Skip to content


App - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: app Page 1 of about 627 results (0.305 seconds)
Jun 30 2008 (HC)

The Waterbase Limited Rep. by Its General Manager, P.K. Ramachandran V ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 2008(121)ECC9; 2008(157)LC9(Madras)

suturing material could not be said to be a surgical appliance and would not be attracted sic covered by the said

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 12 2008 (FN)

Total Network Sl (a Company Incorporated in Spain) (Original Responden ...

Court : House of Lords

..... of part performance was explained by lord selborne lc in maddison v alderson 1883 8 app cas 467 at 474 to 480 204 the present case can be said to be .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 10 2006 (HC)

Bharat Coking Coal Limited Vs. State of Jharkhand,

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : 2007(1)BLJR669; [2007(1)JCR307(Jhr)]

pursuance of or as a result of an order on appeal revision and reference or review shall be initiated and completed

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 26 1935 (PC)

Janaki Bai Ammal Vs. Sri Tiruchitrambala Vinayakar of the Temple by Ga ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1935)69MLJ291

is one to which section 92 civil procedure code is applicable the district munsif held that it was and dismissed the

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 26 1921 (PC)

Jagabandhu Saha Vs. Hari Mohan Roy, Who Appeared and Chandra Mohan Roy ...

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : 62Ind.Cas.653

decision of the appeal in which it was made it appears however that this view has never been dissented from in

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 26 2005 (FN)

Regina Vs. Secretary of State for the Home Department (Respondent)ex P ...

Court : House of Lords

persecution by non state agents is recognised a broadly similar approach is adopted under both conventions to the requirement for the

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 26 1987 (HC)

Kirloskar Pneumatic Co. Ltd. and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi), the As ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 1988(14)LC499(Bombay)

in each identical case is not necessary when such refund appeals are already pending decision

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 13 2007 (HC)

Shri Annasaheb Balesha Waghe, Vs. Shri Appasaheb Dada Pommai,

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2007KAR2395; 2007(5)KarLJ424

favour of that respondent 2 form of objection and provisions applicable thereto such cross objection shall be in the form of

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 19 2005 (HC)

Kaycee Electricals, (Partnership Firm) Thro Mr. Jitender Agarwal, Part ...

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2005(82)DRJ289

preferred an appeal which came up for hearing before the appellate tribunal on 1st april 2005 on which date the tribunal

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 09 2008 (HC)

N. Mohammed Mohideen and Sahana Vs. the Deputy Commissioner of Labour ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (2009)ILLJ177Mad; (2008)5MLJ6

another and finally found that the first respondent was the appellate authority therefore the delay was neither wilful nor wanton and

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //