Patna Court May 2012 Judgments
Todo Paswan Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-25-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.2203 of 2012 ====================================================== Todo Paswan .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH25. 01-2012 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code. The name of the petitioner sprang up on the confession of the co-accused. A statement has been made that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the above named petitioner be released on anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, on furnishing the bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of...
Tag this Judgment!Mahendra Ram@dinesh Ram Vs. the State of Bihar and anr
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-25-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.2568 of 2012 ====================================================== Mahendra Ram@Dinesh Ram .... .... Petitioner. Versus The State Of Bihar & Anr .... .... Opposite Parties. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH25. 01-2012 Heard the learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner being the husband is apprehending his arrest in complaint case in which cognizance has been taken under Section 498A and 323 of the I.P.C. On instructions, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is ready to keep the complainant as wife with full dignity and honour. It appears that wife was ready for reconciliation but the petitioner could not appear before the learned court below since he is doing job outside the State. In that view of the matter, let the petitioner, above named, ...
Tag this Judgment!Shambhu Giri @ Mahanth Shambhu Vs. Binod Giri @ Binod Thakur
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-25-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA First Appeal No.200 of 2002 Shambhu Giri @ Mahanth Shambhu Versus Binod Giri @ Binod Thakur ---------------------------------- 07. 25.01.2012. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant on the interlocutory application No.10490 of 2010 and I.A. No.6283 of 2011. I.A. No.10490 of 2010 is substitution application. Because of delay in filing the substitution application, a separate application praying for condoning the delay has been filed which has been numbered as I.A. No.6283 of 2011. The learned counsel for the appellant submitted that in fact the substitution application was filed after the petitioner was nominated as chela of the sole appellant by the villagers and, therefore, during this process, some delay has occurred. In view of the above submission of the learned counsel, I am satisfied that the appellant was prevented by sufficient cause from not filing the substitution application within time. Therefore, the delay in filing the substit...
Tag this Judgment!Manish Meghaniandors. Vs. State of Biharandanr.
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-25-2012
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.26 of 2011 (2) dt.25-01-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.26 of 2011 ====================================================== Manish Meghani & Ors. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus State Of Bihar&Anr. .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY25. 01-2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that this matter relates to passage through temple. The informant of the present case has broken the boundary wall of the temple and tried to use the same as passage and for that an F.I.R. was lodged by petitioner no.1 which was found to be true by the police whereafter after two days the present...
Tag this Judgment!Vijay Kumar and ors. Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-25-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.2414 of 2012 ====================================================== Vijay Kumar & Ors. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH25. 01-2012 Petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offences under Sections 147, 149, 341, 323, 353, 332, 393, 379, 224, 225 of the I.P.C. It is alleged that house of one Umesh Sah was raided when four hundred sachets of country made liquor of 200ml each were recovered and when Umesh Sah was arrested, the villagers tried to rescue him and petitioners also tried to snatch the arms of the police. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that for the same occurrence, Hathauri P.S. Case No. 55 of 2011 was lodged in which only Umesh Sah was made accused. Though ...
Tag this Judgment!Dhrup Singh Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-25-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.2370 of 2012 ====================================================== Dhrup Singh .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH25. 01-2012 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 302 and 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code. An F.I.R. was lodged under Section 302 of the IPC when husband of the informant did not return and after two days of the occurrence his dead body was found floating in the river then suspicion was raised against the petitioners being the agnates of the informant. It appears that post mortem report reflects no external injury and cause of death was opined by the doctor as exposure due to sun stroke. Similar is the evidence o...
Tag this Judgment!Baiju Yadav @ Baidhnath Prasad @ Baijnath Prasad Vs. the State of Biha ...
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-25-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.1156 of 2012 Baiju Yadav @ Baidhnath Prasad @ Baijnath Prasad Versus The State Of Bihar ---------------------------------- 2/ 25.1.2012 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is languishing in custody since 10.10.2011 in a case registered under sections 447, 307 and 326/34 of the Indian Penal Code and section 27 of the Arms Act. The injury report brought by the petitioner reflects that one foreign body has been found lodged in the apex part of the right lungs. It is alleged that two persons including the petitioner resorted to firing. Considering the opinion of the doctor that only one foreign body has been found during X Ray, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing the bail bond of Rs.10000/(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M. Gaya in Konch P.S. Case no. 114 of 2011 . Anil/ (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)...
Tag this Judgment!Chandan Kumar and anr. Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-25-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.2978 o1. Chandan Kumar.2. Anmol Kumar, both are son of Uma Shankar Das @ Umi Das, resident of village Chakbijagani, P. S. Hajipur Sadar, District Vaishali. ............. Petitioner. Versus The State of Bihar ............ Opp. Party. ---------------------------------- 02/ 25.01.2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. This is a petition for grant of regular bail for the offence under Section 379/34 of the Indian Penal Code with regard to the theft of a chain. However, one Kallu Mahto was caught in connection with the said theft and on his confessional statement the name of the petitioner brought who has been granted bail by this Court vide order dated 11.11.2011 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 35523 of 2011. The petitioner is in custody since 17.11.2011. Hence, having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, the above named petitioners are directed to be released on bail on furn...
Tag this Judgment!Md. Salim @ Md. Salim Ansari Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-25-2012
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.1171 of 2012 (2) dt.25-01-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.1171 of 2012 ====================================================== Md. Salim @ Md. Salim Ansari .... .... Petitioner. Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party. ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner. : Mr. S.A. Azim, Advocate. For the Opposite Party. : Mr. Uma Shankar Pd. Singh, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH25. 01-2012 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner has renewed his prayer for bail in connection with Industrial P.S. Case No. 36/09, G. R. No. 2084 of 2009/Tr. No. 08 of 2010 registered for the offence under Sections 20, 22 and 25 of the N.D. P.S. Act. Recovery is of 33 Kg. 900 Grams of Ganja. It is submitted that now evidence ha...
Tag this Judgment!Ramanuj Singh Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-25-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.2524 of 2012 ====================================================== Ramanuj Singh .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH25. 01-2012 Petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offences under Sections 302/34 of the I.P.C. There is general accusation of assaulting the father of the informant. There is no specific accusation of assault against the petitioner. The postmortem report reflects one incise external injury. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the petitioner namely Ramanuj Singh, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the lik...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- Next ›
- Last »