Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: appropriation no 2 act 2006 Court: kolkata Page 1 of about 1,290 results (0.079 seconds)

Kamala Gupta Vs. State of West Bengal and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : 2006(4)CHN219

..... 3 has been acting in a manner which amounts to violation of the hon'ble court's order dated 26.4.2006 and seek appropriate orders. ..... it is made clear that dismissal of the present petition shall not preclude the petitioner from exercising her rights conferred by the provisions of the code of criminal procedure before the appropriate forum against alleged criminal intimidation or any other act perpetrated by the respondent no. ..... 3 without any valid sanction plan, sufficient powers are conferred on the said corporation by the kolkata municipal corporation act to deal with it appropriately. ..... 3 and his associates have threatened the petitioner and her family members with dire consequences and such an act has been reported to the police, it is the statutory duty of the respondent no. ..... during the pendency of the said writ petition, the petitioner on 17.3.2006 has preferred the present petition. ..... copy of the order dated 26.4.2006 has been placed before this court. ..... however when this petition was taken up for hearing, it has been disclosed before this court that an order has been passed on 26.4.2006 disposing of the said petition. ..... 4963 (w) of 2006 has been disposed of by this hon'ble court on 26.4.2006 with a direction upon the executive engineer, borough no. ..... same is the position with the allegation made in the complaint dated 13.3.2006 in this regard. ..... in any event by the order dated 26.4.2006 the respondent no. ..... 2) in writing on 13.3.2006 indicating the threat given by the respondent no. .....

New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Kutiswar Paramanik and anr.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : 2008(1)CHN44

..... to consider only those applications received by it in accordance with law and in the light of the observations contained above and to pass appropriate orders on all the applications as early as possible but positively within six weeks from date of receipt of a copy of this judgment ..... now that it has been amended by the calcutta hackney-carriage (amendment) act, 2006 (hereafter the act of 2006), there has been a change in the cause of action and there being no identity of ..... he referred to the statements and objects of the act of 2006 to contend that the same was introduced with the object of obliterating the inhuman practice of hand-pulled rickshaws and palanquins as vehicles of public conveyance and to ease, to ..... however, presently with the introduction of the act of 2006, the corporation has not disposed of any of the applications made by the members of the first petitioner for renewal of the certificates of enlistment on the ground that paying ..... which was even to see the light of the day, the respondents were refusing to issue the necessary licences in respect of hand-pulled rickshaws and an order passed by the appropriate authority of the corporation was stayed by this court. ..... learned counsel very fairly brought to the notice of the court the provisions contained in section 61a of the calcutta police act but at the same time submitted that no notification in the official gazette had yet been issued by the commissioner of police prescribing the types of vehicles which shall not be .....

The Peerless General Finance and Investment Vs. Commissioner of Income ...

Court : Kolkata

..... for the department submits that, notice under section 148 of the act of 1961 was issued after obtaining the prior approval of the appropriate authority. ..... above, a notice under section 148 of the act of 1961, the reasons for invocation of such provisions of the act of 1961 and the ultimate decision of the assessing officer on the objection raised thereto found in the decision dated september 22, 2006 are under challenge in the present writ petition. ..... circumstances, the impugned notice dated march 22, 2006 and the impugned order dated september 22, 2006 passed by the authorities are set aside. ..... that, it cannot be said or alleged that, the assessing officer had acted with an inherent lack of jurisdiction in an invocation of section 148 of the act of 1961 or in passing the impugned order dated june 22, 2006. ..... as the question with regard to the notice under section 148 of the act of 1961 not being issued after obtaining permission from the higher authority is concerned, it appears from the record produced in court on behalf of the department, inspection forthwith being given to the learned senior advocate for the petitioner in court that, the authorities did obtain permission from the higher authorities on march 22, 2006 itself. ..... order sheet wp no.1952 of 2006 in the high court at calcutta constitutional writ jurisdiction original side the peerless general finance & investment versus commissioner of income tax-i, kolkata & ors.before: the hon'ble justice debangsu basak date : 6th .....

Ajit Kumar Agarwal Vs. Nischintapur Tea Company Ltd. and Others

Court : Kolkata

..... however, find that during pendency of the said proceeding the lady obtained appropriate order from the succession court in respect of the subject shares. mr ..... desor (supra) by saying that the lady duly obtained appropriate order from the succession court during pendency of the proceeding whereas ajit did not approach the succession court as yet ..... iii) december 20, 2010 application for appropriate interim relief in the suit was dismissed by the learned judge holding it ..... denied mutation for eight hundred shares of maidhan and one thousand nine hundred forty shares of sarbati on the ground of that ajit must get appropriate order from the succession court. ..... sen placed the appropriate provisions under section 397 to section 399 to demonstrate that ajit could not have any ..... application before the company law board under section 111(a) of the said act of 1956 in 2006 that is still pending as we are told. ..... death of the parents and brother, ajit initiated proceeding under section 111(a) in 2006 as stated above that was pending before the company law board. ..... he contended that the proceeding was pending from 1985 to 2006 whereas ajit acquired shares firstly from his father when he died in the year 1968 and then in 1986 when his ..... in a proceeding under section 397 of the companies act 1956 (hereinafter referred to as the said act of 1956) the learned single judge by an order dated june 21, 1985 appearing at page 19 of the compilation appointed special officer for inspection and inventory of the books .....

Ajit Kumar Agarwal. Vs. Nischintapur Tea Company Ltd. and ors.

Court : Kolkata

..... , find that during pendency of the said proceeding the lady obtained appropriate order from the succession court in respect of the subject shares. ..... desor (supra) by saying that the lady duly obtained appropriate order from the succession court during pendency of the proceeding whereas ajit did not approach the succession court ..... iii) december 20, 2010 application for appropriate interim relief in the suit was dismissed by the learned judge holding it ..... denied mutation for eight hundred shares of maidhan and one thousand nine hundred forty shares of sarbati on the ground of that ajit must get appropriate order from the succession court. ..... mr.sen placed the appropriate provisions under section 397 to section 399 to demonstrate that ajit could not have any ..... application before the company law board under section 111(a) of the said act of 1956 in 2006 that is still pending as we are told. ..... death of the parents and brother, ajit initiated proceeding under section 111(a) in 2006 as stated above that was pending before the company law board. ..... he contended that the proceeding was pending from 1985 to 2006 whereas ajit acquired shares firstly from his father when he died in the year 1968 and then in 1986 when his ..... omprakash filed a petition under section 155 of the companies act, 1956 inter alia, claiming transmission of two thousand twenty one shares which he purchased from scattered share holders.omprakash also filed a suit being suit no.1045 of 1968 on april 29, 1968 for declaration that .....

Central Bank of India Vs. R.K. Agencies Limited

Court : Kolkata

..... mr.mookherjee was critical about the letter dated august 7, 2006, the bank appropriated the sum without any reference to court that would be illegal and would be liable to be ..... contend, under the agreement as pleaded by the bank, the plaintiff was supposed to obtain appropriate permission from the reserve bank under the foreign exchange regulation act to repatriate the money abroad. ..... azam khan versus the official receiver reported in all india reporter 1928 sind page-63 to contend, the contract, if any, as pleaded by the plaintiff was barred in terms of section 32 as it was contingent upon appropriate permission under the foreign exchange regulation act. ..... of deblocking, mr.mookherjee would rely upon the letter dated june 23, 2006 and july 26, 2006 appearing at page 62-65 of the compilation wherein we find, the enforcement directorate categorically observed, no charge could be framed under the foreign exchange regulation act and thus the fixed deposit was deblocked. ..... (2) in the high court at calcutta civil appellate jurisdiction original side present : the hon ble acting chief justice ashim kumar banerjee and the hon ble justice arijit banerjee a.p.d.no.357 of 2012 c.s.no.297 of 1987 central bank of india versus r.k.agencies limited for the appellant : mr.hirak mitra, senior ..... in their letter observed, the understanding for arrangement sought to be arrived at, in terms of our letter dated 27 november, 1984 was never acted upon and nothing definite was achieved between the parties . .....

Swapan Kumar Saha Vs. Jayanta Kumar Bose and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : 2008(4)CHN68

..... be noted that rule 1 of order 39 of the code clearly provides for interim injunction restraining the alienation or sale of the suit property and if the doctrine of lis pendens as enacted in section 52 of the tp act was regarded to have provided all the panacea against pendente lite transfers, the legislature would not have provided in rule 1 for interim injunction restraining the transfer of suit property. ..... the defendants' obligation to obtain all permissions as were necessary for the transfer including the no objection certificate under section 269ul of the income-tax act, 1961 and to produce the same for inspection of the plaintiffs advocates at least two weeks prior to the completion of the transaction. ..... was made on april 7, 2006 setting aside the notice issued by the income-tax authorities on' november 22, 1988 and the income-tax authorities were permitted to issue a fresh notice of hearing to the parties and reconsider the matter and pass an appropriate order. ..... a passage from paragraph 4 of the report is placed:it is true that the doctrine of lis pendens as enunciated in section 52 of the tp act takes care of all pendente lite transfers; but it may not always be good enough to take fullest care of the plaintiffs interest vis-a-vis such ..... of order 39, in our view, clearly demonstrates that, notwithstanding the rule of lis pendens in section 52 of the tp act, there can be occasion for the grant of injunction restraining pendente lite transfers in a fit and proper case.14. .....

Lekha Duary Vs. Ranjit Rana and anr.

Court : Kolkata

..... case no.42 of 2006 under sections 8 and 9 of the west bengal land reforms act, 1955 against the petitioner and other opposite party before the appropriate court. ..... decision of this court in hukumdev narain yadav case and subsequently followed in anwari basavaraj patil case even though special or local law does not state in so many words expressly that section 5 of the limitation act is not applicable to the proceedings under those act, from the scheme of the act and having regard to various provisions such express exclusion could be gathered.thus, a conscious and intentional omission by the legislature to apply section 5 of the limitation ..... act to the proceedings under section 8 of the act, looking to the scheme of the act, nature of right of pre-emption and express application of section 5 of the limitation act to the other provisions under the act, itself means and amounts to express exclusion .....

Moloy Kumar Das. Vs. Krishna Chandra Adhikari and anr.

Court : Kolkata

..... instance of a third party in a proceeding under section 34 of the act who has been admittedly dispossessed by the special officer appointed by the court in the proceedings, and is directed against order dated august 16 & 17, 2010 passed by a learned single judge of this court by which his lordship disposed of two applications filed by the appellant, being ga no.1469 of 2006 and ga no.2478 of 2009, by giving leave to the appellant to approach appropriate forum for establishing his legal right in the property ..... and also giving him liberty to file appropriate application seeking leave to sue the special officer, if necessary. ..... when in the application under section 34 of the act, the applicant himself admitted his dispossession by the trespassers, a court having jurisdiction under section 34 of the act should have advised the trustee to file an appropriate suit for eviction of such trespasser, but it was beyond the authority of the court to pass an order of dispossession of those alleged trespassers by way of appointment of a special officer for the purpose of authorising him to take step for .....

Bajranglal Sarda and ors. Vs. State of West Bengal and ors.

Court : Kolkata

..... land as water body and not to make any construction on that land.in my view the dispute as to whether the aforesaid plot of land is water body or not that can only be decided by the appropriate authority in accordance with the provisions of west bengal inland fisheries act, 1984 (hereinafter referred to as to said provision). ..... 7953 of 2006 it has been stated that by virtue of a notification dated august 5, 1994, the department of fisheries, government of west bengal, delegated the power to the commissioner of kolkata municipal corporation to take action under the said provision.having heard the learned counsels appearing on behalf of the respective parties, i am of the view, that the appropriate authority under the said provision can only ..... the said competent authority, in compliance with the order dated 16.11.2006, heard the parties and an order was passed holding that the said property was, in fact, a tank as per records maintained by the corporation and that some portion of it had been filled up in ..... the aforesaid writ petition, however, was disposed of on 16.11.2006 by another learned judge of this court by passing, inter alia, the following order:*** the subject matter of this case relates to a plot of land measuring about 10 ..... had directed by order dated 6.3.2006 to restore the water body within ..... by order dated 29.1.2006, the board disposed of the complaint holding that power had been delegated to the corporation vide notification dated 5.8.1994 and the complainant may approach .....