App - Judgment Search Results

Bharat Coking Coal Limited Vs. State of Jharkhand,

Court: Jharkhand

Reported in: 2007(1)BLJR669; [2007(1)JCR307(Jhr)]

of limitation is applicable only to the filing of the appeal and not to the deposit to be made it therefore

K.K. House Vs. Ito

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Hyderabad

tribunal in the case of smt salma a mehdi it appeal nos 687 and 688 hyd of 1993 had laid down

Powergrid Vs. Central Electricity Regulatory

Court: Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Reported in: (2006)LCAPTEL819

technology to bhel for reducing the capital cost and indigenisation appears bona fide as for nearly 16 years beneficiaries have enjoyed

Dr. Anjali Beke Vs. the Adjudication Officer,

Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

the impugned order dated 8th august 2005 against which this appeal has been filed reads as under having regard to the

Sardarni Uttam Kaur Educational Vs. Ito

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Amritsar

the parties have already been discussed while dealing with the appeals filed by the assessee 14 briefly stated the facts are

Prabhakaran and ors. Vs. State, Rep. by the Inspector of Police

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 2006(4)CTC392

allowed setting aside the conviction and sentence imposed upon the appellants a1 a2 a3 a5 to a1 0 and a11 by

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. V.R. Venkatachalam L/H of Npv Ramaswamy ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: [2008]301ITR236(Mad)

that order was confirmed by the tribunal 3 learned counsel appearing for the department very strenuously contended that the finding recorded

MoniruddIn Ahammed @ Lalu Dealer Vs. State

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: 2006(2)CHN221

by the conviction and sentence the appellant filed two separate appeals one preferred by the appellant lalu dealer and other filed

Ch. Ranjit Singh Vs. Ito

Court: Delhi

Reported in: [2006]7SOT151(NULL)

there being any mention of the status of the assessed appellant is erroneous and opposed to legal provisions of the act

Farooq Ahmad Shah Vs. State of Jammu and Kashmir and anr.

Court: Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in: 2007(1)JKJ185

of the j k public safety act 1978 rather than applying his mind and reflecting his satisfaction in his own words