations and the central notifications, it is imperative for us to issue directions specially to provide for an interim period, during which appropriate steps should be taken to comply with the judgment of the hon ble supreme court and to issue notifications which are necessary in that regard. ..... preparation and approval of mine plan, as in the case of major minerals may appropriately be provided in the rules governing the mining of minor minerals by the respective ..... we direct that in the meeting it shall also disused and appropriate recommendations be made and placed before the tribunal, as to whether riverbed mining covering an area of less than 5 hectares can be permitted, if so, the conditions and regulatory ..... cluster within a period of three months of formation of association through recognised person and submitted to the district level environmental committee for approval: provided that the director may in appropriate case extend above period up to a further period of six months. ..... the ministry of environment and forests (moef) vide notification dated 14th september, 2006 issued under sub-rule (3) of rule 5 of the environment (protection) rules, 1986 and sub-section (1) and clause (v) of sub-section (2) of section 3 of the environment (protection) act, 1986, in supersession of its earlier notification dated 27th january, 1994, except in respect of things done or omitted to be done before such supersession, directed that on and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 02 2014 (HC)

Derawar Singh Vs. State (Home Affairs) and ors

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... the central government shall also set up a national security commission at the union level to prepare a panel for being placed before the appropriate appointing authority, for selection and placement of chiefs of the central police organisations (cpos), who should also be given a minimum tenure of ..... be service oriented, its role has to be defined so that in appropriate cases, where on account of acts of omission and commission of police, the rule of law becomes a casualty, the guilty police officers are brought to book and appropriate action taken without any delay. s.b. ..... be complied with by the central government, state governments or union territories, as the case may be, on or before 31-12-2006 so that the bodies afore-noted became operational on the onset of the new year. ..... a draft outline for a new police act (9-9-2006). ..... against the 10% reserved vacancies for the year 2006-2007 under rule 28 of the rajasthan police subordinate service rules, 1989 which is enacted to reward the police personnel who perform the outstanding and extraordinary acts of courage in discharge of their duties and with their outstanding caliber in the fields like anti-dacoity or anti-smuggling or any special field of police work including performance in games ..... the next higher post of inspector against the vacancies of the year 2006-2007 as claimed by the petitioner with all consequential benefits. ..... (2006) 8 scc1 in a pil filed ten years back in 1996, which are reiterated by quoting the relevant extract .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 06 2015 (HC)

State of Rajasthan and Others Vs. Saroj

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... umadevi(3)1 cannot be held to have overridden the powers of industrial and labour courts in passing appropriate order under section 30 of the mrtu and pulp act, once unfair labour practice on the part of the employer under item 6 of schedule iv ..... the powers conferred under the proviso to article 309 of the constitution of india providing for regularization of the services of those daily wagers, who had completed ten years of service on 10.4.2006 (the date on which the judgment in secretary, state of karnataka and others v/s umadev ((2006) 4 scc 1) was rendered by the constitution bench of the supreme court), without intervention of any court or tribunal, and were continuously working as such on the date of commencement ..... amendment of rule 6 by the rajasthan class iv service (recruitment and other service conditions) (amendment) rules, 2009 (for short, the rules of 2009 ), a person has to be in continuous service for a period of ten years upto 10.4.2006, without the intervention of any court or tribunal, to seek the benefit of regularization. 9. ..... the workman had completed ten years of service on 10.4.2006, when the rajasthan various service (amendment) rules of 2009 ..... umadevi (2006) 4 scc 1 does not denude the industrial and labour courts of their statutory power under section 30 read with section 32 of the mrtu and pulp act to order permanency of the workers who have been victim of unfair labour practice on the part of the employer under item 6 of schedule iv where the posts on which .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 25 2013 (HC)

Virendra Ragwani Vs. State and ors

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... government is recognized and the mandate of the constitutional requirement for public -35- employment is respected, there cannot be much difficulty in coming to the conclusion that it is ordinarily not proper for courts whether acting under article 226 of the constitution or under article 32 of the constitution, to direct absorption in permanent employment of those who have been engaged without following a due process of selection as envisaged by ..... learned single judge, thus, referred following three questions to the larger bench for appropriate answer :- -8- (a) whether the second proviso to rule 273 of the rajasthan panchayat raj rules 1996 added vide notification dated 29.01.2013 is not an attempt to undo the ..... experience required in services including panchayat raj service and observed as under:- the panchayati raj institutions as per schedule-xi of the constitution of india read with rajasthan panchayati raj act, 1994 and the rules framed -24- thereunder are having a very significant role in nation building by extending and implementing various developmental plans. ..... uma devi, reported in (2006)4 scc 1, because under the said proviso the state government granted weightage of 10 marks for the experience of each year, up to three years, to the employees engaged on ad hoc/ ..... uma devi, reported in (2006)4 scc 1, because under the said proviso the state government granted weightage of 10 marks for the experience of each year, up to three years, to the employees engaged on ad hoc/ ..... 2006 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 25 2013 (HC)

Archana Vs. State and ors

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... government is recognized and the mandate of the constitutional requirement for public -35- employment is respected, there cannot be much difficulty in coming to the conclusion that it is ordinarily not proper for courts whether acting under article 226 of the constitution or under article 32 of the constitution, to direct absorption in permanent employment of those who have been engaged without following a due process of selection as envisaged by ..... learned single judge, thus, referred following three questions to the larger bench for appropriate answer :- -8- (a) whether the second proviso to rule 273 of the rajasthan panchayat raj rules 1996 added vide notification dated 29.01.2013 is not an attempt to undo the ..... experience required in services including panchayat raj service and observed as under:- the panchayati raj institutions as per schedule-xi of the constitution of india read with rajasthan panchayati raj act, 1994 and the rules framed -24- thereunder are having a very significant role in nation building by extending and implementing various developmental plans. ..... uma devi, reported in (2006)4 scc 1, because under the said proviso the state government granted weightage of 10 marks for the experience of each year, up to three years, to the employees engaged on ad hoc/ ..... uma devi, reported in (2006)4 scc 1, because under the said proviso the state government granted weightage of 10 marks for the experience of each year, up to three years, to the employees engaged on ad hoc/ ..... 2006 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 25 2013 (HC)

Ranveer Deharu Vs. State and ors

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... government is recognized and the mandate of the constitutional requirement for public -35- employment is respected, there cannot be much difficulty in coming to the conclusion that it is ordinarily not proper for courts whether acting under article 226 of the constitution or under article 32 of the constitution, to direct absorption in permanent employment of those who have been engaged without following a due process of selection as envisaged by ..... learned single judge, thus, referred following three questions to the larger bench for appropriate answer :- -8- (a) whether the second proviso to rule 273 of the rajasthan panchayat raj rules 1996 added vide notification dated 29.01.2013 is not an attempt to undo the ..... experience required in services including panchayat raj service and observed as under:- the panchayati raj institutions as per schedule-xi of the constitution of india read with rajasthan panchayati raj act, 1994 and the rules framed -24- thereunder are having a very significant role in nation building by extending and implementing various developmental plans. ..... uma devi, reported in (2006)4 scc 1, because under the said proviso the state government granted weightage of 10 marks for the experience of each year, up to three years, to the employees engaged on ad hoc/ ..... uma devi, reported in (2006)4 scc 1, because under the said proviso the state government granted weightage of 10 marks for the experience of each year, up to three years, to the employees engaged on ad hoc/ ..... 2006 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 25 2013 (HC)

State and ors Vs. Archana

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... government is recognized and the mandate of the constitutional requirement for public -35- employment is respected, there cannot be much difficulty in coming to the conclusion that it is ordinarily not proper for courts whether acting under article 226 of the constitution or under article 32 of the constitution, to direct absorption in permanent employment of those who have been engaged without following a due process of selection as envisaged by ..... learned single judge, thus, referred following three questions to the larger bench for appropriate answer :- -8- (a) whether the second proviso to rule 273 of the rajasthan panchayat raj rules 1996 added vide notification dated 29.01.2013 is not an attempt to undo the ..... experience required in services including panchayat raj service and observed as under:- the panchayati raj institutions as per schedule-xi of the constitution of india read with rajasthan panchayati raj act, 1994 and the rules framed -24- thereunder are having a very significant role in nation building by extending and implementing various developmental plans. ..... uma devi, reported in (2006)4 scc 1, because under the said proviso the state government granted weightage of 10 marks for the experience of each year, up to three years, to the employees engaged on ad hoc/ ..... uma devi, reported in (2006)4 scc 1, because under the said proviso the state government granted weightage of 10 marks for the experience of each year, up to three years, to the employees engaged on ad hoc/ ..... 2006 .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //