App - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: app Year: 1995 Page 1 of about 5,723 results (0.049 seconds)Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Venu Suresh Sanjay Trust (Cit V. Venu S ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Dec-01-1995
Reported in: (1997)138CTR(Mad)97
indeterminate or unknown sub s 4 of s 21 would apply and the assessees would be liable to be assessed in
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMrs. Shrimathi Mahesh Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax. (Also Mis ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-12-1995
Reported in: (1996)56TTJ(Mad)381
as they do to a single common question these five appeals by the assessees were heard together and are disposed of
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRevathi Vs. Sixth Income-tax Officer
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT
Decided on: Sep-04-1995
Reported in: (1996)57ITD44(Bang.)
the detailed discussions of the facts made by the cit appeals in his appellate order being extracted below the appellant is
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Income Tax Vs. O. K. Arumugham Chettiar and anr.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-05-1995
Reported in: (1997)141CTR(Mad)47
lottery cannot be equated to produce the income learned counsel appearing for the assessee also relied upon certain decisions in order
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAtlas Corporation Vs. Income-tax Officer
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai
Decided on: Jun-30-1995
Reported in: (1996)57ITD139(Mum.)
appeal before the tribunal 5 in order to understand and appreciate the case correctly the factual background of the case has
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJewels of India Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-02-1995
Reported in: 1995IVAD(Delhi)585; 60(1995)DLT747a; 1995(35)DRJ439
could be accommodated in doha and thus there are more applicants and lesser space for which the respondent no 2 had
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTA.M.S. Ahamed Ibrahim and Bros. Vs. State of Tamil Nadu
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-24-1995
Reported in: [1997]223ITR860(Mad)
passed by the ao aggrieved the assessee filed a second appeal before the tribunal the tribunal also agreed with the view
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMinor Prahlad Ugardas Patel Oral Vs. Inspecting Assistant
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Ahmedabad
Decided on: May-29-1995
Reported in: (1995)53TTJ(Ahd.)115
and vesting discretion in them to accumulate the income or apply it for the benefit of any one or more of
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKothari Vora Associates Vs. Assistant Commissioner of
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Pune
Decided on: Jul-31-1995
Reported in: (1996)57ITD171(Pune.)
accordance with the statute which confers it the right to apply for registration is not a vested right but only a
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBanyan and Berry Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Dec-21-1995
Reported in: (1996)131CTR(Guj)127; [1996]222ITR831(Guj)
tantamount to a change of opinion but a more cautious approach of the ito by way of protective assessment to avoid
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial