App - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: app Year: 1971 Page 1 of about 341 results (0.057 seconds)Schlanger Vs. Seamans
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Mar-23-1971
constitution and it was therefore error for the court of appeals to dismiss his case as moot instead of permitting him
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTY.S. Kumar and anr. Vs. Kuldip Singh Jaspal
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Dec-17-1971
Reported in: AIR1972P& H326
chauhan cj l mohapatra a s naidu jj letters patent appeal order of single judge of high court passed while deciding
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRam Chandra Vs. the State of Rajasthan and anr.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Mar-31-1971
Reported in: (1971)IILLJ295Raj; 1971(4)WLN97
that the rajasthan municipal service rules 1961 or 1963 cannot apply to the petitioner as he has not yet been integrated
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDonaldson Vs. United States
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jan-25-1971
and ordered that the records be produced the court of appeals affirmed held 1 petitioner has no proprietary interest in the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRichardson Vs. Belcher
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Nov-22-1971
his disability but because of the offset provision of 224 appellee s monthly federal payments were reduced solely because the supplement
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTConnell Vs. Higginbotham
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-07-1971
3 the validity of this section of the oath would appear settled see knight v board of regents 269 f supp
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTLaxmibai and anr. Vs. Roshan Lal
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Apr-12-1971
Reported in: AIR1972Raj288; 1971(4)WLN103
partnership business that the promissory note was obtained the explanation appears to be plausible 17 besides the oral evidence produced by
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNorfolk and Western R. Co. Vs. Nemitz
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Nov-15-1971
effect on collective bargaining the result reached by the court appears to me to require the icc and the courts always
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRichardson Vs. Perales
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: May-03-1971
an intradural mass likewise the anterior aspect of the canal appears normal footnote 3 impression he may have a very mild
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSilla Ramulu Vs. State
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Jan-04-1971
Reported in: 1971CriLJ1401
orderb k patra j 1 this application in revision is directed against an order of shri g
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial