App - Judgment Search Results

Regina Vs. Secretary of State for the Home Department (Respondent)ex P ...

Court: House of Lords

department 2002 inlr 139 147 para 22 the court s apparent requirement that the protection is sufficient to obviate the risk

Kaycee Electricals, (Partnership Firm) Thro Mr. Jitender Agarwal, Part ...

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 2005(82)DRJ289

3 91 were not available to the petitioners again on appeal the matter was remanded back to the adjudicating authority to

Shri Tpg Nambiar, Electro Vs. Bpl Communications Ltd. and ors.

Court: Company Law Board CLB

Reported in: (2006)129CompCas713

would determine the jurisdiction of a high court has no application to the proceedings before the company law board which are

Vidit Kumar, Ram Krishan Agarwala Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Ta ...

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Agra

Reported in: (2005)95TTJAgra117

is seen that the similar objection was raised by the appellant before my predecessor my predecessor in his abovementioned order after

Kartikey Agarwaal, Renu Agarwal, Vs. Natural Remedies Private

Court: Company Law Board CLB

Reported in: (2006)5CompLJ145

counsel appearing for the respondents submitted the valuer has been appointed with mutual consent of the petitioners as well as respondents

Jagdish Raj Chauhan, Sohagwanti Vs. Income Tax Officer

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Amritsar

Reported in: (2006)100ITD525(Asr.)

cit a vide his order dt 15th march 2000 the appeals filed by the assessee against assessments completed under section 143

The Jcit, Spl. Range-2 Vs. Alfa Laval (i) Ltd.

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Reported in: (2006)286ITR193(Mum.)

00 lakhs cannot be taxed in the hands of the appellant as capital gains during the year under consideration accordingly the

Maharashtra State Government Vs. Ito Ward 29(4)

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Reported in: (2005)4SOT795(Mum.)

was lower than the rate of interest earned by the appellant during the year under consideration the difference in the interest

Maharashtra State Government Vs. Income Tax Officer

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Reported in: (2005)98TTJ(Mum.)993

learned counsel for the assessee on this aspect are not applicable 15 now coming to some of the argument taken by

income-tax Officer Vs. Govindbhai Mamaiya

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Rajkot

Reported in: (2006)100ITD265(Rajkot.)

1 these are the appeals filed by the department and cos by the assessee against