App - Judgment Search Results

The Waterbase Limited Rep. by Its General Manager, P.K. Ramachandran V ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 2008(121)ECC9; 2008(157)LC9(Madras)

material is affixed thereto it ceases to be a surgical appliance and would fall within the term suturing material in note

Total Network Sl (a Company Incorporated in Spain) (Original Responden ...

Court: House of Lords

..... of part performance was explained by lord selborne lc in maddison v alderson 1883 8 app cas 467 at 474 to 480 204 the present case can be said to be .....

Bharat Coking Coal Limited Vs. State of Jharkhand,

Court: Jharkhand

Reported in: 2007(1)BLJR669; [2007(1)JCR307(Jhr)]

assessing authority from perusal of the order passed by the appellate authority it is evidently clear that the appellate authority remanded

Janaki Bai Ammal Vs. Sri Tiruchitrambala Vinayakar of the Temple by Ga ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1935)69MLJ291

dispute between two trustees and the full bench decision in appanna poricha v narasinga poricha air1922mad17 has been relied on but

Jagabandhu Saha Vs. Hari Mohan Roy, Who Appeared and Chandra Mohan Roy ...

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: 62Ind.Cas.653

entered into as regards those matters on behalf of the appellant it is pointed out that a different view has been

Regina Vs. Secretary of State for the Home Department (Respondent)ex P ...

Court: House of Lords

he gives with which i agree i would dismiss this appeal lord hope of craighead my lords 2 i have had

Kirloskar Pneumatic Co. Ltd. and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi), the As ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 1988(14)LC499(Bombay)

the respondents submitted that the petitioners had not preferred any applications and therefore no relief can be granted in respect of

Shri Annasaheb Balesha Waghe, Vs. Shri Appasaheb Dada Pommai,

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: ILR2007KAR2395; 2007(5)KarLJ424

1976 n kumar j cross objection in respect of decree appealed against held just as an appeal is preferred by a

Kaycee Electricals, (Partnership Firm) Thro Mr. Jitender Agarwal, Part ...

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 2005(82)DRJ289

claim of exemption from payment of duty rejected in adjudication appeal to appellate tribunal which directed pre deposit of rs 40

N. Mohammed Mohideen and Sahana Vs. the Deputy Commissioner of Labour ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (2009)ILLJ177Mad; (2008)5MLJ6

whatever applies to a government servant need not be made applicable to the beedi workers who are governed by the provisions