Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Sudhir Kumar Singh Vs. the State of Bihar and anr

Sudhir Kumar Singh vs The State of Bihar and anr

Type Court Judgment Court Patna Decided May 25, 2012
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/975489

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Patna High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sudhir Kumar Singh

Respondent

The State of Bihar and anr

Excerpt

patna high court cr.misc. no.476 of 2011 (2) dt.25-01-2012 in the high court of judicature at patna criminal miscellaneous no.476 of 2011 ====================================================== sudhir kumar singh .... .... petitioner/s versus the state of bihar & anr .... .... opposite party/s ====================================================== appearance : for the petitioner/s : mr. for the opposite party/s : mr. ====================================================== coram: honourable mr. justice shivaji pandey oral order (per: honourable mr. justice shivaji pandey”25. 01-2012 heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the state. learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that in a partition suit proceeding opposite party no.2 has filed a petition that nirmala devi died leaving behind her husband sachidanand singh and three sons and made a prayer that she may be replaced by her successors heirs whereas an application was filed by the petitioner under order 22 rule 4 of the code of civil procedure that nirmala devi did not file any written statement and as such her name should be deleted and exempted for bringing on record her legal heirs and her representative. the trial court has found the allegation to be true but refused to take appropriate action in the matter. he further submits that the trial court ought patna high court cr.misc. no.476 of 2011 (2) dt.25-01-2012 to have made an enquiry under section 340 of the indian penal code. issue notice to opposite party no.2 under ordinary process as well as registered cover with a/d for which requisites etc. must be filed within a period of one week, failing which this application as against him shall stand rejected without further reference to the bench. (shivaji pandey, j.) vinay/-

Full Judgment

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.476 of 2011 (2) dt.25-01-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.476 of 2011 ====================================================== Sudhir Kumar Singh .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar & Anr .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY”

25. 01-2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that in a partition suit proceeding opposite party no.2 has filed a petition that Nirmala Devi died leaving behind her husband Sachidanand Singh and three sons and made a prayer that she may be replaced by her successors heirs whereas an application was filed by the petitioner under Order 22 Rule 4 of the Code of Civil Procedure that Nirmala Devi did not file any written statement and as such her name should be deleted and exempted for bringing on record her legal heirs and her representative. The trial court has found the allegation to be true but refused to take appropriate action in the matter. He further submits that the trial court ought Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.476 of 2011 (2) dt.25-01-2012 to have made an enquiry under section 340 of the Indian Penal Code. Issue notice to opposite party no.2 under ordinary process as well as registered cover with A/D for which requisites etc. must be filed within a period of one week, failing which this application as against him shall stand rejected without further reference to the Bench. (Shivaji Pandey, J.) Vinay/-

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial