Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Dhrup Singh Vs. the State of Bihar

Dhrup Singh vs The State of Bihar

Type Court Judgment Court Patna Decided May 25, 2012
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/975514

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Patna High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Dhrup Singh

Respondent

The State of Bihar

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at patna criminal miscellaneous no.2370 of 2012 ====================================================== dhrup singh .... .... petitioner/s versus the state of bihar .... .... opposite party/s ====================================================== coram: honourable mr. justice dinesh kumar singh oral order (per: honourable mr. justice dinesh kumar singh”25. 01-2012 heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the state. the petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under sections 302 and 201/34 of the indian penal code. an f.i.r. was lodged under section 302 of the ipc when husband of the informant did not return and after two days of the occurrence his dead body was found floating in the river then suspicion was raised against the petitioners being the agnates of the informant. it appears that post mortem report reflects no external injury and cause of death was opined by the doctor as exposure due to sun stroke. similar is the evidence of doctor who was examined in the trial of co-accused against whom charge sheet was submitted earlier and investigation is pending patna high court cr.misc. no.2370 of 2012 (2) dt.25-01-2012 2/2 against the petitioners. considering the aforesaid facts, other similarly situated accused persons have been granted bail vide cr. misc. no. 42505 of 2011. considering the aforesaid facts, let the above named petitioner be released on anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, on furnishing the bail bond of rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned chief judicial magistrate, saran at chapra in connection with janta bazar p.s. case no. 69 of 2010 subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the cr. p.c. (dinesh kumar singh, j.) amrendra/-

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.2370 of 2012 ====================================================== Dhrup Singh .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH”

25. 01-2012 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 302 and 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code. An F.I.R. was lodged under Section 302 of the IPC when husband of the informant did not return and after two days of the occurrence his dead body was found floating in the river then suspicion was raised against the petitioners being the agnates of the informant. It appears that post mortem report reflects no external injury and cause of death was opined by the doctor as exposure due to sun stroke. Similar is the evidence of doctor who was examined in the trial of co-accused against whom charge sheet was submitted earlier and investigation is pending Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.2370 of 2012 (2) dt.25-01-2012 2/2 against the petitioners. Considering the aforesaid facts, other similarly situated accused persons have been granted bail vide Cr. Misc. No. 42505 of 2011. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the above named petitioner be released on anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, on furnishing the bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saran at Chapra In connection with Janta Bazar P.S. Case No. 69 of 2010 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr. P.C. (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.) Amrendra/-

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial