Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

App - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jan 29 2026

Apps Business IT Solutions Pvt Ltd., Vs Rathinkumar Mondal

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jan-29-2026

Civil Court, Chennai in O.S.No.7172 of 2022 is ordered as prayed for.2. Registry is directed to number the Appeal Suit, if the papers are otherwise in order and post the main case before the Joint Registrar (Appellate


Mar 25 2024

Appe Gowda K R vs State of Karnataka

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Mar-25-2024

DAY OF MARCH, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO.1513 OF 2023 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN:1. APPE GOWDA K.R. S/O LATE RANGE GOWDA AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS R/O KALLAHALLI VILLAGE KATTAYA HOBLI, HASSAN TALUK HASSANA


Jan 30 2012

Mac.App. 101/2012 Vs. Bhagwati Fabrics and anr

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jan-30-2012

OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: 30th January, 2012 + MAC.APP. 101/2012 MEENA and ORS. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Manish Maini, Advocate versus BHAGWATI FABRICS and ANR. ..... Respondents Through: None CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE


18-section briefs on any result in this list

Dec 01 1999

Doddi App Rao (Dead) Per Lrs. Vs. General Manager, Telecom, Rajahmundr ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Dec-01-1999

Reported in: 2000(1)ALD607; 1999(6)ALT721; I(2000)DMC563

Tribunal, Hyderabad, and quash or set aside the same; (b) further declare that the order passed by the Appellate Authority No.TD/ EG/Appeal/DAR/96/4, dated 10-2-1997 as bad in law and unsustainable; (c) consequently direct the respondents to treat


May 22 2017

Mr. Shammi Narang & Anr vs.pindrop Music App Private Limited

Court: Delhi

Decided on: May-22-2017

NARANG & ANR ..... Plaintiffs Through Mr. Giriraj Subramanium and Mr. Simarpal Singh Sawhney, Advs. versus PINDROP MUSIC APP PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Defendant Through Mr.Vaibhav Gaggar and Mr.Shiv Johar, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET


Apr 29 2026

The Commissioner of Customs vs M/S.App Enterprises

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Apr-29-2026

of 2010 C.M.A.No.1224 of 2010 Commissioner of Customs (Port-Export) Custom House, No.60, Rajaji Salai, Chennai 600 001. .. Appellant/Respondent/versus/1.M/s APP Enterprises, No.WZ-612, A/5, Srinagar, Shakur Bhasti, Delhi 110 034. ..Respondent/Appellant 2.Customs Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal,


Nov 18 2013

M/S. Dwarka Das Agarwal Vs. Commissioner (Appe.)-1 and ors

Court: Rajasthan Jodhpur

Decided on: Nov-18-2013

questioned the Order No.03 (RDN) CE/ST/2013 dated 21.02.2013 (Annex. 7).as passed by the Commissioner (Appeals).Central Excise, Jaipur-I ('the Appellate Authority') on its prayer for stay over recovery proceedings during pendency of an appeal against the Order-in-Original No.01/2012-ST-Addl.


May 12 2014

Chhatargarh Kraya Vikraya S.S. Ltd Vs. Addi Registrar (Appe.) Co-op So ...

Court: Rajasthan Jodhpur

Decided on: May-12-2014

BY THE COURT: 1. The petitioner has filed the present writ petition with the following prayeRs.“(a) by an appropriate writ, order or direction the writ petition filed by the petitioner Society may kindly be allowed with costs.


May 09 2000

U.P. Rajya Vidyut Par. App. Wel. Association. and anr. Vs. State of Ut ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: May-09-2000

Reported in: AIR2000SC2621; (2000)IILLJ755SC; 2000(4)SCALE561; 2000 (5) SCC 438

v. U.P. Parivahan Nigam Shikshak Berozgar Sangh : AIR1995SC2152 , has laid down clear criteria as to regular appointment of apprentices governed by the Apprentices Act, 1961. The relevant principles are as follows:(i) Other things being equal,


May 02 2018

Rajesh Jain vs.state (Thr. ld.app)

Court: Delhi

Decided on: May-02-2018

HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:26. h April, 2018 Decided on:2. d May, 2018 BAIL APPLN. 477/2018 RAJESH JAIN ........ Petitioner Represented by: Mr.Sudhir Nandrajog and Mr.Manoj Ohri, Sr. Advocates with Mr. Akhil Mital,


  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »
Loading chart…

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial